Keywords
Hague conventions
recognition and enforcement
private international law
How to Cite
Number of views: 144
Number of downloads: 114
Abstract
This review article is inspired by monograph The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention: Cornerstones, Prospects, Outlook edited by Matthias Weller, João Ribeiro-Bidaoui, Moritz Brinkmann and Nina Dethloff (Hart Publishing, 2023), and its presentation at a conference of the same title that took place on 9–10 July 2023 in Bonn (Germany). The monograph was dedicated to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters concluded in The Hague on 2 July 2019, under the auspices of the Hague Conference of Private International Law (HCCH). The book was published four years after conclusion of the Convention and just before its entry into force on 1 September 2023. The authors of particular chapters were speakers at the aforementioned conference. The Hague Judgments Convention (2019) is just a part of the international unification of civil procedure that is progressing under the auspices of the HCCH, with particular stress being placed on the jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters. Lawyers working within the framework of the HCCH hoped for a universal convention on the jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in civil and commercial matters that would mirror the European Brussels regime. The publication is the point of departure for an analysis of the unification of law and the role of international doctrine and international organizations in that process. Selected provisions of the Convention are subject to in-depth analysis, especially those that are illustrative of modern legislative trends (like the bilateralization of multilateral international agreements).
References
Beaumont, P. (2009). Reflections on the relevance of public international law to private international law treaty making. Recueil des cours / L’Académie de droit international de La Haye, 340, 9–61.
Blixen, Karen. (2022). Out of Africa. Tingle Books.
Bogdanowicz, P., i Taborowski, M. (2023). The independence criterion for national courts in the preliminary reference procedure after Banco de Santander: Still the joker in the deck? Common Market Law Review, 60(3), 763–796. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2023051
Borger, V. (2022). Constitutional identity, the rule of law, and the power of the purse: The ECJ approves the conditionality mechanism to protect the Union budget: Hungary and Poland v. Parliament and Council. Common Market Law Review, 59(6), 1771–1802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2022118
Brachotte, S. (2023). Pour une approche décoloniale du droit international privé. Revue Critique de Droit International Privé, 2, 297–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rcdip.232.0297
Cameron, D. (2019). For the record. William Collins.
Collins of Mapesbury, Lord, i Harris, J. (red.). (2022). Dicey, Morris and Collins on the conflict of laws (wyd. 17, tom 1). Sweet & Maxwell.
Crawford, J. (2019). Brownlie’s principles of public international law (wyd. 9). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198737445.001.0001
d’Ornano, A. (2024). Le Royaume-Uni signe La Convention de La Haye du 2 juilliet 2019. Revue critique de droit international privé, 1, 165–167.
Ereciński, T. (1998). Księga pierwsza. Jurysdykcja krajowa. W: J. Ciszewski i T. Ereciński, Komentarz do kodeksu postępowania cywilnego. Część trzecia. Przepisy z zakresu międzynarodowego prawa cywilnego. Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.
Farrington, F. (2022). A return to the doctrine of forum non conveniens after Brexit and the implications for corporate accountability. Journal of Private International Law, 18, 399–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2022.2151092
Foster, P., Strauss, D., i Parker, G. (2023, 19 maja). Why the watered-down EU law bill remains mired in controversy. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/d515a617-15d0-457fa3df-873524a4bc67
Herrup, P., i Brand, R. A. (2023). A Hague Parallel Proceedings Convention: Architecture and features. Chicago Journal of International Law Online, 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4170254
Jacobs, H. (2021). Das Haager Anerkennungs- und Vollstreckungsübereinkommen vom 2. Juli 2019. Eine systematische und rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung. Mohr Siebeck.
Lehmann, M. (2023). Incremental international law-making: The Hague Jurisdiction Project in context. Journal of Private International Law, 19, 25–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2023.2189077
Loon, J. H. A. van (1987). The Hague Conventions on Private International Law. W: F. Jacobs, S. Roberts (red.), The Effects of treaties in domestic law (s. 221–251). Sweet & Maxwell.
Lutzi, T. (2023, 18 czerwca). The Visible College of International Lawyers and the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention – Conference in Bonn. ConflictofLaws.net. https://conflictoflaws.net/2023/the-visible-college-of-international-lawyers-and-the-hcch-2019-judgmentsconvention-conference-in-bonn/
Martufi, A. (2022). Effective judicial protection and the European arrest warrant: Navigating between procedural autonomy and mutual trust. Common Market Law Review, 59(5), 1371–1408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2022095
Mataczyński, M. (2009). Umowy dotyczące jurysdykcji na tle konwencji haskiej z 30 czerwca 2005 r. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 10, 49–58.
Mataczyński, M. (2010). Jeszcze o umowach dotyczących jurysdykcji na tle konwencji haskiej z 30 czerwca 2005 r. Przegląd Prawa Handlowego, 2, 51–53.
Mostowik, P. (2023a). Refleksje o współczesnym międzynarodowym prawie prywatnym i postępowaniu cywilnym na tle ujęcia „jurisdykcyi krajowej zewnętrznej” F. Słotwińskiego. W: P. Mostowik, E. Figura-Góralczyk, R. Flejszar i B. Gnela, Prawne zagadnienia międzynarodowego obrotu cywilnego i handlowego (s. 175–183). C. H. Beck.
Mostowik, P. (red.). (2023b). Międzynarodowe prawo rodzinne. Filiacja. Piecza nad dzieckiem. Alimentacja. Wolters Kluwer.
Murzynowski, A. (1994). Istota i zasady procesu karnego (wyd. 3). Wolters Kluwer.
Olearchyk, R. (2023, 16 maja). Ukraine detains Supreme Court chief justice on suspicion of bribery. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/87baf538-2282-4bd4-a492-12ea17213c72
Pech, L., i Kochenov, D. (red.). (2021). Respect for the rule of law in the case law of the European Court of Justice: A casebook overview of key judgments since the Portuguese judges case. Sieps.
Piechowiak, M. (2015). Moralne aspekty lustracji. O destrukcji moralności przez prawo i niekonstytucyjności pewnych form lustracji. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica, 27, 37–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.27.03
Sadurski, W. (2019). Poland’s constitutional breakdown. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840503.001.0001
Salaymeh, L., i Michaels, R. (2022). Decolonial comparative law: A conceptual beginning. Rabels Zeitschrift, 86(1), 166–188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1628/rabelsz-2022-0007
Taborowski, M. (2019). Mechanizmy ochrony praworządności państw członkowskich w prawie Unii Europejskiej – studium przebudzenia systemu ponadnarodowego. Wolters Kluwer.
Weller, M. (2022). “Mutual Trust”: A suitable foundation for private international law in regional integration communities and beyond? Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law – Recueil des cours (tom 423). Brill.
Wołodkiewicz, B. (2022). Europejskie prawo procesowe cywilne po brexicie. Państwo i Prawo, 77(3), 38–53.
Zalisko, M. (2023). Uznawanie i wykonywanie orzeczeń sądowych na gruncie rozporządzenia Bruksela I bis oraz konwencji haskiej z 2019 r. W: P. Mostowik, E. Figura-Góralczyk, R. Flejszar i B. Gnela (red.), Prawne zagadnienia międzynarodowego obrotu cywilnego i handlowego (s. 303–326). C. H. Beck.
Zoll, A. (2016). Sposób wyboru sędziów Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 78(1), 43–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2016.78.1.4
License
Copyright (c) 2024 WPiA UAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.