Знатоки души человеческой: Фeдор Достоевский и Людмила Петрушевская
PDF (Русский)

Słowa kluczowe

Russian literature
psychology
Fyodor Dostoyevsky
Lyudmila Petrushevskaya
addiction

Jak cytować

Lekeš, P. (2024). Знатоки души человеческой: Фeдор Достоевский и Людмила Петрушевская. Studia Rossica Posnaniensia, 49(2), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2024.49.2.3

Liczba wyświetleń: 16


Liczba pobrań: 8

Abstrakt

The article deals with the works of Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Lyudmila Petrushevskaya from the point of view of two disciplines – psychology (addictology), and literary criticism. The paper explores the authors’ description of the symptoms of addiction, which manifests itself both in the consciousness, subconsciousness and behavior of literary heroes, as well as in their relationships, and the studies are reported by specific excerpts from the literary works. Based on the primary analysis of the text, it can be argued that Dostoyevsky already in the 19th century, in his works, described symptoms that were defined by psychology as a science only in the 20th century. Petrushevskaya often enters into an intertextual dialogue with Dostoevsky, describing gloomy heroes and hopeless life. The study analyzes specific symptoms and their application based on Dostoyevsky’s Netochka Nezvanova (1849) and Petrushevskaya’s The Glitch (1999). The purpose of the work is to draw attention to writers as psychologists, and to the skill of their artistic and psychological depiction of the external symptoms of various mental disorders through their literary heroes. This goal is achieved: 1) by identifying specific symptoms of mental disorders (addiction) of the characters; 2) a comparative analysis of scientific psychological material and literary text; 3) by comparing the artistic depiction of specific symptoms of characters in the texts of certain authors.

https://doi.org/10.14746/strp.2024.49.2.3
PDF (Русский)

Finansowanie

Статья разработана с поддержкой проекта III/5/2023 Spisovatelia minulosti ako psychodiagnostici súčasnosti (UGA, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia)

Bibliografia

Breger, Louis. Dostoevsky: The author as psychoanalyst. New York, New York University Press, 1989.

Ceher, Evsej. „Primečaniâ: Netočka Nezvanova”. Fëdor Dostoevskij. Povesti i rasskazy. Red. Elena Žezlova. Moskva, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelʹstvo hudožestvennoj literatury, 1956, s. 575–583.

Červeňák, Andrej. Človek v literatúre (Dostojevskij a súčasná literárna veda). Bratislava, Slovenský spisovateľ, 1986.

Červeňák, Andrej. Človek v texte: Dostojevskij a esteticko-antropologická koncepcia literatúry. Nitra, Univerzita Konštantína Filozofa; Spolok slovenských spisovateľov, 2002.

Červeňák, Andrej. Dostojevského sny (eseje a štúdie o snoch a Dostojevskom). Pezinok, Formát, 1999.

Cholakova, Zhorzheta. „Diachronic asymmetry as a comparativist problem”. Zagadnienia Rodzajów Literackich, 1, 2023, s. 29–36.

Čiž, Vladimir. Dostoevskij kak psihopatolog. Moskva, Universitetskaâ tipografiâ, 1885.

Davletšina, Saniâ. „Masterstvo L.S. Petruševskoj v sozdanii hudožestvennogo psihologizma v rasskaze Dom s fontanom”. Aktualʹnye voprosy sovremennoj filologii i žurnalistiki, 4, 2016, s. 51–54.

Dohnal, Josef. „The topic of suicide seen by Dostoevsky and Andreev as an axiological question”.

Revitalizace hodnot: umění a literatura V. Red. Josef Dohnal. Brno, Masarykova univerzita, 2021, s. 215–225.

Dostoevskij, Fëdor. „Netočka Nezvanova”. Fëdor Dostoevskij. Povesti i rasskazy. Red. Elena Žezlova. Moskva, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelʹstvo hudožestvennoj literatury, 1956, s. 205–365.

Golʹdfain, Iosif. „Ispytaem silu hudožestvennoj literatury”. Literatura, 6, 2001. Web. 26.07.2023. https://lit.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200100603.

Griboedova, Anna. „Čitaâ Dostoevskogo, mir stanovitsâ lučše”. Gorʹkij, 2021. Web. 11.01.2024. https://gorky.media/context/chitaya-dostoevskogo-mir-stanovitsyaluchshe/.

Horn, Gabriel, red. Brain science, addiction and drugs. London, Academy of Medical Sciences, 2008.

Hupková, Ingrid, Kristína Liberčanová. Drogové závislosti a ich prevencia. Trnava, Trnavská univerzita v Trnave, 2012.

Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Pathways of addiction: Opportunities in drug abuse research. Washington, National Academies Press, 1996.

Kopaničák, Ján. Dostojevskij a dnešok. Bratislava, Stimul, 1994.

Krinicyn, Aleksandr. Sûžetologiâ romanov F.M. Dostoevskogo. Moskva, Maks Press, 2017.

Kupko, Valerij. „Petruševská Ľudmila”. Slovník ruskej literatúry 11.–20. storočia. Red. Oľga Kovačičová. Bratislava, VEDA, 2007, s. 342–343.

Kusá, Mária. „Ruská literatúra sovietskej epochy (1925–1985)”. Ruská literatúra 18.–21. storočia. Red. Anton Eliáš. Bratislava, VEDA, 2013, s. 143–168.

Lietava, Ján. Drogy v dejinách ľudstva. Bratislava, Uniapress International, 1997.

Lorková-Močková, Zuzana, Ivan Posokhin. „Súčasná ruská próza”. Ruská literatúra 18.–21. storočia. Red. Anton Eliáš. Bratislava, VEDA, 2013, s. 205–207.

Milešina, Natalʹâ, Lûdmila Potapova, Tatʹâna Kilʹmâškina. „Otečestvennyj opyt borʹby s narkoprestupnostʹû: ot Drevnej Rusi do imperskoj Rossii”. Manuskript, 1, 2019, s. 44–47.

Milushyna, Marina. „Foreign studies of the codepedency phenomenon”. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 2015, s. 51–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7862/rz.2015.hss.19

Muránska, Natália. „Hudožestvennyj antropocentrizm F.M. Dostoevskogo i antropologičeskaâ èstetika”.

F.M. Dostoevskij: sostoânie issledovanij i sovremennoe značenie. Red. Lenka Paučová, Ivo Pospíšil. Brno, Masarykova univerzita, 2019, s. 79–96.

Murtazaeva, Feruza. „Psihologizm kak stilevoe edinstvo v ženskoj proze russkih i uzbekskih pisatelʹnic”. InterScience, 1, 2022, s. 89–99.

Nešpor, Karel. Návykové chování a závislost. Praha, Portál, 2011.

Ondrejkovič, Peter, Eva Poliaková. Protidrogová výchova. Bratislava, VEDA, 1999.

Petruševskaâ, Lûdmila. Glûk. Web. 25.06.2023. https://petrushevskaya.livejournal.com/245077.html.

Pörzgen, Yvonne. Berauschte Zeit: Drogen in der russischen und polnischen Gegenwartsliteratur. Köln, Böhlau, 2008.

Pospíšil, Ivo. Fenomén šílenství v ruské literatuře 19. a 20. století. Brno, Masarykova univerzita, 1995.

Romanova, Evgeniâ. „Psihografičeskij aspekt tvorčestva F.M. Dostoevskogo”. Sistemnaâ psihologiâ i sociologiâ, 1, 2019, s. 31–46.

Rozenblûm, Liâ. „Povesti i rasskazy F.M. Dostoevskogo. Vstupitelʹnaâ statʹâ”. Fëdor Dostoevskij. Povesti i rasskazy. Red. Elena Žezlova. Moskva, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelʹstvo hudožestvennoj literatury, 1956, s. III–XXXII.

Šavrnochová, Michaela, Markéta Rusnáková. „Spoluzávislosť v rodine s členom závislým od alkoholu”. Sociálna patológia a intervencia sociálnej práce. Red. Andrej Mátel, Lucia Janechová,

Ladislav Roman. Bratislava, Vysoká škola zdravotníctva a sociálnej práce sv. Alžbety, 2011, s. 66–77.

Skoropanova, Irina. „Problema zla v romane L. Petruševskoj Nomer Odin, ili v sadah drugih vozmožnostej”. Filologičeskij klass, 1, 2013, s. 24–32.

Skoropanova, Irina. Russkaâ postmodernistskaâ literatura. Moskva, Flinta: Nauka, 2007.

Sotova, Svìtlana. „Narkozavisimostʹ kak obʺekt hudožestvennoobraznogo osmysleniâ v russkoj proze”. Naukovì zapiski HNPU ìm. G.S. Skovorodi. Lìteraturoznavstvo, 2, 2016, s. 136–152.

Vlaicu, Claudia, Felicia Aurica Haidu. „Co-dependency in intimate relationship – a learned behaviour”. International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science, 6, 2020, s. 82–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26520/ijtps.2020.4.6.82-89

Zagidullina, Marina. „Petruševskaâ i Dostoevskij”. Čelâbinskij gumanitarij, 2, 2010, s. 24–28.