THE ROLE OF ‘CULTURAL DEFENCE’ IN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

cultural defence
penal law
culture
multiculturalism

How to Cite

Kleczkowska, A. (2012). THE ROLE OF ‘CULTURAL DEFENCE’ IN CRIMINAL JURISDICTION. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny, 74(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.2.6

Number of views: 282


Number of downloads: 200

Abstract

The phenomenon of multiculturalism has its reflection in the growing importance of the concept of ‘cultural defence’ which is present in criminal jurisdiction. It means that a court will take into account the defendant’s cultural roots that might have influenced his behaviour. The debate in a courtroom regarding such cultural arguments touches upon the dogmatic as well as practical issues. While deliberating matters in which the ‘cultural defence’ appears, courts should first and foremost rule if the defendant can refer to such motivation of his actions at all. Next, the court must decide how to account for the cultural factor: whether as the cause for insanity, error facti, or error concerning the ignorance of law, etc. Agreeing upon both the facts of the case and fair assessment of the action may be a difficult task under the present legal system. It is also important not to allow to use ‘cultural defence’ against women’s rights. Codifying crimes with cultural basis may turn out impossible to achieve. Therefore, when carrying out proceedings, organs of the administration of justice should remember about the cultural background of certain crimes.
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.2.6
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Broeck J. Van, Cultural Defence and Culturally Motivated Crimes (Cultural Offences), „European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice” 9, 2001, nr 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718170120519282

D’hondt S., The Cultural Defense as Courtroom Drama: The Enactment of Identity, Sameness, and Difference in Criminal Trial Discourse, „Law & Social Inquiry” 35, 2010, Winter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2009.01178.x

Demain M., Fictions of Intentions in the „Cultural Defense”, „American Anthropologist” 110, 2008, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00076.x

Golding M.P., The Cultural Defense, „Ratio Juris” 15, 2002, nr 2 (June). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9337.00202

Good A., Cultural Evidence in Courts of Law, „Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute” 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00492.x

Kim N.S., Blameworthiness, Intent, and Cultural Dissonance: The Unequal Treatment of Cultural Defense Defendants, „University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy” 17, 2006, nr 2 (August).

Marek A., Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warszawa 2010.

Note, The Cultural Ddefense in the Criminal Law, „Harvard Law Review” 99, 1986, nr 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341255

Phillips A., When Culture Means Gender: Issues of Cultural Defence in English Courts, „The Modern Law Review” 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.6604002

Sitarz O., Cultural defence a polskie prawo karne, „Archiwum Kryminologii” 29-30, 2007-2008.

Sykuna S., J. Zajadło, Kontrowersje wokół tzw. obrony przez kulturę - okoliczność wyłączająca winę, okoliczność łagodząca czy nadużycie prawa do obrony?, „Przegląd Sądowy” czerwiec 2007.

Warylewski J., Zasada ustawowej określoności przesłanek odpowiedzialności karnej a kontratypy pozaustawowe, w: J. Maciejewski (red.), Okoliczności wyłączające bezprawność czynu (Materiały IV Bielańskiego Kolokwium Karnistycznego), Toruń 2008.

Zajadło J., Fascynujące ścieżki filozofii prawa, Warszawa 2008.