Beyond the Battlefields of Memory: Historical Traumas and Hungarian Literature

Main Article Content

Tamás Kisantal

Abstract

One can describe the contemporary Hungarian collective memory as an interpretational field of some traumatic historical events of the twentieth century. The essay aims to sketch some important tendencies of the literary representation of these events after the millennium. At first, it outlines the wider social and political contexts of these literary works. Secondly, it models the current Hungarian cultural field as an opposition between two strategies of memory labeling them in Michael Rothberg’s terminology as competitive and multidirectional ones. These approaches to the past are also associated with different ideological implications and literary canons. Finally, with a brief overview of some recent novels, the essay demonstrates some pathways of representing multidirectional attitudes to the past in the Hungarian literary fiction of the 2000s.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kisantal, T. (2020). Beyond the Battlefields of Memory: Historical Traumas and Hungarian Literature. Porównania, 27(2), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.14746/por.2020.2.3
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Tamás Kisantal, University of Pécs, Institute of Hungarian Language and Literature

Tamás Kisantal is an associate professor at the University of Pécs, Institute of Hungarian Language and Literature, Hungary. His main fields include narrative problems of historiography, contemporary theories of history, and literary representation of the Holocaust. He is an author of three books, more than 150 essays and reviews, and editor of seven volumes. His next monograph on representational strategies of the Holocaust in the postwar Hungarian literary discourse will be published soon. E-mail: kisantal.tamas@pte.hu

References

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey C. Trauma. A Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012.
  2. Apor, Péter. “An Epistemology of the Spectacle? Arcane Knowledge, Memory
  3. and Evidence in the Budapest House of Terror.” Rethinking History 18 (2014): 328–344.
  4. Boym, Svetlana. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books, 2001.
  5. Feischmidt, Margit. “Populáris emlékezetpolitikák és az újnacionalizmus: a Trianon- kultusz Magyarországon.” (Popular Memory Policies and the New Nationalism: the Cult of Trianon in Hungary.) Ed. Margit Feischmidt.. Nemzet a mindennapokban: az újnacionalizmus populáris kultúrája. Budapest: L’Harmattan, 2014. 51–81.
  6. Horváth, Sándor. “Goodbye Historikerstreit, Hello Budapest City of Angels; The Debate about the Monument to the German Occupation.” Cultures of History Forum, https://doi.org/10.25626/0037. Accessed 4 December 2015.
  7. Hutcheon, Linda. A Poetics of Postmodernism. History, Theory, Fiction. London and New York, Routledge, 1988.
  8. Kovács, Éva. “Trianon, avagy a ‘traumatikus fordulat’ a magyar történetírásban.” (Trianon, or the ‘Traumatic Turn’ in Hungarian Historiography). Korall 59 (2015): 82–107.
  9. Kulcsár Szabó, Ernő. A Magyar irodalom története 1945–1991. (The History of Hungarian Literature 1945–1991.) Budapest: Akadémiai, 1993.
  10. Rothberg, Michael. Multidirectional Memory. Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonialization. Stanford, California: Stanford UP, 2009.
  11. Royer, Clara. Imre Kertész: “L’histoire de mes morts.” Arles: Actes Sud, 2017.
  12. Takáts, József. “Az inga visszaleng – Elbeszélő próza a kétezres években.” (The Pendulum Swings Back: Narratives After Millenium). Helikon 59 (2018): 336–347.