Main Article Content
The case study aims to provide insights into how a Hungarian EFL teacher used tests, assessed her young learners and gave feedback to them in the classroom. This qualitative, exploratory study was a follow-up to a large-scale project. In this single-case study, data were collected from an EFL teacher and five of her seventh graders on what tasks she used to assess them and how. The participants were interviewed. For the purpose of triangulation, the students were also audio- and video-recorded while doing four speaking tasks, and two classes were observed. The results revealed that for the teacher with decades of teaching experience there was room for improvement in her knowledge of age-appropriate teaching methodology and that some of her beliefs and practices reflected a lack of understanding how children develop. She had difficulty diagnosing her students’ strengths and weaknesses. The learners were rarely provided with feedback on their performance and language development; therefore, they did not see how much they had progressed. Low achievers had a hard time catching up with their peers; and they lagged further behind. The teacher seemed to be more interested in what her students did not know rather than focusing on what they could do.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.
- Alderson, J. C. (2005). Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.
- Bors, L., Lugossy, R., & Nikolov, M. (2001). Az angol nyelv oktatásának átfogó értékelése pécsi általános iskolákban [A comprehensive evaluation study of the teaching of English in Pécs primary schools]. Iskolakultúra, 11(4), 73-88.
- Brumen, M., Cagran, B., & Rixon, S. (2009). Comparative assessment of young learners’ foreign language competence in three Eastern European countries. Educational Studies, 35(3), 269-295. Retrieved from http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2275/1/WRAP_Rixon_Brumen_Assessment_ok.pdf
- Butler, Y. G. (2009a). How do teachers observe and evaluate elementary school students’ foreign language performance? A case study from South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 417-444.
- Butler, Y. G. (2009b). Issues in the assessment and evaluation of English language education at the elementary school level: Implications for policies in South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(2), 1-31.
- Butler, Y. G. (2015). Task-based assessment for young learners: The role of teachers in changing cultures. In M. Thomas & H. Reinders (Eds.), Contemporary task-based language teaching in Asia (pp. 348-365). London: Bloomsbury.
- Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004-2006. Retrieved from http://www.eu.int/comm/education/doc/official/keydoc/actlang/act_lang_en.pdf
- Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
- de Bot, K. (2014). The effectiveness of early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4, 409-418.
- Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Edelenbos, P., Johnstone, R., & Kubanek, A. (2006). The main pedagogical principles underlying the teaching of languages to very young learners: Languages for the children in Europe: Published research, good practice and main principles. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/lang/doc/youngsum_en.pdf
- Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek, A. (2009). Early foreign language learning: Published research, good practice and main principles. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), The age factor and early language learning (pp. 39-58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: The concept of diagnostic competence. Language Testing, 21(3), 259-283.
- Garton, S., Copland, F., & Burns, A. (2011). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. London: British Council. Retrieved from http://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/ec/files/B094FINALAstonUniversityA4report_2column_V3.pdf
- Hild, G. (2014a). Assessing young language learners’ development: Hungarian teachers’ views on assessment tasks and practices. In J. Horváth & P. Medgyes (Eds.), Studies in honour of Marianne Nikolov (pp. 72-86). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.
- Hild, G. (2014b). Assessment of young EFL learners in the Hungarian educational context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pécs, Hungary.
- Hild, G., & Nikolov, M. (2011). Teachers’ views on tasks that work with primary school EFL learners. In M. Lehmann, R. Lugossy, & J. Horváth (Eds.), UPRT 2010: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 47-62). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.
- Hutchinson, T. (2003). Project English 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ioannou-Georgio, S., & Pavlou, P. (2003). Assessing young learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Johnstone, R. (2009) An early start: What are the key conditions for generalized success? In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 23-30). Reading: Garnet.
- Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2006). Dynamic assessment in the foreign language classroom: A teacher’s guide. Pennsylvania: CALPER University Park. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/57598521/DA-Guide
- Lugossy, R. (2009). “I will think about this”: A case study with a lower-primary school teacher of English. In R. Lugossy, J. Horváth, & M. Nikolov (Eds.), UPRT 2008: Empirical studies in English applied linguistics (pp. 59-69). Pécs: Lingua Franca Csoport.
- Lundberg, G. (2007). Developing teachers of young learners: In-service for educational change and improvement. In M. Nikolov, J. M. Djigunović, M. Mattheoudakis, G. Lundberg, & T. Flanagan (Eds.), Teaching modern languages to young learners: Teachers, curricula and materials (pp. 21-34). Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages, Council of Europe Publishing.
- Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- McKay, P. (2006). Assessing young language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Medgyes, P., & Nikolov, M. (2014). Research in foreign language education in Hungary (2006-2012). Language Teaching, 47, 504-537
- Nikolov, M. (1995). Általános iskolás gyerekek motivációja az angol mint idegen nyelv tanulására [Primary school students’ motivation to learn English as a foreign language]. Modern Nyelvoktatás, 1(1), 7-20.
- Nikolov, M. (1999a). Classroom observation project. In H. Fekete, É. Major, & M. Nikolov (Eds.), English language education in Hungary: A baseline study (pp. 221-246). Budapest: British Council.
- Nikolov, M. (1999b). “Why do you learn English?” “Because the teacher is short”: A study of Hungarian children’s foreign language learning motivation. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 33-65.
- Nikolov, M. (2001). A study of unsuccessful language learners. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 149-170). Honolulu, HI: The University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
- Nikolov, M. (2003). Angolul és németül tanuló diákok nyelvtanulási attitűdje és motivációja [Attitudes and motivation of English and German learners]. Iskolakultúra, 13(8), 61-73.
- Nikolov, M. (2008). “Az általános iskola, az módszertan!” Alsó tagozatos angolórák empirikus vizsgálata [“Primary school means methodology!” An empirical study of lower-primary EFL classes]. Modern Nyelvoktatás, 10(1-2), 3-19.
- Nikolov, M. (Ed.). (2009a). Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Nikolov, M. (Ed.). (2009b). The age factor and early language learning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Nikolov, M. (2009c). The dream and the reality of early programmes in Hungary. In J. Enever, J. Moon, & U. Raman (Eds.), Young learner English policy and implementation: International perspectives (pp. 121-129). Reading: Garnet Education.
- Nikolov, M. (2011). Az angol nyelvtudás fejlesztésének és értékelésének keretei az általános iskola első hat évfolyamán [A framework for developing and assessing proficiency in English as a foreign language in the first six years of primary school]. Modern Nyelvoktatás, 17(1), 9-31.
- Nikolov, M. (2016a). Trends, issues, and challenges in assessing young language learners. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 1-18). New York: Springer.
- Nikolov, M. (2016b). A framework for young EFL learners’ diagnostic assessment: 'Can do statements’ and task types. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 65-92). New York: Springer.
- Nikolov, M., & Mihaljevic-Djigunovic, J. (2006). Recent research on age, second language acquisition, and early foreign language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 234-260.
- Nikolov, M., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2011). All shades of every color: An overview of early teaching and learning of foreign languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 95-119.
- Nikolov, M., & Szabó, G. (2012). Developing diagnostic tests for young learners of EFL in grades 1 to 6. In E. D. Galaczi & C. J. Weir (Eds.), Exploring language frameworks (pp. 345-361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Peng, J., & Zheng, S. C. (2016). A longitudinal study of a school’s assessment project in Chongqing, China. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 213-242). New York: Springer.
- Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer.
- Rea-Dickins, P. (2004). Understanding teachers as agents of assessment. Language Testing, 21, 249-258.
- Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17, 215-243.
- Shohamy, E. (1992). Beyond proficiency testing: A diagnostic feedback testing model for assessing foreign language learning. Modern Language Journal, 76, 513-521.
- Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wilden, E., & Porsch, R. (2016). Learning EFL from year 1 or year 3? A Comparative study on children's EFL listening and reading comprehension at the end of primary education. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspectives (pp. 191-212). New York: Springer.