Ключевые слова
Gelotophobia
Vladimir Solovyov
authority
Russian humour
Как цитировать
Аннотация
The article is an attempt to answer the question whether there is a cultural specificity of humour not in form and content, but in the context of pragmatics. Discussing humour from the point of view of its orientation to the addressee, we can distinguish three main options described by the Russian philosopher V. S. Solovyov in connection with humour, these are relations to the highest, to the equal, and to the lowest. Considering that such a simplified scheme exhausts all possible vectors of constructing a message according to the method of interpretation of the addressee (as higher, as lower, as equal), such a seemingly simple classification, however, determines not only the narrative position, but also the content and form of the message, as well as sets other restrictions. The scheme of relations (vectors) rooted in culture and reproduced by it determines not only how a humorous message is constructed, but also in many respects the readiness of the addressee for an adequate reaction in the form of laughter, and whether the author of the humorous message expects this reaction. Thus, one of the tasks of the article is an attempt to explain the specifics of the (unsuccessful) humorous interaction between the carriers of subjects and objects of power. Russian culture is the focus of the article, which is based on Russian sources.
Библиографические ссылки
Adorno, Teodor. Issledovanie avtoritarnoj ličnosti. Red. Vladimir Kultygin. Moskva, Serebrânyje niti, 2001.
Alexander, Richard. Aspects of verbal humour in English. Tübingen, G. Narr, 1997.
Altemeyer, Bob. Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, University of Manitoba Press, 1981.
Altemeyer, Bob. „The Other ‘Authoritarian Personality’”. Advances in experimental social psychology. Ed. Mark Zanna. San Diego, Academic Press, 1998.
Bahtin, Mihail. Tvorčestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaâ kulʹtura srednevekovʹâ i Renessansa. Moskva, Hudožestvennaâ literatura, 1965.
Bahtin, Mihail. Problemy tvorčestva Dostoevskogo. Moskva, Alkonost, 1994.
Baiburin, Albert. „Ritual: svoë i čužoe”. Folʹklor i ètnografiâ: Problemy rekonstrukcii faktov tradicionnoj kulʹtury. Red. Boris Putilov. Leningrad, Nauka, 1990.
Belinskij, Vissarion. O russkoj povesti i povestâh Gogolâ. N.V. Gogolʹ v vospominaniâh sovremennikov. Red. Semën Mašinskij. Moskva, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelʹstvo hudožestvennoj literatury, 1952, s. 340–348.
Davies, Christie. „Ethnic jokes, moral values and social boundaries”. The British Journal of Sociology, 33 (3), 1982, s. 384–403.
Davies, Christie. Ethnic humor around the world: A comparative analysis. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1990.
Davies, Christie. Jokes and their relation to the society. Humour research series. Berlin–New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1998.
Èjhenbaum, Boris. Kak sdelana „Šinel’” Gogolâ. O proze. Leningrad, Hudožestvennaâ literatura, 1969, s. 306–326.
Friedman, Hershey, Linda Weiser Friedman. God laughed: Sources of Jewish humor. New York, Routledge, 2014.
Friedman, Hershey H. „Talmudic humor and the establishment of legal principles: Strange questions, impossible scenarios, and legalistic brainteasers”. Thalia: Studies in Literary Humor, 21, 2004, s. 14–28.
Fromm, Erich. Escape from freedom. New York, Farrar & Rinehart Inc, 1941.
Gogolʹ, Nikolaj. Šinel’. Povesti: Revizor. Moskva, Hudožestvennaâ literatura, 1984, s. 244–272.
Gottesman, Itzik Nakhmen. Defining the Yiddish nation: the Jewish folklorists of Poland. Detroit, Wayne State University Press, 2003.
Hisamova, Zarina. „Čto podumaet sosed Vasilij?”, Ekspert, 38 (344), 2002. Web. 20.09.2021. https://expert.ru/expert/2002/38/38ex-efco_35931/.
Hunt, Priscilla. „The fool and the tsar (The vita of Andrew of Constantinople and Russian urban holy foolishness)”. Novgorodskii istoricheskii sbornik. Saint Petersburg, Dmitri Bulanin, 13 (23), 2012, s. 185–273.
Ivanova, Alyona et al. „The fear of being laughed at in healthy people and psychiatric patients. Assessing gelotophobia in Russia”. Bridging Eastern and Western Psychiatry, VIII (1), 2012, s. 10–17.
Ivanova, Alyona et al. „Russian attitudes towards humour and laughter”. European Journal of Humour Research, 5 (2), 2017, s. 80–90.
Ivanova, Elena. Osobennosti otnošeniâ k ûmoru i smehu kak psihologičeskij i socialʹno-kulʹturnyj fenomen (unpublished article).
Ivanova, Elena et al. „Osobennosti otnošeniâ k ûmoru i smehu v Rossii”. Vestnik RGNF, 2 (83), 2016, s. 167–181.
Klejn, Leo. „Rasizm i «Psihologiâ narodov»”. Razvitie ličnosti, 4, 2009, s. 56–90.
Kozintsev, Alexander. „On the anti-referential function of language”. The logical analysis of language. Between lie and fantasy. Ed. Nina Arutiunova. Moscow, Indrik, 2008, s. 55–66.
Laineste, Liisi, Anastasya Fiadotava. „Globalisation and ethnic jokes: A new look on an old tradition in Belarus and Estonia”. European Journal of Humour Research, 5 (4), 2017, s. 85–111.
L’Estrange, Alfred, Guy Kingan. History of English humour. London, Hurst and Blackett Publisher, 1878.
Lihačëv, Dmitrij, Alexander Pančenko, Natalia Ponyrko. Smeh v drevnej Rusi. Leningrad, Nauka, 1984.
Lotman, Ûrij. „«Dogovor» i «vručenie sebâ» kak arhetipičeskie modeli kulʹtury”. Učenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, vyp. 513, 1981, s. 3–16.
Martin, Rod A. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington (MA), Elsevier Academic Press, 2007.
Martin, Rod A. et al. „Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the humor styles questionnaire”. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 2003, s. 48–75.
Martins, Constantino Pereira. „Trump: the negative uprise in political humor”. Estudos em Comunicação, 27 (1), 2018, s. 207–217.
McFarland, Sam, Vladimir Ageyev, Marina Abalakina-Paap. „Authoritarianism in the former Soviet Union”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 1992, s. 1004–1010.
Pipes, Ričard Edgar. Russkij konservatizm i ego kritiki. Moskva, Fond Liberalʹnaâ missiâ, 2008.
Polak, Sara, Daniel Trottier, eds. Violence and trolling on social media: History, affect, and effects of online vitriol. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
Roy, Just-Jean-Etienne. Francuzy v Rossii: Vospominaniâ o kampanii 1812 g. i o dvuh godah plena v Rossii. Sankt-Peturburg, Lit. nauč. kn-vo,, 1912.
Schluchter, Wolfgang. Paradoxes of modernity: Culture and conduct in the theory of Max Weber. Stanford, Stanford University, 1996.
Sidanius, Jim, Stacey Sinclair, Felicia Pratto, Colette Van Laar. „Mother Teresa meets Genghis Khan: The dialectics of hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating career choices”. Social Justice Research, 9 (2), 1996, s. 145–170.
Skobelev, Vladislav. „M.M. Bahtin i Û.N. Tynânov (k teorii parodii)”. Ironiâ i parodiâ. Red. Vladislav Skobolev, Sergei Golubkov, Mikhail Perepyolkin.. Samara, Samarskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2004, s. 18–33.
Solovʹëv, Vladimir. Opravdanie dobra. Nravstvennaâ filosofiâ. Sočineniâ v dvuh tomah. T. 1. Moskva, Myslʹ, 1988, s. 48–580.
Sombart, Werner. Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben. Leipzig, Duncker & Humblot, 1911.
Stefanenko, Ekaterina. Kulʹturnye osobennosti gelotofobii v Rossii. Differencialʹnaâ psihologiâ i differencialʹnaâ psihofiziologiâ segodnâ. Red. Muhamed Kabardov. Moskva, Smysl, 2011, s. 297–300.
Stefanenko, Ekaterina et al. „Adaptaciâ oprosnika gelotofobii, gelotofilii i katagelasticizma PhoPhi-Kat dlâ podrostkov”. Psihologičeskaâ Nauka i Obrazovanie, 4 (21), 2016, s. 61–74.
Stefanenko, Ekaterina et al. „Diagnostika straha vyglâdetʹ smešnym: russkoâzyčnaâ adaptaciâ oprosnika gelotofobii”. Psihologičeskij Žurnal, 2 (32), 2011, s. 94–108.
Titze, Michael. „The Pinocchio Complex: Overcoming the fear of laughter”. Humor and Health Journal, 5, 1996, s. 1–11.
Troickij, Sergej. „Duhovnye osnovaniâ socialʹnogo suŝestvovaniâ v sisteme vzaimootnošenij individov”. Visnik Kiïvskogo nacionalʹnogo lingvističnogo universitetu. Seriâ “Istoriâ, èkonomika, filosofiâ”, 18, 2013, s. 48–54.
Troickij, Sergej. „Ontologičeskaâ podlinnostʹ kak osnovopolagaûŝaâ kategoriâ detskoj literatury”. Naučno-tehničeskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehničeskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye i obŝestvennye nauki, 4 (232), 2015, s. 118–127.
Troitskiy, Sergey, Anna Troitskaya, Mikhail Frejdenberg. „Ein Intellektueller jüdischer Herkunft in der Geschichte der russischen Literatur und Kultur”. Blondzhende Stern. Jüdische Schriftstellerinnen und Schriftsteller aus der Ukraine als Grenzgänger zwischen den Kulturen in Ost und West. Red. Kerstin Schoor, Ievgeniia Voloshchuk, Borys Bigun. Göttingen, Wallstein, 2020, s. 153–170.
Twark, Jill E. „Hurra, Humor ist nicht mehr eingeplant! Eastern German Cabarettists Speak Out”. Legacies and identity: East and West German literary responses to unification. British and Irish studies in German language and literature. Ed. Martin Kane. Oxford, England et al., Peter Lang, 2002, s. 127–147.
Twark, Jill E. „ ‘Ko…Ko…Konolialismus,’ said the giraffe: Humorous and Satirical Responses to German Unification”. Textual responses to German unification: Processing historical and social change in literature and film. Eds. Kristie Foell, Rachel J. Halverson, Carol Anne Costabile-Heming. New York–Berlin, de Gruyter, 2001, s. 151–169.
Tynânov, Ûrij. Dostoevskij i Gogolʹ (k teorii parodii). Poetika. Istoriâ literatury. Kino. Moskva, Nauka, 1977, s. 198–226.
Uspenskij, Boris. Anti-povedenie v kulture Drevnej Rusi. Problemy izučeniâ kulʹturnogo naslediâ. Moskva, Nauka, 1985, s. 326–336.
Uspenskij, Boris, Ûrij Lotman. „Novye aspekty izučeniâ kultury Drevnej Rusi”. Voprosy literatury, 3, 1977, s. 148–166.
Vojtinskij, Vladimir, Abrosim Gornstein. Evrei v Irkutske. Irkutsk, Izdanie hozâjstvennogo pravleniâ Irkutskogo evrejskogo molitvennogo doma i Irkutskogo otdela obŝestvennogo rasprostraneniâ prosveŝeniâ meždu evreâmi Rossii, 1915.
Wisse, Ruth R. No joke: Making Jewish humor. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2013.
Zilberman, David B. Pravoslavnaâ ètika i materiâ kommunizma. Per. Elena Gurko, Sankt-Peterburg, Izdatelʹstvo Ivana Limbaha, 2014.
Zinovʹeva, Mariâ Elizaveta, Sergej Enikolopov. „Avtoritarizm i intolerantnost’ k neopredelënnosti u studentov pedagogičeskih vuzov Rossii”. Psihologo-pedagogičeskie issledovaniâ, 13 (2), 2021, s. 54–71.