Abstract
Parliamentary debate (PD) as a specific genre of parliamentary discourse exhibits a hybrid nature: part oral and part written discourse. It is performed orally, but planned ahead and formal. From the point of view of lexical cohesion, encapsulation by means of abstract and unspecific nouns (e.g. fact or reason) is an indicator of the informative density and the underlying written nature of PD. With the tools provided by Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Linguistics, this paper aims at describing and characterizing cross-linguistically lexical encapsulation’s potential to define the information structure of PD. In this regard, encapsulation is analyzed in relation to the notions of topic and focus in three PDs in Catalan, Spanish and English. In order to determine the contribution of encapsulation to the information structure of PD, we describe the properties of lexical encapsulation as a referential cohesion device and analyze the various lexico-grammatical and discourse patterns in which encapsulators occur. From a cross-linguistic point of view, the results show a higher frequency of encapsulation in the debate in English. In this respect, the Scottish debate exhibits a higher cohesive and informational density than the Catalan and the Spanish ones. However, there has also been observed a homogeneous crosslinguistic behavior of encapsulation with regard to weaving the information structure of PD. In fact, the different usage patterns uncover similar general trends in the three languages. These quantitative coincidences are interpreted as genre related features. On the other hand, some patterns unveil cross-linguistic differences linked to a more speaker-dependent style aiming at guiding the addressee (persuasive function) and to the lexico-grammatical features of each language.References
Belloro, V. (2012). La estructura informativa. Dins R. Mairal, L. Guerrero & C. González Vergara (Coords.), El funcionalismo en la teoría lingüística: la Gramàtica del Papel y la Referencia (pp. 225-244). Madrid: Akal.
Bolinger, D. (1952). Linear modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 67, 1117-1144.
Bolinger, D.(1954). Meaningful word order in Spanish. Boletín de Filología (Universidad de Chile), VIII, 45-56.
Borreguero Zuloaga, M. (2006). Naturaleza y función de los encapsuladores en los textos informativamente densos (la noticia periodística). Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 13, 73-95.
Cuenca, M. J. (2000). Estudi estilístic i contrastiu de l’arquitectura de l’oració. Estil segmentat vs. estil cohesionat. Caplletra, 29, 105-120.
Cuenca, M. J.(2014). The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate. Discourse Studies, 16 (6), 729-752. DOI: 10.1177/1461445614546258.
Dijk T. A. van (2000). Parliamentary Discourse. Dins R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States (pp. 45-78). Klagenfurt: Drava.
Firbas, J. (1966a). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, 267-280.
Firbas, J. (1966b). Non-thematic subjects in contemporary English. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 2, 239-256.
Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. Dins T. Givón (Ed.), Topic Continuity in Discourse (pp. 1-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnolds.
Halliday, M. A. K & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London & New York: Longman.
Ilie, C. (2006). Parliamentary Discourses. Dins K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd Edition. Vol. 9 (pp. 188-197). Oxford: Elsevier.
Institut d’Estudis Catalans (2007). Diccionari de la llengua catalana. Segona edició (DIEC2). Obtingut de http://dlc.iec.cat/.
Jansen, H. (2003). Densità informativa. Tre parametri linguistico-testuali. Uno studio contrastivo inter- ed intralinguistico. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
López Samaniego, A. (2011). La categorización de entidades del discurso en la escritura profesional. Las etiquetas discursivas como mecanismo de cohesión léxica (tesi doctoral). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona. Obtingut de http://hdl.handle.net/10803/48757.
López Samaniego, A. (2013). Las etiquetas discursivas: del mantenimiento a la construcción del referente. Estudios de Lingüística, 27, 167-197.
López Samaniego, A. (2014). Las etiquetas discursivas: cohesión anafórica y categorización de entidades del discurso. Pamplona: EUNSA.
Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. Dins P. Cole (Ed.), Radical Pragmatics (pp. 223-255). New York: Academic Press.
Ribera, J. (2008). La cohesió lèxica en seqüències narratives (tesi doctoral). València: Universitat de València. Obtingut de http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0917109-143808/index.html
Ribera, J. (2012). La cohesió lèxica en seqüències narratives. Alacant & Barcelona: IIFV & PAM.
Ribera, J. & Marín, M. J. (en premsa). Objectivizing and subjectivizing encapsulation as evaluative strategies in parliamentary debate. Dins M. Díez Prados & A. García Gómez (Eds.), Exploring evaluative and persuasive strategies in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Salvador, V. (2000). L’estil nominalitzat. Caplletra, 29, 69-82.
Schmid, H.-J. (2000). English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells. From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Serafini, T. (1992). Come si scrive. Milano: Fabbri-Bompiani.
Vallduví, E. (2002). L’oració com a unitat informativa. Dins J. Solà, M. R. Lloret, J. Mascaró & M. Pérez-Saldanya (Dirs.), Gramàtica del català contemporani (pp. 1221-1279). Barcelona: Empúries.
License
- The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person.The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
- The Author grants the Purchaser non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons. - The Author grants the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan permission to:
3.1. reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
3.2. send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases. - The Author declares that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Purchaser is entitled and obliged to allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the attributed license pattern Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons. Thereby, the Author entitles all interested parties to use the work, for non-commercial purposes only, under the following conditions:
4.1. acknowledgment of authorship, i.e. observing the obligation to provide, along with the distributed work, information about the author, title, source (link to the original Work, DOI) and of the license itself.
4.2. the derivatives of the Work are subject to the same conditions, i.e. they may be published only based on a licence which would be identical to the one granting access to the original Work. - The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań is obliged to
5.1. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.2. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
Other provisions
- The University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań hereby preserves the copyright to the journal as a whole (layout/stylesheet, graphics, cover design, logo etc.)