Main Article Content
Rudyard Kipling says in the Ballad of East and West: “East is East, and West is West; and never the twain shall meet.” Yet, he never expected that with the technological development in transportation and communication, the Westerners and Easterners that have quite different cultures respectively would meet so frequently nowadays in international settings. However, in a sense, Kipling is absolutely correct in that people with different cultural patterns (including beliefs, values, attitudes, norms, customs, and material aspects), especially those from East and West, do encounter communication difficulties, breakdowns, misunderstandings and even conflicts and confrontations just because they fail to understand each other in their intercultural communication. The study of intercultural communication is not something new. However, the perspective from which the author probes into the problematic interaction between Easterners and Westerners is something different. In the paper, the author compares some major cultural patterns: high-context communication vs. low-context communication, individualism vs. collectivism, equality vs. hierarchy, and assertiveness vs. interpersonal harmony. Each of these cultural patterns is defined by examples, two opposite patterns are contrasted, and then potential problems are presented, thus making quite obvious the differences between East and West and their possible consequences in the intercultural communication. Understanding these cultural patterns or orientations which underlie most common behavior of the Easterners and Westerners helps us to see beneath the surface to find out why people from East and West act as they do. This discovery may lead us to appreciate the rich diversity and genius that exist in different parts of the globe, avoid potential intercultural problems and become successful communicators in the interaction between East and West.
- Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C., 1952. “Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions,” Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Papers, 47, p. 181.
- Bates, D. G., & Plog, F., 1976. Cultural Anthropology, 3rd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 6.
- Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & Stefani, L. A., 2000. Communication Between Cultures, Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press/Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning Asia, p. 58.
- Rokeach, M., 1973. TheNature of Human Values, New York: Free Press, p. 161.
- Hall, E. T., 1976. Beyond Culture, Garden City, NY: Doubleday, p. 74.
- Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R., 1990. Understanding Cultural Differences: German, French and Americans, Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, p. 6.
- Hall, 1976, p. 79.
- Hall & Hall, 1990.
- Foster, 1992, p. 280.
- Hall & Hall, 1990, p. 7.
- Hall & Hall, 1990, p. 9.
- Ting-Toomey, S., 1997. “Managing Intercultural Conflicts Effectively,” in Intercultural Communication: A Reader, 8th Ed., Samovar, L.A., & Porter, R. E. (Eds.), Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, p. 394.
- Harris & Moran, 1996, p. 25.
- Stewart, E. C., & Bennett, M. J., 1991. American Cultural Patterns: A Cross-Cultural Perspective, Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, p. 133.
- Goleman, D., 22 December 1990. “The Group and Self: New Focus on a Cultural Rift,” New York Times, p. 40.
- Triandis, H. C., 1990. “Cross-Cultural Studies of Individualism and Collectivism,” in Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Berman, J. J. (Eds.), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, p. 52.
- Samovar, Porter & Stefani, 2000, p. 68.
- Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W., 2000. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach, Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press/Blackwell Publishers Ltd., p. 133.
- Foster, D. A., 1992. Bargaining Across Borders, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 267.
- Scollon & Scollon, 2000, p. 114.
- Kummer, M., 1992. “Politeness in Thai” in Trends in Linguistics - Studies and Monographs 59, Watts, R. J., et al. (Eds.), Mouton de Gruyter/Berlin/New York, p. 330.
- Chu, G. C., & Ju, Y., 1993. The Great Wall in Ruins: Communication and Culture Change in China, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, p. 79.
- Scollon & Scollon, 2000. 37, p. 131.
- U.S. News & World Report, 22 April, 1996, pp. 66 - 67.
- Moghaddam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., & Wright, S. C., 1993. Social Psychology in Cross-Cultural Perspective, New York: W. H. Freeman, p. 125.
- Wenzhong, H., & Grove, C. L., 1990. Encountering the Chinese: A Guide to Americans, Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press, p. 23
- Cooper, R., & Cooper, N., 1994. Culture Shock: Thailand, Portland, OR: Graphic Arts Center Publishing Company, p. 86.
- Moeran, B., 1968, “Individual, Group and Seishin: Japan’s Internal cultural Debate,” in Japanese Culture and Behavior, rev. ed., Lebra, T. S., & Lebra, W. P. (Eds.), Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, p. 75.
- Hendry, J., 1987. Understanding Japanese Society, New York: Routledge, p. 194.
- Harris, P. R. & Moran, R. T., 1979. Managing Cultural Differences, Houston, TX: Gulf, p. 296.
- Chen, G., & Xiao, X., 1993. The Impact of Harmony on Chinese Negotiations (paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL), p. 4.
- Chen, G., November 1993. A Chinese Perspective of Communication Competence (paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Speech Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL), p. 6.
- Wenzhong & Grove, 1990, p. 65.