EVOLUTION OF THE SWEDISH ECONOMIC MODEL
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

Swedish model
folkhemmet
competitiveness (impact on)
R&D efficiency
cultural (institutional) impact on development

How to Cite

Winecki, J. (2012). EVOLUTION OF THE SWEDISH ECONOMIC MODEL. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny, 74(4), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.4.10

Number of views: 234


Number of downloads: 168

Abstract

The author looks at the emergence and evolution of the Swedish economic model (called herein: model 1.0) and confronts it with the performance of the economy. He stresses a particular feature of the Swedish history, namely the relation between the king and the peasantry, as the precondition for a successful introduction of the collectivist folkhemmet model, based on a large public (social) sector and egalitarian wages and income policies. This model was pursued determinedly (despite the slowly deteriorating performance of the economy) until the acute crisis of the early 1990s. Under its impact the model has been cut in size (from approx. 70% GDP to 50% GDP now) and modified in terms of access to various benefits (in order to reduce ‘free riding’). The modified model, called here: model 2.0, has few characteristics of the model 1.0 and is barely distinguishable from the more general European social model. The author evaluates the impact of the Swedish model (1.0) on the performance of the economy in negative terms. Partial evidence is supplied by improved performance after the crisis-generated reforms, with a faster growth of labour productivity, and greater international competitiveness of the Swedish manufacturing in the post mid-1990s period. These were spurred by the cuts in public expenditures and taxes (and resulting stronger incentives for individuals), as well as enhanced economic and civic freedoms. However, even the modified model 2.0 is still hobbled by the egalitarian wage structure, low R&D efficiency, with the resultant inability of the economy to create private sector jobs. Altogether, the author’s opinion is that whatever positive effects have been registered by the Swedish economic performance, they resulted from the impact of the history-shaped institutions (including the protestant ethics) and earlier successes of the liberal Swedish economy, which in the period of 1860-1950 grew the fastest in the world, preceding the expansion of the collectivist Swedish model.
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.4.10
PDF (Język Polski)

References

Arfwedson J., J. Munkhammar, Searching for a Swedish Model, „Wall Street Journal” 25.05.2005.

Baumol W.J., Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crises, „American Economic Review” 57, nr 3: 415-426.

Black Hole, „The Economist” 28.08.1999.

Eklund K., Sveriges tillvaxtproblem, w: Marknad och politik, Dialogos, Lund 1994.

GEM, Sweden 2012 Report, 19 June 2012.

Kubitsky J., Alfabet szwedzki, Difin, Warszawa 2011.

McKinsey Global Institute, Sweden’s Economic Performance: Recent Development, Current Priorities. Synthesis, May 2006.

Myrdal M., G. Myrdal, Kris i befolkningsfragan, Stockholm 1934.

Rojas M., Sweden after the Swedish model. From Tutorial State to Enabling State, Timbro, Stockholm 2005.

Sanandaji N., The Swedish Model Reassessed, Libera, Helsinki, October 2011.

Segerfeldt F., The Not-So-Super Model, „Wall Street Journal” 2.01.2006.

Szaleniec M., W. Majerkiewicz, Historia inflacji (cz. III), NBPortal, 6 maja 2008 r.

Winiecki J., The BRIC Group – How Strong a Challenge to the West?, „World Economics” 13, 2012, nr 2.

Winiecki J., The Distorted World of Soviet-Type Economies, Routledge, London, and Pittsburgh University Press, 1988.

Winiecki J., Economic Prospects – East and West, Centre for Research into Communist Economies, London 1987.

Winiecki J., Kryzys strefy euro i jego źródła w funkcjonowaniu państwa opiekuńczego, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 74, 2012, z. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.1.7

Zienkowski L., Wiedza a wzrost gospodarczy, Scholar, Warszawa 2003.