Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

Norwegian model
bibliometrics
humanities
social sciences
research evaluation

How to Cite

Sivertsen, G. (2017). Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model. Nauka I Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 49(1(49), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.14746/nisw.2017.1.2

Abstract

The ‘Norwegian Model’ attempts to comprehensively cover all the peer reviewed scholarly literatures in all areas of research – including the preferred formats and languages of scholarly publishing in the humanities – in one single weighted indicator which makes the research efforts comparable across departments and faculties within and between research institutions. This article describes the main components of the model and how it has been implemented, as well as the effects and experiences in three of the countries that are making use of the model, and where it has been evaluated: Belgium (Flanders), Denmark and Norway. The article concludes with a discussion of the model from the perspective of the humanities.

https://doi.org/10.14746/nisw.2017.1.2
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Aagaard, K., Bloch, C.W., Schneider, J.W. (2015). Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator. Research Evaluation. 24(2):106-117. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv003.

Ahlgren, P., Colliander, C., Persson, O. (2012). Field normalized rates, field normalized journal impact and Norwegian weights for allocation of university research funds. Scientometrics. 92(3):767-780. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0632-x.

Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: A survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science. 21(1): 48- 63. doi:10.1177/0963662510384461.

Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse (2014). Evaluering af den norske publiceringsindikator. Aarhus: Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse.

Engels, T.C., Ossenblok, T.L., Spruyt, E.H. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000-2009. Scientometrics. 93(2):373-390. doi: 10.1007/s11192-012- 0680-2.

Hammarfelt, B., Rijcke, S. de (2015). Accountability in context: Effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Research Evaluation. 24(1): 63-77. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu029.

Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. W: H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel, U. Schmoch (red.). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S & T systems (476-496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kyvik, S., Sivertsen, G. (2013). Økende Forskningsformidling. Forskningspolitikk. 4(213):16-17.

Leeuwen, T. van (2006). The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible. Scientometrics. 66(1): 133-154. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0010-7.

Ossenblok, T.L., Engels, T.C., Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science — a comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-9). Research Evaluation. 21(4): 280-290. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs019.

Schneider, J.W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performancebased funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science. 8(3): 364-378. doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.19.

Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter. 6(1): 22-28.

Sivertsen, G. (2014). Scholarly publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities and their coverage in Scopus and Web of Science. W: E. Noyons (red.). Proceedings of the Science and Technology Indicators Conference 2014 Leiden (598 604). Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies.

Sivertsen G. (2016). Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model. W: M. Ochsner, S.E. Hug, H.-D. Daniel. Research Assessment in the Humanities. Towards Criteria and Procedures (79-90). Berlin: Springer.

Sivertsen, G., Larsen, B. (2012). Comprehensive bibliographic coverage of the social sciences and humanities in a citation index: An empirical analysis of the potential. Scientometrics. 91(2): 567-575. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0615-3.

Sivertsen, G., Schneider, J. W. (2012). Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. Oslo: NIFU.

Technopolis Group (2013). Evaluation of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the social sciences and humanities (VABB-SHW). Technopolis Group: Executive summary. Amsterdam.