Pecking order of companies’ financing sources in the context of stock liquidity in the capital market
PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

pecking order theory
sources of financing
information asymmetry
stock liquidity
retained earnings

How to Cite

Stereńczak, S., & Kubiak, J. (2024). Pecking order of companies’ financing sources in the context of stock liquidity in the capital market. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny I Socjologiczny, 86(3), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.3.13

Number of views: 106


Number of downloads: 58

Abstract

This paper aims to assess whether stock liquidity is related to the use of particular financing sources. Previous research indicates that stock liquidity mitigates the adverse effects of information asymmetry, suggesting that it may also influence companies’ choice of financing sources. The research sample consists of companies listed in fourteen Central and Eastern European countries. A set of statistical and econometric methods were used to test the hypotheses, in particular the Tobit models and the extended model of Shyam-Sunders and Myers (1999). The findings indicate that companies with more liquid shares finance their operations to a lesser extent from retained earnings than companies with less liquid shares. Thus, stock liquidity differentiates companies in terms of their preference for internal financing. The findings also suggest that stock liquidity differentiates companies’ choices of external financing sources. To a greater extent, however, this relates to the liquidity of a country’s entire equity market, rather than the liquidity of an individual company’s shares. The relationships between stock liquidity and the level of retained earnings, and between stock liquidity and the choice of external financing sources, are more pronounced in the group of companies more prone to the adverse effects of information asymmetry. This, in turn, confirms that stock liquidity affects the pecking order of corporate financing sources by alleviating the adverse effects of information asymmetry. The findings may be useful in particular for managers and market regulators as a motivation to improve the liquidity of listed shares.

https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.3.13
PDF (Język Polski)

Funding

National Science Centre (Poland) agreement no. 217/27/N/HS4/00751

References

Ahangar, N. A. (2021). Stock liquidity and corporate debt maturity structure: Evidences from Indian firms. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(7), 1754–1764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3342

Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431

Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: Cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5, 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-4181(01)00024-6

Amihud, Y., i Mendelson, H. (2000). The liquidity route to a lower cost of capital. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12(4), 7–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2000.tb00016.x

Bakri, M. A., Nordin, B. A. A., Tunde, M. B., i Theng, L. W. (2020). Moderating role of financial market development on the relationship between stock liquidity and dividend. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(2), 77–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21315/aamjaf2020.16.2.4

Brogaard, J., Li, D., i Xia, Y. (2017). Stock liquidity and default risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 124(3), 486–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.03.003

Chan, K., Cheng, S., i Hameed, A. (2022). Investor Heterogeneity and Liquidity. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(7), 2798–2833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109022000217

Chen, W., Zhang, W., Lv, Z., i Zou, G. (2022). Liquidity around SEO announcements: Evidence from China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(2), 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1754253

Chen, Z., Gao, K., i Huang, W. (2020). Stock liquidity and excess leverage. Finance Research Letters, 32, 101178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.034

Chojnacka, E. (2011). Analiza determinant zmian poziomu zadłużenia przy wykorzystaniu regresji kwantylowej. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, 38, 341–352.

Chung, K. H., i Zhang, H. (2014). A simple approximation of intraday spreads using daily data. Journal of Financial Markets, 17(1), 94–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2013.02.004

Cotei, C., i Farhat, J. B. (2009). The trade-off theory and the pecking order theory: Are they mutually exclusive? North American Journal of Finance and Banking Research, 3(3), 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1404576

Czerwonka, L., i Jaworski, J. (2021). Capital structure determinants of small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 28(2), 277–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2020-0326

Czerwonka, L., i Jaworski, J. (2022). Capital structure and its determinants in companies originating from two opposite sides of the European Union: Poland and Portugal. Economics and Business Review, 8(1), 24–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2022.1.3

De Jong, A., Verbeek, M., i Verwijmeren, P. (2010). The impact of financing surpluses and large financing deficits on tests of the pecking order theory. Financial Management, 39(2), 733–756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01090.x

DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., i Stulz, R. M. (2006). Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: A test of the life-cycle theory. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(2), 227–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.07.005

Dewasiri, N. J., Yatiwelle Koralalage, W. B., Abdul Azeez, A., Jayarathne, P. G. S. A., Kuruppuarachchi, D., i Weerasinghe, V. A. (2019). Determinants of dividend policy: Evidence from an emerging and developing market. Managerial Finance, 45(3), 413–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2017-0331

Donaldson, G. (1961). Corporate debt capacity: A study of corporate debt policy and the determination of corporate debt capacity. Harvard University. Ee, M. S., Hasan, I., i Huang, H. (2022). Stock liquidity and corporate labor investment. Journal of Corporate Finance, 72, 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102142

Fama, E. F., i French, K. R. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay? Journal of Financial Economics, 60(1), 3–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00038-1

Fama, E. F. i French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.1.1

Fong, K. Y. L., Holden, C. W., i Trzcinka, C. A. (2017). What are the best liquidity proxies for global research? Review of Finance, 21(4), 1355–1401. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfx003

Frank, M. Z., Goyal, V. K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 217–248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00252-0

Greene, W. H. (1981). On the asymptotic bias of the ordinary least squares estimator of the tobit model. Econometrica, 49(2), 505–513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1913323

Guo, J. (2016). Ultimate controlling shareholders and dividend payout policy in Chinese stock market. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 19(2), 1–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091516500089

Halov, N. (2006). Dynamics of asymmetric information and capital structure. https://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~nhalov/Halov.pdf

Harris, M., i Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 297–355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03753.x

Hasan, I., Jackowicz, K., Kowalewski, O., i Kozłowski, Ł. (2017). Do local banking market structures matter for SME financing and performance? New evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Banking and Finance, 79, 142–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.03.009

Hernádi, P., i Ormos, M. (2012). What managers think of capital structure and how they act: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Baltic Journal of Economics, 12(2), 47–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2012.10840517

Jabbouri, I. (2016). Determinants of corporate dividend policy in emerging markets: Evidence from MENA stock markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 37, 283–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.01.018

Jaworski, J., i Czerwonka, L. (2019). Meta-study on relationship between macroeconomic and institutional environment and internal determinants of enterprises ’ capital structure. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2614–2637. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1650653

Jiang, F., Ma, Y., i Shi, B. (2017). Stock liquidity and dividend payouts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 42, 295–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.12.005

Kaźmierska-Jóźwiak, B. (2015). Determinants of dividend policy: Evidence from Polish listed companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 473–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00490-6

Koralun-Bereźnicka, J. (2018). Firm size and debt maturity as indirect determinants of capital structure: Evidence form European panel data. Applied Economics Letters, 25(18), 1319–1322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2017.1420869

Moin, A., Guney, Y., i El Kalak, I. (2020). The effects of ownership structure, sub-optimal cash holdings and investment inefficiency on dividend policy: Evidence from Indonesia. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 55, 857–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00862-z

Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2327916

Myers, S. C., i Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), 435–480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053

Pham, T. P., Singh, H., i Vu, V. H. (2023). The impact of bank loan announcements on stock liquidity. International Review of Economics and Finance, 86, 848–864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.02.009

Qu, W., Wongchoti, U., Wu, F., i Chen, Y. (2018). Does information asymmetry lead to higher debt financing? Evidence from China during the NTS Reform period. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 25(1), 109–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-04-2018-0006

Shen, C. H. (2014). Pecking order, access to public debt market, and information asymmetry. International Review of Economics and Finance, 29, 291–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2013.06.002

Shyam-Sunder, L., i Myers, S. C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 219–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00051-8

Stereńczak, S., i Kubiak, J. (2022). Dividend policy and stock liquidity: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101727

Wang, X., i Wei, S. (2021). Does the investment horizon of institutional investors matter for stock liquidity? International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101648

Yusof, Y., i Ismail, S. (2016). Determinants of dividend policy of public listed companies in Malaysia. Review of International Business and Strategy, 26(1), 88–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-02-2014-0030