Abstract
This paper examines four discursive strategies: colonizing, animalizing, infantalizing and (plant) vegetative that characters in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy use to name the Crakers, post-humans with modified DNA structure. In discussing them, I expose a dehumanizing effect this seemingly neutral processes of naming and describing have. The interpretative findings discussed in this paper constitute a response to largely anthropocentrically oriented extensive criticism on Atwood’s writing. By questioning the neutrality of the narrative through a postcolonial reading of the trilogy, I argue that MaddAddam challenges the divisions between human and non-human. The paper investigates whether these dehumanizing discursive tactics of animalization, colonization, infantilism or vegetation, which are fundamentally oppressive, can become a means of resistance.
References
Armstrong Ph., The Postcolonial Animal, “Society & Animals” 2002, vol. 10 (4), pp. 413-419.
Atwood M., MaddAddam, Bloomsbury Publishing 2013, e-book.
Atwood M., Oryx and Crake, New York 2003.
Atwood M., Payback: Debt and the Shadow Side of Wealth, Toronto 2008, e-book.
Atwood M., The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake “In Context”, “PMLA” 2004, vol. 119 (3), pp. 513-517.
Atwood M., The Year of the Flood, New York 2010, e-book.
Barad K., Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter, “Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society” 2003, vol. 28 (3), pp. 801-831.
Bataille G., Erotism: Death and Sensuality, trans. M. Dalwood, San Francisco 1986.
Bhabha Homi K., The Location of Culture, London-New York 1994.
Bone J., Environmental Dystopias: Margaret Atwood and the Monstrous Child, “Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education” 2016, vol. 37 (5), pp. 627-640.
Bouson J. Brooks, “It’s Game Over Forever”: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake, “Journal of Commonwealth Literature” 2004, vol. 39 (3), pp. 139-156.
Canavan G., Hope, But Not for Us: Ecological Science Fiction and the End of the World in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, “Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory” 2012, vol. 23 (2), pp. 138-159.
Chikha Chokri B., Karel A., Staging/Caging “Otherness” in the Postcolony: Spectres of the Human Zoo, “Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies” 2013, vol. 27 (6), pp. 661-683.
Cooke G., Technics and the Human at Zero-Hour: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, “Studies in Canadian Literature” 2006, vol. 31 (2), pp. 105-125.
Fanon F., The Wretched of the Earth, trans. C. Farrington, preface J.P. Sartre, New York 1965.
Gibert T., Unraveling the Mysteries of Childhood: Metaphorical Portrayals of Children in Margaret Atwood’s Fiction, “ES Review: Spanish Journal of English Studies” 2018, vol. 39, pp. 29-50.
Hicks H.J., The Mother of All Apocalypses in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, [in:] The Post-Apocalyptic Novel in the Twenty-First Century: Modernity beyond Salvage,New York 2016, pp. 27-53.
Howells C.A., Margaret Atwood’s dystopian visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood, ed. C.A. Howells, Cambridge 2006, pp. 161-175.
Huang J., Being and Becoming: The Implications of Different Conceptualizations of Children and Childhood in Education, “Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education” 2019, vol. 10 (1), pp. 99-105.
Huggan G., Tiffin H., Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment, 2nd ed., London-New York 2015.
Ingersoll E.G., Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Novel Oryx and Crake, “Extrapolation” 2004, vol. 45 (2), pp. 162-175.
Johnston J.O., Animal-Human Hybrids: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, [in:] Posthuman Capital and Biotechnology in Contemporary Novels, New York 2019, pp. 67-101.
Kant I., What is Enlightenment?, [in:] P. Marvin, et al., Sources of the Western Tradition, vol. 2, 3rd ed., Boston 1995, pp. 56-57.
Ku Ch.-H., Of Monster and Man: Transgenics and Transgression in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, “Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies” 2006, vol. 32, pp. 107-133.
Mbembe A., Necropolitics, trans. S. Corcoran, Durham-London 2019.
Mohr D.M., Transgressive Utopian Dystopias: The Postmodern Reappearance of Utopia in the Disguise of Dystopia, “Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik” 2007, vol. 1, pp. 5-24.
Mosca V., Crossing Human Boundaries: Apocalypse and Posthumanism in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, “Altre Modernità” 2013, vol. 9, pp. 38-52.
Muzaffar H., Margaret Atwood’s Crakers and the Posthuman Future of Humanity, [in:] Bodies in Flux: Embodiments at the End of Anthropocentrism, eds. B. Braid, H. Muzaffar, Leiden-Boston 2019, pp. 149-164.
Ronduda Ł., Szerszeń T., Tu i teraz, [in:] Oświecenie, czyli tu i teraz, eds. Ł. Ronduda, T. Szerszeń, Kraków-Warszawa 2021, pp. 9-24.
Said E.W., Culture and Imperialism, New York 1994.
Silva de Sá M.C., Storytelling and Survival in Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, [in:] Prospero and Caliban Revisited: Brazilian Critical Perspectives on World Literature in English, eds. G.R. Gonçalves, J. de Paiva dos Santos, Faculdade de Letras da UFMG 2020, pp. 101-110.
Uprichard E., Children as “Being and Becomings”: Children, Childhood and Temporality, “Children & Society Volume” 2008, vol. 22, pp. 303-313.
Young-Bruehl E., Childism: Confronting Prejudice Against Children, New Haven-London 2012.
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Izabela Poręba
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors
Authors of texts accepted for publication in Przestrzenie Teorii are required to complete, sign and return to the editor's office the Agreement for granting a royalty-free license to works with a commitment to grant a CC sub-license.
Under the agreement, the authors of texts published in Przestrzenie Teorii grant the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań a non-exclusive, royalty-free license and authorize the use of Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license.
The authors retain the right to continue the free disposal of the work.
Users
Interested Internet users are entitled to use works published in Przestrzenie Teorii since 2015, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
- attribution - obligation to provide, together with the distributed work, information about the authorship, title, source (link to the original work, DOI) and the license itself.
- no derivatives - the work must be preserved in its original form, without the author's consent it is not possible to distribute the modified work, such as translations, publications, etc.
Copyrights are reserved for all texts published before 2015.
Miscellaneous
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań retains the right to magazines as a whole (layout, graphic form, title, cover design, logo etc.).