Zenon z Elei – doksografia i fragmenty (Zeno of Elea – doxography and fragments)

Main Article Content

Marian Wesoły

Abstrakt

After a very general exegetical introduction, we put forward a new arrangement and translation of the major testimonies on Zeno of Elea. The few passages that are generally regarded as fragmenta verbatim are also cited in the original. The source material is presented in a reconstructive order that is somewhat different from the previous editions of Zeno. Our aim is to capture the specific problematic context of the ancient authors who refer and question Zeno’s arguments, without isolating and break up theses texts. The particular passages have been provided with thematic headings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Wesoły, M. (2013). Zenon z Elei – doksografia i fragmenty (Zeno of Elea – doxography and fragments). Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae Et Latinae, 23(2), 69-96. Pobrano z https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/sppgl/article/view/5733
Dział
COMMENTATIONES AD LITTERAS GRAECAS SPECTANTES

Bibliografia

  1. Gemelli Marciano M. L., Die Vorsokratiker, II, Mannheim 2009, 96–137.
  2. Graham D.W., The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy. The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of Major Presocratics, Cambridge 2010, 245–272.
  3. Lee H. D. P., Zeno of Elea, a text, with translations and notes, Cambridge 1936 (Amsterdam 1967).
  4. Mansfeld J., Die Vorsokratiker, Stuttgart 2011, 342–391.
  5. Untersteiner M., Zenone. Testimonianze e frammenti, Firenze 1963 [Przedruk w: Eleati. Testimonianze e frammenti, Milano 2011].
  6. Barnes J., Zenone e l’infinito, L.Rossetti, M.Pulpito (eds.), Sankt Augustin 2011.
  7. Berti E., Zenone di Elea inventore della dialettica?, „La Parola del Passato” 43, 1988, 19–41.
  8. Calenda G., Epistemologia greca del VI e V secolo a.C.. Eraclito e gli Eleati, Roma 2011, 219–264.
  9. Caveing M., Zénon d’Elée. Prolégomenes aux doctrines du continu. Etudes historique et critique des fragments et téstimonages, Paris 1982.
  10. Curd P., Eleatic monism in Zeno and Melissus, „Ancient Philosophy” 13, 1993, 1–22.
  11. Eberle S., Das Zeit-Raum-Kontinuum bei Zenon von Elea, „Philosophisches Jahrbuch” 105, 1998, 85–99.
  12. Fano V., Paradossi di Zenone, Roma 2012.
  13. Faris J. A., The Paradoxes of Zeno, Aldershot: Avebury 1996.
  14. Ferber R., Zenon Paradoxien der Bewegung und die Struktur von Raum und Zeit, München 1981 (Stuttgart l995).
  15. Grunbaum A., Modern Science and Zeno’s Paradoxes, London 1968.
  16. Hasper P. S., Zeno unlimited, „Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy” 30, 2006, 49–85.
  17. Комарова В.Я., Учение Зенона Элейского: попытка реконструкции системы аргументов, Ленинград 1988.
  18. Magidor O., Another Notes on Zeno’s Arrow, „Phronesis” 53, 2008, 359–372.
  19. Matson W. I., Zeno Moves!, w: Before Plato, ed. by A. Press, New York 2001, 87–108.
  20. Migliori M., Unita, molteplicità, dialettica. Contributi per una riscoperta di Zenone di Elea, Milano 1984.
  21. Palmer, J. Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy, Oxford 2009, rozdz. 5.
  22. Papa – Grimaldi A., Why mathematical solutions of Zeno’s paradoxes miss the point: Zeno’s one and many reaction and Parmenides’ prohibition, „Rewiev od Mataphysics” 50, 1996–97, 299–314.
  23. Rapp Ch., Zeno and the Eleatic Anti-Pluralism, [w:] La costruzione del discorso filosofico, Pisa 2006, 161–182.
  24. Rapp Ch., Zenon aus Elea, [w:] Flashar H. u. a. (hrsg.): Frühgriechische Philosophie (= Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie. Die Philosophie der Antike, Band 1), Halbband 2, Basel 2013, 531–572.
  25. Rossetti L., Sull’intreccio di logica e retorica in alcuni paradossi di Zenone di Elea, „Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie” 74, 1992, 1–25.
  26. Salmon W.C. (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes, Indianapolis 1970.
  27. Silagadze Z. K., Zeno meets modern science, „Acta Physica Polonica” 36, 2005, 2887–2893.
  28. Tóth I., I paradossi di Zenone nel ‘Parmenide’ di Platone, Napoli 1994.
  29. Wesoły M., Parmenides z Elei – physikos i “Parmenides” Platona – dialektikos: Perspektywy nowej interpretacji, „Sprawy Wschodnie” 1–2, 2006, 53–67.