Abstract
The aim of the article is to present and analyse the key questions concerning the scope of the right to communicate the works to the public under Polish law. The provisions of the Polish Act on Copyright and Related Rights concerning the public communication right has changed in the last two decades due to the implementation of the European Union law. Furthermore, it follows from the recent ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) that the public communication right is fully harmonised in Article 3.1 of the Information Society Directive. Therefore, the interpretation of the scope of the public communication right in the CJEU’s judgments is crucialfor the correct application of the provisions of Polish law. The article commences with presentation of the development of the provisions of Polish Act on Copyright and Related Rights, then the most important rulings of the CJEU are discussed with the emphasis on the meaning of ‘the public’ and the level of harmonisation. Against this background the specific Polish provisions on the communication of broadcasts to the public are presented and the compliance with the EU law is questioned. In the last part the approach to the placing hyperlinks as an act constituting the public communications of works is compared in the CJEU’s ruling and the approach by Polish court.
References
Czajkowska-Dąbrowska, M. (2005), Glosa do wyroku SN z 18.11.2004r. V CK 243/04, OSP nr 11, poz. 129: 584-587.
Derclaye, E. (red.), (2009), Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright, Edward Elgar.
Hugenholtz, B., van Eechoud, M., van Gompel, S., Guibault, L., Helberger, N., Rossini, M., Steijger, L., Dufft, N., Bohn, P. (2006), The Recasting of Copyright and Related Rights for the Knowledge Economy, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Leistner, M. (2001), The German Federal Supreme Court’s Judgement on Google’s Image Search – A Topica Example of the „Limitations” of the European Approach to Exceptions and Limitations, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law” 42(4): 417-442.
Maletić, I. (2013), The Law and Policy of Harmonisation in Europe’s Internal Market, Cheltenham.
Moruń, K. (2007), Odpowiedzialność prawna za odesłania w Internecie, Przegląd Prawa Handlowego 13: 40-45.
Pihlajarinne, T. (2012), Setting the limits for the Implied License in Copyright and Linking Discourse – the European Perspective, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 43(6): 700-710.
Reinbothe, J., von Lewinski, S. (1993), The EC Directive on rental and lending rights and on piracy, London.
Szpringer, W. (2005), Linking i framing – czy nowe wyzwanie dla prawa Internetu?, Przegląd Ustawodawstwa Gospodarczego 4: 28-31.
Traple, E., (2013), Prawo komunikowania dzieła publiczności bezpośrednio i za pomocą różnych środków technicznych, w: System prawa prywatnego, t. 13: Prawo autorskie, red. J. Barta, Warszawa.
Wójcik, A. (2014), Glosa do wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w Katowicach z dnia 18 grudnia 2013 r. w sprawie ACa 524/13, Forum Prawnicze 3(23): 46-51.
License
Copyright (c) 2015 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.