Keywords
poetry writing
grammar
teaching writing
second language writing
How to Cite
Number of views: 738
Number of downloads: 549
Abstract
This paper looks at how L2 students’ writing experiences relate to the way they think they can write poems and to further investigate if any types of writing experiences contribute to their perceived poetry writing ability. The paper starts by bringing up the value of introducing poetry writing to L2 students. Then, the literature review section highlights the characteristics of L2 poetry and the values of writing poetry in L2 writing classrooms. For the methodology, semi-structured interviews were used to elicit the participants’ understanding of their writing experiences. Additionally, a rating scale was used for the participants to identify their perceived capability of writing poetry. All 18 participants who were from regions that included countries from Eastern Asia, Middle East, or Africa, were L2 students from an M.A. TESOL program located in the USA. Through a hierarchical cluster analysis, the findings categorized these students as having five different types of writing experiences. Through a Pearson correlation test, the researcher also examined if any of the specific writing experiences were found to correspond either positively or negatively with the perceived poetry writing ability. The data suggest that if students recall more grammar and structured writing experiences, they are more inclined to perceive that they have a lower perceived poetry writing ability. Finally, the study seeks to contribute to educators’ understanding about the potential of poetry writing instruction in L2 writing classrooms. It can trigger the exploration for L2 students to find their own personal purposes of writing as multilingual writers.References
Bomer, R. (1995). Time for meaning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Bilton, L., & Sivasubramaniam, S. (2009). An inquiry into expressive writing: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 13(3), 301-320.
Cahnmann-Taylor, M., Zhang, K., Bleyle, S., & Hwang, Y. (2015). “Searching for an entrance” and finding a two-way door: Using poetry to create east-west contact zones in TESOL teacher education. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(21), 1-29.
Cahnmann-Taylor, M., Bleyle, S., Hwang, Y., & Zhang, K. (2017). Teaching poetry in TESOL teacher education: Heightened attention to language as well as to cultural and political critique through poetry writing. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 70-101.
Chamcharatsri, P. (2009). Second language writers and creative writing. TESOL, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/sec_issue.asp?nid=4116&iid=12800&sid=1
Chamcharatsri, P. B. (2013). Poetry writing to express love in Thailand in English: A second language (L2) writing perspective. International Journal of Innovation in English Language, 2(2), 141-157.
Dai, F. (2010). English-language creative writing in mainland China. World Englishes, 29, 546-556.
Fernsten, L. (2008). Writer identity and ESL learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 44-52.
Garvin, R. T. (2013). Researching Chinese history and culture through poetry writing in an EFL composition class. L2 Journal, 5(1), 76-94.
Hanauer, D. (2004). Poetry and the meaning of life. Toronto: Pippin.
Hanauer, D. (2010). Poetry as research. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hanauer, D. (2011a). The scientific study of poetic writing. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 79-87.
Hanauer, D. I. (2011b). Meaningful literacy: Writing poetry in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 45(1), 105-115.
Hanauer, D. I. (2014). Appreciating the beauty of second language poetry writing. In D. Disney (Ed.), Exploring second language creative writing: Beyond babel (pp. 11-22). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Hanauer, D. I. (2015). Measuring voice in poetry written by second language learners. Written Communication, 32(1), 66-86. doi: 10.1177/0741088314563023
Iida, A. (2008). Poetry writing as expressive pedagogy in an EFL context: Identifying possible assessment tools for haiku poetry in EFL freshman college writing. Assessing Writing, 13, 171-179.
Iida, A. (2010). Developing voice by composing haiku: A social-expressivist framework for teaching haiku writing in EFL contexts. English Teaching Forum, 48(1), 28-34.
Iida, A. (2012a). The value of poetry writing: Cross-genre literacy development in a second language. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 60-82.
Iida, A. (2012b). Writing haiku in a second language: Perceptions, attitudes, and emotions of second language learners. Sino-US English Teaching, 9(9), 1472-1485.
Kramsch, C. (2003). The privilege of the nonnative speaker. In C. Blythe (Eds.), The sociolinguistics of foreign language classrooms: Contributions of the native, the near-native and the non-native speaker (pp. 252-261). Boston: Heinle.
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322.
Liao, F. (2016). Identities in an ESL poetry book: A case study of one Chinese student. The Journal of Literature in Language Teaching, 5(1), 45-61.
Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 35-53.
McKay, S. (2009). Teaching English as an international language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ostrow, J., & Chang, L. C. N. (2012). I’m a poet? International doctoral students at a U.S. university participate in a creative writing workshop. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 48-64.
Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing other’s words: Text, ownership, memory, and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 201-230.
Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 407-430.
Schultz, J. M. (2001). Toward a pedagogy of creative writing in a foreign language. In G. Brauer (Ed.), Pedagogy of language learning in higher education: An introduction (pp. 93-108). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Tin, T. (2010). Language creativity and co-emergence of form and meaning in creative writing tasks. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 1-22.
Yim, O., & Ramdeen, K. T. (2015). Hierarchical cluster analysis: Comparison of three linkage measures and application to psychological data. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 22(1), 8-21.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.