Religious vocabulary in Aromanian compared to Romanian

Main Article Content

Tomasz Klimkowski

Abstract

The first layer of Aromanian Christian terminology is common for all the Balkan Romance languages. It contains a number of inherited Latin terms and some early assimilated Greek loanwords, due to the Oriental origin of Christianity. As for the later layer, the compound of terms related to ecclesiastical organisation and liturgy or to more sophisticated doctrinal concepts, the Balkan Romance languages substantially differ. In Romanian, it was formed on the basis of Slavonic (or Greek via Slavonic), which was used in the Romanian Orthodox Church by the 17th century. The liturgical language of the Aromanians was Greek (maybe except for Moscopole) and therefore, Aromanian mainly based its religious terminology on Greek, but also on Turkish and Albanian, which can be seen in the Aromanian Missal from the second half of the 18th century. In the next centuries, Aromanian religious vocabulary was strongly influenced by Romanian. The contemporary versions of religious texts, including the Bible (e.g. Caciuperi’s translations), introduce a series of Romanian terms instead of the old ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Klimkowski, T. (2015). Religious vocabulary in Aromanian compared to Romanian. Balcanica Posnaniensia. Acta Et Studia, 22(1), 165-175. https://doi.org/10.14746/bp.2015.22.12
Section
Articles

References

  1. Apostol Caciuperi, Noulu Testamentu. Cărtică di rugăciuñi şi psalñi [The New Testament. Book of Prayers and Psalms] (Bucureşti: Universalia, 2011).
  2. Dumitru Carabaş, “Elements of Religious Vocabulary in the Language of the Aromanians of Romania,” Studii şi cercetări de onomastică şi lexicologie (SCOL) VI, 1-2 (2013), http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/litere/activ_st/SCOL/revista_scol_2013/CARBAS.pdf.
  3. Matilda Caragiu-Marioţeanu, ed., Liturghier aromînesc. Un manuscris anonim inedit [Aromanian Missal. An Anonymous Unpublished Manuscript] (Bucureşti: Editura Academiei, 1962).
  4. Matilda Caragiu-Marioţeanu, “Literatura aromînească veche [Old Aromanian Literature],” in CaragiuMarioţeanu, Liturghier, 111-118.
  5. Matilda Caragiu-Marioţeanu, “Locul liturghierului în literatura aromînească [The Place of the Missal in Old Aromanian Literature],” in Caragiu-Marioţeanu, Liturghier, 118-22.
  6. Matilda Caragiu Marioţeanu, “Biblia la aromâni [Bible at the Aromanians],” Revista de istorie şi teorie literară XXXVIII (1990): 3-4.
  7. Alexandru Ciorănescu, Dicţionarul etimologic al limbii române [The Etymological Dictionary of the Romanian Language] (Bucureşti: Editura Saeculum I.O., 2002), 250-51, 718.
  8. Tiberius Cunia, Dictsiunar a limbãljei armãneascã [Dictionary of the Aromanian Language] (Constanţa: Editura Cartea Aromână, 2010), 894-95.
  9. Dina Cuvata, trans., Bibliea (Sãmta Scripturã) [Bible (The Holy Scriptures)] (Scopia: Biblioteca Natsionalã Armãneascã “Constantin Belemace”, 2004).
  10. Albert Dauzat, Jean Dubois, and Henri Mitterand, Nouveau dictionnaire étymologique et historique (Paris: Larousse, 1964), 256.
  11. Tomasz Klimkowski, „Chrystianizacja ludności romańskiej na Bałkanach w świetle faktów historycznych i językowych [The Christianization of the Romance Population in the Balkans in the Light of Historical and Linguistic Facts],” Balcanica Posnaniensia. Acta et studia XVIII, II (2011): 45.
  12. Tache Papahagi, Dicţionarul dialectului aromân [The Dictionary of the Aromanian Dialect] (Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Române, 2013), 265.
  13. Alexandru Rosetti, “Românescul Crăciun [Romanian Crăciun],” in Istoria limbii române [The History of the Romanian Language] (Bucureşti: Editura Ştiinţifică şi Enciclopedică, 1978), 618-24.
  14. Н. Раевский and М. Габинский, ed., Скурт дикционар етимолоӂик ал лимбий молдовенешть [Short Etymological Dictionary of the Moldavian Language] (Кишинэу: Едитура Причипалэ а Енчиклопедией С. M., 1978), 214.