The Development of the Russian Legal System after the “Accession” of the Republic of Crimea to the Russian Federation

Main Article Content

Natalia Cwicinskaja

Abstrakt

On March 18 2014, the Republic of Crimea became a federal subject of the Russian Federation and the Ukrainian legal system was changed to the Russian system. The transition period was set to end on January 1 2015. This transition period was characterized by the fact that the law was created on a day-to-day basis, and as the residents of Crimea were unfamiliar with Russian law they found themselves in a legal vacuum. Laws were adopted in an urgent manner to ensure that the unification was as smooth as possible. In practice it became apparent that the allocated time was not sufficient, and the transition period was extended in some areas. The Article presents a review of the accession procedure and the legal regulations established in the Republic of Crimea during the transition period, and identifies some issues which have arisen.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Dział
Articles

Referencje

  1. Alontseva E., Sledstvennye deistviya po ugolovo-protsessual’nomu zakonodatel’stvu RF i Ukrainy (sravnitelno-pravovoe issledovanie), “Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya” 2010, no. 2.
  2. Bludshaya M., Okkuporovannoe pravosudie v Krymu i “litsa, zamschayuschie dolzhnosti sudei,” 28 March 2014, http://racurs.ua/496-okkupirovannoe-pravosudie-v-krymu-ilica- zameschauschie-doljnosti-sudey [access: 16.02.2017].
  3. German Unification and Its Discontents. Documents from the Peaceful Revolution, ed. R.T. Gray, S. Wilke, Washington 1996.
  4. Grzebyk P., Aneksja Krymu przez Rosję w świetle prawa międzynarodowego, “Sprawy Międzynarodowe” 2014, no. 1.
  5. Kovtun N., Sudebnye stadii i proizvodstva UPK Ukrainy: sistema i vektory realizovannykh normativnykh reform, “Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo” 2013, no. 2.
  6. Kranz J., Kilka uwag na tle aneksji Krymu przez Rosję, “Państwo i Prawo” 2014, no. 8.
  7. Kremyanskaya E., A short note of the development of the Criminal Justice System after the Accession of Crimea and Sevastopol to the Russian Federation, “New Journal of European Criminal Law” 2014, vol. 5, no. 2.
  8. Kryazhkov V., Krymskii pretsedent: konstitutsionno-pravovoe osmyslenie, “Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie” 2014, no. 5.
  9. Kululaev K., Zakonodatelstvo Rossii ne rabotaet v Krymu, 19 August 2015, http://7x7-journal.ru/post/66107 [access: 16.02.2017].
  10. Makeeva I., Ponyatie dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovno-protsessual’nomu zakonodatel’stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Ukrainy, “Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya
  11. yustitsiya” 2013, no. 5.
  12. Markin V., V Krymu zaderzhan odni iz liderov obschestvennoi organizatsii “Medzhlis krymsko-tatarskogo naroda” po podozreniyu v organizatsii i uchastii v massovykh bespriadkach, 29 January 2015, http://sledcom.ru/news/item/889047/ [access: 16.02.2017].
  13. Marysheva N., Regulirovanie mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa v stranakh SNG, in Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo, ed. N. Marysheva, Moskva 2011.
  14. Mrak M., Succession of States, The Hague 1999.
  15. Nikoforov V., Krymskii biznes ne uspevaet pereiti v Rossiyu. Gossovet Kryma predlozhil prodlit’ pereregistratsiyu yuridicheskikh lits, 23 November 2014, http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2595496 [access: 16.02.2017].
  16. O’Conell D.P., State Succession in Municpal and International Law, London 1967.
  17. Romashov P., Poryadok prinyatiya v sostav Rossiiskoi Federatsii novogo sub’ekta RF, “Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatelstve” 2014, no. 2.
  18. Szafarz R., Sukcesja państw w odniesieniu do traktatów we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym, Wrocław 1982.
  19. V Krymu po zakonodatelstvu Rossii zaregistrirovalos’ 22% SKHD, 12 November 2014, http://investigator.org.ua/news/141573/ [access: 16.02.2017].
  20. Vienna Convention on the Succession of States in Respect of Treaties, 1978.
  21. Wojciechowski M., Pewność prawa, Gdańsk 2014.
  22. Deklaratsiya nezavisimosti Avtonomnoi Respubliki Krym i goroda Sevastopolya, “Sbornik normativno-pravovykh aktov Respubliki Krym” 2014, no. 3, part 1.
  23. Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Krym ot 11.04.2014, no. 2010-6/14 ‘Polozhenie ob osobennostyakh primeneniya zakonodatelstva o nalogakh i sborakh na territorii Respubliki Krym v perekhodnyi period,’ “Sbornik normativno-pravovykh aktov Respubliki Krym” 2014, no. 4, part 2.
  24. Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Krym ot 30.04.2014, no. 2093-6/14 ‘O vnesenie izmenenii’ v Postanovlenie Gosudarstvennogo Soveta Respubliki Krym ot 11.04.2014, no. 2010-6/14 ‘Ob utverzhdenii Polozheniya ob osobennostyakh primeneniya zakonodatelstva o nalogakh i sborakh na territorii Respubliki Krym w perekhodnyi period,’ ibidem, no. 4, part 3.
  25. Postanovlenie Verkhovnoi Rady ARK ‘O provedenii obshchekrymskogo referenduma,’ “Sbornik normativno-pravovykh aktov Respubliki Krym” 2014, no. 3, part 1.
  26. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ‘O dne nachala deyatel’nosti federal’nykh sudov na territoriyakh Respubliki Krym i goroda federal’nogo znacheniya Sevastopolya,’ http://supcourt.ru/search.php?searchf=%EA%F0%FB%EC [access: 16.02.2017].
  27. Postanovlenie Verkhovnoi Rady Respubliki Krym ‘O nezavisimosti Kryma,’ “Sbornik normativno-pravovykh aktov Respubliki Krym” 2014, no. 3, part 1.
  28. Stenograma trista sorok sed’mogo (vneocherednogo) zasedaniya Soveta Federatsii 1 marta 2014 goda, Federalnoe Sobranie Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Iskh. St-347 ot 0103.2014, Moskva.
  29. Ukaz Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii ot 17 marta 2014 g. N 147 ‘O priznanii Respubliki Krym,’ http://base.garant.ru/70613384/ [access: 16.02.2017].
  30. Zakon Ukrainy N 3674-VI ot 8.07.2011 ‘O Sudebnom Sbore,’ http://kodeksy.com.ua/ka/o_sudebnom_sbore.htm [access: 16.02.2017].