Keywords
incest
language
inguistics
tragic irony
How to Cite
Number of views: 89
Number of downloads: 89
Abstract
This paper deals with the linguistic aspect of tragic irony in the Oedipus Rex. It begins with the observation that several ambiguous expressions in the play telegraph their double meaning through various kinds of linguistic slips. It is argued that these slips occur on three distinct levels: semantics, syntax and pragmatics. There follows an analysis of several examples under each of these three headings. The paper concludes with the observation that when it comes to the question of Oedipus’ familial relationships and the legitimacy of his rule in Thebes, language itself fails the hero and defies his attempts at controlling it.
References
Bollack 1991: J. Bollock, L’OEdipe Roi de Sophocle, V. 1–4, Lille 1991.
Cairns 1993: D.L. Cairns, Aidōs. The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature, Oxford 1993.
Dawe 1982: R.D. Dawe, Sophocles: Oedipus Rex, Cambridge 1982.
Drew Griffith 1993: R. Drew-Griffith, Oedipus Pharmakos? Alleged Scapegoating in Sophocles’ Oedipus the King, “Phoenix” 47 (1993), 95–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1088579
Finglass 2018: P.J. Finglass, Sophocles: Oedipus the King. Cambridge 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0293
Foley 1993: H. Foley, Oedipus as Pharmakos, in: Nomodeiktes. Greek Studies in Honor of Martin Ostwald, ed. by R.M. Rosen, J. Farrell, Ann Arbor 1993, 525–538.
Gifford 2001: M. Gifford, Dramatic Dialectic in Republic Book I, in Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: Vol. XX, ed. D. Sedley, Oxford 2001, 35–106.
Girard 1977: R. Girard, Violence and the Sacred, tr. P. Gregory, Baltimore 1977 (orig. 1972). DOI: https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801819636
Girard 1986: R. Girard, The Scapegoat, tr. Y. Freccero, Baltimore 1986 (orig. 1982). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book.98235
Grene 2013: D. Grene, Oedipus the King, in: Sophocles I, D. Grene, R. Lattimore, M. Griffith, G.W. Most, eds., Chicago 2013 (orig. 1947).
Grice 1986: P. Grice, Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge (MS) 1986.
Haigh 1896: A.E. Haigh, The Tragic Drama of the Greeks, Oxford 1896.
Hug 1872: A. Hug, Der Doppelsinn in Sophokles Oedipus König, „Philologus“ 31 (1872), 66–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1872.31.14.66
Jebb 19143: R.C. Jebb, Sophocles. Oedipus Tyrannus, Cambridge 1914 (orig. 1883).
Jouanna 2018: J. Jouanna, Sophocles: A Study of His Theater in Its Political and Social Context, tr. S. Rendall, Princeton 2018 (orig. 2008). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691240404
Kamerbeek 1967: J.C. Kamerbeek, The Plays of Sophocles: The Oedipus Tyrannus, Leiden 1967.
Kirkwood 19942: G.M. Kirkwood, A Study of Sophoclean Drama, Ithaca 1994 (orig. 1958).
Lloyd-Jones 1994: H. Lloyd-Jones, Sophocles: Ajax, Electra, Oedipus Tyrannus, Cambridge (MS) 1994.
Longo 1972: O. Longo, Sofocle: Edipo Re, Firenze 1972.
Manuwald 2012: B. Manuwald, Sophokles: König Ödipus, Berlin 2012.
March 2020: J. March, Sophocles: Oedipus Tyrannus, Liverpool 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789622546.001.0001
Moorhouse 1982: A.C. Moorhouse, The Syntax of Sophocles, Leiden 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004327962
Pokorny 1884: J. Pokorny, Die Amphibolie bei Aeschylos und Sophokles, in: Programm des K.K. Real- und Ober-Gymnasiums, Ungarisch Hradisch 1884, 3–37.
Pucci 1990: P. Pucci, The Tragic Pharmakos of the Oedipus Rex, “Helios” 17 (1990), 41–50.
Stanford 1939: W. Stanford, Ambiguity in Greek Literature: Studies in Theory and Practice, Oxford 1939.
Taplin 2015: O. Taplin, Sophocles: Four Tragedies, Oxford 2015.
Thirlwall 1833: C. Thirlwall, On the Irony of Sophocles, “The Philological Museum” 2 (1833), 483–537.
Trautner 1907: L. Trautner, Die Amphibolien bei den drei griechischen Tragikern, Nürnberg 1907.
Vernant – Vidal-Naquet 1988: J.-P. Vernant, P. Vidal-Naquet, Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece, tr. J. Lloyd, New York 1988 (orig. 1972, 1986).
Wesołowska 2021: E. Wesołowska, The Symbolic Topography of Oedipus’ Life. Some Remarks, “Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae” 31 (2021), 341–346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2021.XXXI.1.24
