Abstrakt
The paper focuses on longer poems by the court poet Claudian that depict a State ruined by evil forces or the state of harmony. This poet from late Antiquity uses a vocabulary related to death and destruction. Evil, above all barbarians and political opponents, is also presented appropriately by the poet. Their characters function in the poems as disaster, ruin and ignominy. To depict these evil forces, their repeatability and how they are overcome on different levels, the poet uses the motive of the upward and downward movement, describing a dead character‘s way up to heaven and down to the underworld. Destruction rises from this movement of evil to the upper world, while the movement down to the underworld carries liberation and peace. Nevertheless, the poet implies, that the state of harmony is never definitive. Destruction and ruin repeat and recur in different forms in the poems, from the mythological past up to the present. In this sense, the characters in these poems function within a time loop and the story world presents the poet’s view on history and how it works on the divine and human level.
Bibliografia
Claudien. Oeuvres, tome II, Poèmes politiques: (395–398), texte établi et traduit par J.-L. Charlet. Les Belles Lettres (Collection des Universites de France publiee sous la patronage de l‘Association Guillaume Bude): Paris 2000.
Horace, selected odes and Satire 1.9, 2nd Edition Revised, ed. R. Ancona, Mundelein-Illinois 2014.
Livius Titus. Ab urbe condita libri, ed. W. Weissenborn. Berlin 1873.
Livius Titus. Ab urbe condita, ed. R. S. Conway, Ch. F. Walters. Oxford 1914.
M. Annaeus Lucanus. Pharsaliae Libri X, rec. C. H. Weise, G. Bassus, Leipzig 1835.
Marcellinus Ammianus. Res Gestae, ed. J. C. Rolfe. Cambridge 1935–1940.
Marcellinus Ammianus. Res Gestae, Vol. II, ed. W. Seyfarth. Stuttgart, Leipzig 1999.
Ovid. Metamorphoses: Books IX-XV. Trans. F. J. Miller. Loeb Classical Library 43: Cambridge 1916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/DLCL.ovid-metamorphoses.1916
Platon. Państwo. Przeł. W. Witwicki. Kęty 2003.
Seneca L. Annaeus. Die kleinen Dialoge, Band I, Lateinisch-Deutsch, hrsg., ubers. und mit einer Einf. vers. von G. Fink. München 1992.
Vellei Paterculi Historiarum ad M. Vinicium cosulem libri duo (1988), ed. W. S. Watt. Leipzig 1988.
Vergil. Aeneid, Book 8, adapted from the commentaries of T.E. Page by J. J. O’ Hara: Cambridge 2018.
Bauman 2018: Z. Bauman, Retrotopia. Jak rządzi nami przeszłość. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.6.22
Charlet 1988: J.-L. Charlet, Aesthetic Trends in Late Latin Poetry (325–410). ,,Philologus“ 132 (1988). 77–78, 80–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1988.132.12.74
Connor 1993: P. Connor, Epic in Mind: Claudian’s De raptu Proserpinae. In: A.J. Boyle (ed.), Roman Epic. London 1993. 248.
Coombe 2014: C. Coombe, A Hero in our Midst: Stilicho as a Literary Construct in the Poetry of Claudian. In: L. Van Hoof, P. Van Nuffelen (ed.), Literature and Society in the Fourth Century AD: Performing Paideia, Constructing the Present, Presenting the Self. Mnemosyne Supplements
(Monographs on Greek and Latin Language and Literature), T. 373. Leiden 2014. 159.
Coombe 2018: C. Coombe, Claudian The Poet. Cambridge 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107415645
Christiansen 1969: P. G. Christainsen, The use of images by Claudius Claudianus. Studies in classical literature 7. Mouton 1969.
Christiansen 1996: P.G. Christiansen, Claudian versus the Opposition. ,,Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association“ (1996). 97.49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2936001
Duc 1994: T. Duc, Le ‘De raptu Proserpinae‘ de Claudien. ,,Europäische Hochschulschriften“, Reihe XV Bd. 67 (1994). 243.
Dunsch 2013: B. Dunsch,‘Describe nunc tempestatem’. Sea Storm and Shipwreck Type Scenes in Ancient Literature. In: C. Thompson (ed.), Shipwreck in Art and Literature. Images and Interpretations from Antiquity to the Present Day. London: Routledge 2013. 42–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079683-3
Dutsch 1991: D. Dutsch, Is Claudian’s De raptu Proserpinae a non-political poem? ,,Eos“, 79 (1991). 217–222.
Feeney 1991: D. Feeney, The Gods in Epic. Oxford 1991.
Feldherr 2010: A. Feldherr, Playing Gods. Ovid’s Metamorphoses and The Politics of Fiction. Princeton University Press 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400836543
Gualandri 2013: I. Gualandri, Claudian, from Easterner to Westerner. ,,Talanta” XLV (2013). 117.
Hofeneder 2008: A. Hofeneder, C. Iulius Solinus als Quelle für die keltische Religion. In: A. Sartori (ed.), Dedicanti e cultores nelle religione celtiche (Quaderni di Acme), 104. Mailand 2008.143.
Kast 1994: V. Kast, Angst und Faszination. Emotionen in bezug auf das Fremde. In: H. Egner (ed.), Das Eigene und das Fremde. Angst und Faszination. Solothurn und Düsseldorf 1994. 214–237.
Kellner 1997: T. Kellner, Die Göttergestalten in Claudians De raptu Proserpinae: Polarität und Koinzidenz als anthropozentrische Dialektik mythologisch formulierter Weltvergewisserung, T. 106. Beiträge zur Altertumskunde. Stuttgard, Leipzig 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110934656
Levy 1971: H. L. Levy, Claudian‘s In Rufinum : an exegetical commentary. With an appendix containing the author’s 1935 ed. of the text with introd. and textual commentary, Philological monographs of the American Philological Association. Band 30. Detroit 1971.
Mazzara 2003: F. Mazzara, Persephone: her mythical return to Sicily. E-journal del Dipartimento di Arti e Co-municazioni dell’Università di Palermo (2003). 16.
Miller 2009: P.A. Miller, Latin Verse Satire. An Anthology and Reader. London, New York 2009.
Moore 1910: C. H. Moore, Rome’s Heroic past in the Poems of Claudian. ,,The Classical Journal“, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1910). 111.
Musialska 2002: I. Musialska, Rzymskie poczucie czasu i biegu historii. ,,Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae” 14 (2002). 115–125.
Newsom 1988: R. Newsom, A Likely Story: Probability and Play in Fiction. New Brunswick 1988.
Parkes 2005: R. Parkes, Model Youths? Achilles and Parthenopaeus In Claudian’s Panegyrics on the Third and Fourth Consulships of Honorius. ,,Illinois Classical Studies” 30 (2005). 67–82.
Parkes 2015: R. Parkes, Erotic and martial poetics in Claudian‘s De Raptu Proserpinae. ,,The Classical Journal“ 110 (4) (2015). 471, 474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5184/classicalj.110.4.0471
Petrounias 1976: E. Petrounias, Funktion und Thematik der Bilder bei Aischylos. ,,Hypomnemata: Untersuchungen zur Antike und zu ihrem Nachleben“, H. 48. A. Dihle, H. Erbse (ed.), 1976. 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666251399
Petry 2016: M. Petry, Klaudian a barbarzyńcy: inwektywa przeciw Rufinusowi. In: A. Głowacka--Penczyńska, J. Żychlińska (ed.), Inny, obcy, potwór: kulturowo-społeczne aspekty odmienności przez wieki. Bydgoszcz 2016. 347–353.
Petry 2017: M. Petry, Die Art des Lobes: Vergil und Claudians zwei Panegyriken. ,,Eos“ CIV(2), Breslau 2017. 330.
Petry 2018: M. Petry, Barbari inmanes. Okrucieństwo barbarzyńców na wybranych przykładach z literatury rzymskiej. In: E. Wesołowska, W. Szturc (ed.), Crudelitas. Okrucieństwo w literaturze i kulturze europejskiej. Poznań 2018. 93–102.
Schindler 2009: C. Schindler, Claudius Claudianus. Der Archeget spätantiker Verspanegyrik im lateinischen Westen. In: C. Schindler, Per carmina laudes. Untersuchungen zur spätantiken Verspanegyrik von Claudian bis Coripp (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 253). Berlin 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110210583
Schmidt 1976: P. L. Schmidt, Politik und Dichtung in der Panegyrik Claudians. Konstanz 1976.
Smolak 2007: K. Smolak, Epic Poetry as Exegesis: ,,The Song of the Good War” (Eupolemius). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160699.i-364.40
In: W.Otten, K. Pollmann (ed.), Poetry and Exegesis in Premodern Latin Christianity: The Encounter Between Classical and Christian Strategies of Interpretation (Supplements To Vigiliae Christianae: Texts And Studies Of Early Christian Life And Language), T. 87. Leiden. Boston 2007. 240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004160699.i-364
Soldevila 2006: R.M. Soldevila, Martial, Book IV: A Commentary (Mnemosyne Supplements). Leiden, Boston 2006.
Steinbeiß 1936: H. Steinbeiß, Das Geschichtsbild Claudians. Halle 1936.
Taylor 1875: T. Taylor, The Eleusinian and Bacchic Mysteries. New York 1875.
Tsai 2007: K. Tsai, Hellish Love: Genre in Claudian’s De Raptu Proserpinae. ,,Helios“ 34 (2007). 37–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2007.0004
Ware 2004: C. Ware, Claudian, Vergil and the Two Battles of Frigidus. In: R. Rees (ed.), Romane memento: Vergil in the fourth century. London 2004.
Ware 2011: C. Ware, Proserpina and the Martyrs: Pagan and Christian in late Antiquity. In: E. Mullins and D. Scully (ed.), Listen O Isles Unto Me: Studies in Medieval Word and Image in Honour of Jennifer O’Reilly. Cork 2011. 16–27.
Ware 2012: C. Ware, Claudian and The Roman Epic Tradition. Cambridge 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004152
Ware 2013: C. Ware, Learning from Pliny: Claudian’s Advice to the Emperor Honorius. ,,Arethusa“ 46 (2013). 313–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2013.0016
Wheeler 1995: S.M. Wheeler, The Underworld Opening of Claudian’s De raptu Proserpinae. ,,Transactions of the American Philological Association“, 125 (1995). 114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/284348
Żurek 1973: G. Żurek, Motyw złotego wieku w twórczości Klaudiana. ,,Meander” 7–8 (1973). 292–293.
Leick 2017: R. Leick, ,,Blick zurück nach vorn“. Der Spiegel, 44. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/literaturspiegel/d-153989768.html [13.09.2020].