Abstract
Meta-glottodidactic discourse is the area of academic discourse which enables one to develop and explicitly present general glottodidactic conceptions. This, however, is not a characteristic of didactic discourse concerned with foreign language teaching/learning and its optimization. It can be claimed that in their meta-glottodidactics discourse Polish language teaching specialists show their epistemological identity as scholars, which stems from their intellectual autonomy on the one hand and their glottodidactic community affiliation on the other. The present article talks about the discourse manifestations of Polish glottodidactics specialists’ intellectual autonomy, which are related to their epistemological choices and ways of justifying them. Given the lack of consensus about the basic epistemological issues within the glottodidactic community, scholars’ intellectual choices as well as their justifications can be varied and highly distinctive. In a qualitative comparative analysis of meta-glottodidactic discourse of two Polish glottodidactics specialists, the author of the article identifies the factors contributing to the diversity of Polish meta-glottodidactic discourse. She also attempts to explain why this particular type of discourse could encourage dialog within the Polish glottodidactic community, which might become a driving force behind the development of contemporary glottodidactics.References
Berthelet, M. (2011). La linguistique appliquée à l’enseignement des langues secondes aux États-Unis, en France et en Grande-Bretagne. Histoire, Épistémologie, Langage, 33/1, 83-97.
Chiss, J.-L. (2010). La didactique des langues : une théorie d’ensemble et des variables ? In D. Macaire, J.-P. Narcy-Combes, H. Portine (réd.), Interrogations épistémologiques en didactique des langues (pp. 37-45). Paris : Clé International.
Corder, S. P. (1967). On the significance of learners’ errors, IRAL, 5, 161-170.
Coste, D. (1986). Constitution et évolution des discours de la didactique du français langue étrangère, Études de linguistique appliquée, 61, 52-63.
Dabène, M. (1972). Le CRÉDIF en 1972. Le Français dans le Monde, 92, 8-13.
Dakowska, M. (1987). „Czym jest a czym nie jest teoria glottodydaktyczna”. Przegląd glottodydaktyczny, 8, 7-17.
Dakowska, M. (1994). Glottodydaktyka jako nauka. In B. Z. Kielar, L. Bartosiewicz (réd.), Polska szkoła lingwistyki stosowanej (pp. 65-79). Warszawa : Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Dakowska, M. (2003). Current controversies in foreign language didactics. Warszawa : Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Dakowska, M. (2014). O rozwoju dydaktyki języków obcych jako dyscypliny naukowej. Warszawa : Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Davies, A. (1990). Obituary : Pit Corder. BAAL News Letter, 36, 33-35.
Galisson, R. (1986). Éloge de la Didactologie/Didactique des Langues et des Cultures (maternelles et étrangères) – D/DLC, Études de linguistique appliquée, 64, 97-110.
Galisson, R. (1989). Problématique de l’autonomie en didactique des langues, Langue française, 82, 95-115.
Germain, C. (2000). Didactique du français et épistémologie : de la nécessité d’expliciter ses présupposés. In M. Marquilló-Larruy (réd.), Questions d’épistémologie en didactique du français (langue maternelle, langue seconde, langue étrangère) (pp. 295-300). Poitier : Les Cahiers FORELL.
Germain, C. (2001). La didactique des langues : une autonomie en devenir. Le Français dans le Monde – Recherches et applications. Théories linguistiques et enseignement du français aux non francophones, 13-23.
Girard, D. (1972). Linguistique appliquée et didactique des langues. Paris : Armand Colin – Longman.
Grucza, F. (1978). Glottodydaktyka, jej zakres i problemy, Przegląd Glottodydaktyczny, 1, 29-44.
Grucza, F. (1983). Zagadnienia metalingwistyki. Lingwistyka – jej przedmiot, lingwistyka stosowana. Warszawa : PWN.
Halté, J.-F. (1992). La didactique du français. Paris : PUF.
Karpińska-Musiał, B., Orchowska, I. (2014). Świadomość przedmiotowa i epistemologiczna nauczyciela – refleksyjnego praktyka z perspektywy polskiej glottodydaktyki. Neofilolog, 43/1, 25-38.
Komorowska, H. (1982). Metody badań empirycznych w glottodydaktyce. Warszawa : PWN.
Komorowska, H. (1999). Metodyka nauczania języków obcych. Warszawa : WSiP. Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
Maingueneau, D. (2004). Le discours littéraire. Paratopie et scène d’énonciation. Paris : Armand Colin.
Maingueneau, D., Cossutta, F. (1995). L’analyse des discours constituants. Langages, 117, 112-125. URL http://www.persee.fr/doc/lgge_0458-726x_1995_num_29_117_1709
Martinez, P. (1996). La didactique des langues étrangères. Paris : PUF.
Morin, É. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris : Seuil.
Niżegorodcew, A. (2009). Dwie tradycje badawcze w językoznawstwie stosowanym dotyczącym języka drugiego. Neofilolog, 34, 7-16.
Orchowska, I. (2013). De la communication spécialisée à l’intérieur de la communauté glottodidactique polonaise. Conceptualisation de l’objet de la discipline scientifique et de son interdisciplinarité. In E. Wąsikiewicz-Firlej, H. Lankiewicz (réd.), From classroom to workplace: advances in applied linguistics (pp. 189-206). Piła : Wydawnictwie PWSZ im. S. Staszica w Pile.
Orchowska, I. (2014). De l’autonomie scientifique de la didactologie des langues étrangères en Pologne. L’analyse comparative des conceptions de trois épistémologues contemporains polonais de la discipline. In J. I. Aguilar Río, C. Brudermann, M. Leclère (réd.), Complexité, diversité et spécificité : Pratiques didactiques en contexte (pp. 181-195). Paris : Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3.
Orchowska, I. (2015a). O transferencji wiedzy naukowej i subiektywnych poglądów na temat kształcenia nauczycieli języków obcych na podstawie rezultatów metaanalizy artykułów opublikowanych na łamach czasopisma naukowego Neofilolog. Lingwistyka Stosowana, 12, 81-96.
Orchowska, I. (2015b). O usytuowaniu epistemologicznym polskiego dyskursu glottodydaktycznego na temat kształcenia nauczycieli języków obcych. Lingwistyka Stosowana, 14/3, 95-111.
Pfeiffer, W. (1977). Toward a theory of glottodidactics: some methodological remarks. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, XXIV, 2-3/1977, 361-369.
Puren, C. (2004). Quels modèles didactiques pour la conception de dispositifs d’enseignement/apprentissage en environnement numérique ?. Études de Linguistique appliquée, 134, 235-249.
Puren, C. (2014). Épistémologie de la didactique des langues. Quelques questions en suspens. In C. Troncy (réd.), Didactique du plurilinguisme. Approches plurielles des langues et des cultures.
Autour de Michel Candelier (pp. 423-434). Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes. Raby, F., Narcy-Combes, J.-P. (2009). Prolégomènes : où en est la recherche sur la motivation en LVE et en L2 ? Lidil, 4, 5-16.
Wilczyńska, W. (2010). Obszary badawcze glottodydaktyki, Neofilolog, 34, 21-35.
Wilczyńska, W. (2015). Autonomia intelektualna neofilologa. O relacjach między teorią a praktyką i roli dialogu w zawodach językowych. Lingwistyka Stosowana, 15, 11-130.
Zabrocki, L. (1966). Językoznawcze podstawy metodyki języków obcych. Warszawa : PWN.
Zając, J. (2008). L’orientation anthropologique de la didactique des langues et ses implications interdisciplinaires. In K. Bogacki, B. Głowacka, D. Potocka (réd.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives in Foreign Language Teacher Education (pp. 147-160). Białystok : Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstosku.
Zając, J. (2011). L’interculturalité en classe de langue. In M. Sowa (réd.), L’interculturel en pratique (pp. 24-32). Lublin : Werset.
Zając, J. (2016). Kompetentny uczeń na lekcji języka obcego. Wyzwania dla glottodydaktyki mediacyjnej. Lublin : Werset.
BIBLIOGRAPHIE DU CORPUS
Dakowska, M. (2010). W poszukiwaniu wiedzy praktycznie użytecznej. O dojrzewaniu glottodydaktyki jako dziedziny akademickiej [fr. À la recherche du savoir pratiquement utile. De la maturation de la glottodidactique en tant que discipline académique], Neofilolog, 34, 9-19.
Zając, J. (2010). Glottodydaktyka w ujęciu epistemologicznym [fr. La glottodidactique dans la perspective de l’épistémologie générale], Neofilolog, 34, 37-48.
License
- The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person.The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
- The Author grants the Purchaser non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons. - The Author grants the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan permission to:
3.1. reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
3.2. send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases. - The Author declares that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled and obliged to allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the attributed license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons. Thereby, the Author entitles all interested parties to use the work, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
4.1. acknowledgment of authorship, i.e. observing the obligation to provide, along with the distributed work, information about the author, title, source (link to the original Work, DOI) and of the license itself.
4.2. the derivatives of the Work are subject to the same conditions, i.e. they may be published only based on a licence which would be identical to the one granting access to the original Work. - The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań is obliged to
5.1. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.2. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
Other provisions
- The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań hereby preserves the copyright to the journal as a whole (layout/stylesheet, graphics, cover design, logo etc.)