The concept of Index for the Assessment of Regulations' Significance (IARS) in regulatory impact evaluation
PDF

Keywords

regulatory impact assessment
ex-post evaluation
index for the assessment of regulations’ significance
parliamentary scrutiny
JEL
K1
K4

How to Cite

Marchewka-Bartkowiak, K. (2019). The concept of Index for the Assessment of Regulations’ Significance (IARS) in regulatory impact evaluation. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny, 81(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2019.81.2.13

Number of views: 456


Number of downloads: 321

Abstract

This article aims to present the concept of the Index for the Assessment of Regulations’ Significance as a tool used in parliamentary regulatory impact assessment, with a special focus on expost assessment. The Index is an element of the broadly defined economic analysis of law, which can facilitate a more effective scrutiny of parliamentary lawmaking. The Index also enables the
RIA (Regulatory Impact Assessment) to be verified by the act originator at the stage of the ex-ante regulatory impact assessment. Furthermore, the Index can also serve as a tool for conducting an analysis of the overall legislation process employed in parliament over a given period of time, on the basis of the adopted legal and substantive criteria.
https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2019.81.2.13
PDF

References

BAS (2015). Methodological assumptions for ex-ante and ex-post analysis. Bureau of Research, Chancellery of the Sejm 2015, working group research – document unpublished (Polish version: Założenia metodologiczne do analizy ex-ante i ex-post, prace zespołu roboczego ds. OSR pod kierunkiem G. Gołębiowskiego).

COM(2010)543 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Smart Regulation in the European Union, Brussels, 8.10.2010.

COM(2012)746 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, EU Regulatory Fitness.

Cooter, R., Ulen, T. (2008). Law and Economics. Pearson Addison Wesley, Boston−San Francisco−New-York−London−Toronto−Sydney−Tokyo−Singapore−Madrid−Mexico City−Munich−Paris−Cape Town−Hong Kong− Montreal.

ECPRD (2016). Member States’ parliamentary practice and organization regarding impact assessment (ex-ante) and evaluation (ex-post). European Parliament, Request 2832.

OECD (2012). Recommendation of the Council on Regulatory Policy and Governance. Paris.

OECD (2015). Government at a Glance 2015. Paris.

Pearson, H. (1997). Origins of Law and Economics. The Economists’ New Science of Law Movement 1830–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Posner, R.A. (2003). Economic Analysis of Law. New York: Aspen Publishers.

Rowley, Ch.K. (1989). Public choice and the economic analysis of law, [in:] N. Mercuro (ed.), Law and Economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.