Arabic language-learning strategy preferences among undergraduate students

Main Article Content

Hezi Y. Brosh

Abstract

This study elicited Arabic students’ perceptions regarding their language-learning strategy preferences (LLSPs). A sample of 120 undergraduate Arabic students participated. Data were collected through a questionnaire and interviews. The findings reveal that students tend to adopt a holistic view of the learning task and relate it to real-life, personal experience. Participants selected interaction with the teacher, speaking, and flashcards as their most preferred application-directed learning strategies. These selections demonstrate that Arabic students desire to be proactive in order to make the language more concrete for them, to enhance their performance, and to develop language skills that will last a lifetime. Whereas advanced level participants preferred interaction with the teacher, speaking, flashcards, and working individually, beginner level participants preferred learning grammar and group work. The empirical evidence from this study could have implications regarding theoretical models of effective Arabic language instruction, Arabic teacher education programs, and curriculum development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Brosh, H. Y. (2019). Arabic language-learning strategy preferences among undergraduate students. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 351-377. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.2.5
Section
Articles
Author Biography

Hezi Y. Brosh, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis

Hezi Y. Brosh, PhD (Associate Professor, United States Naval Academy), is the first scholar to explore the influence of cognitive and affective variables on the learning of Arabic as a foreign language by Hebrew speakers. As an applied linguist, he focuses on the teaching and learning of Arabic as a foreign language and has expertise in sociolinguistics, curriculum planning and design and development of teaching materials. He is the author of numerous conference papers, articles, and textbooks.

Contact details: United States Naval Academy, Department of Languages and Cultures, 589 McNair Road, Annapolis, Maryland 21402-5030, USA, tel: 410-293-5354 (brosh@usna.edu)

References

  1. Amara, M. (1995). Arabic diglossia in the classroom: Assumptions and reality. In S. Izre‘el & R. Drory (Eds.), Israel oriental studies XV: Language and culture in the Near East (pp. 131-142). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
  2. Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic sociolinguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
  3. Bateson, M. C. (2003). Arabic language handbook. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  4. Bialystok, E. (1985). The compatibility of teaching and learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 255-262.
  5. Brosh, H. (2013). Motivation of American college students to study Arabic. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(19), 27-38.
  6. Brosh, H. (2017). Grammar in the Arabic language classroom: Perceptions and preferences. Al’Arabiyya, 50, 25-52.
  7. Brosh, H., & Lubna, A. (2009). Ramifications of diglossia on how native Arabic-speaking students in Israel write. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 165-190.
  8. Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 71-83). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  9. Cohen, A. D. (1984). Studying second-language learning strategies: How do we get the information? Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 101-112.
  10. Cohen, A. D. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies: Clarifying the issues. CARLA Working Paper Series #3. The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
  11. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
  12. Cohen, A. D. (2011). L2 learner strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Methods and instruction in second language teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 681-698). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  13. Cohen, A. D. (2012). Strategies: The interface of styles, strategies, and motivation on tasks. In S. Ryan & M. Williams (Eds.), Language learning psychology: Research, theory and pedagogy (pp. 136-150). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  16. Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313-330.
  17. Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult Language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311-327.
  18. Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. E. (2005). Applications, reliability, and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/ f/felder/public/Learning_Styles.html
  19. Grenfell, M. J., & Harris, V. (2017). Language learner strategies. London: Bloomsbury Academics.
  20. Hagino, H. (2002). Task effects on the development of EFL listening proficiency. Tokyo: Eshiosya.
  21. Kamińska, P. M. (2014). Learning styles and second language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  22. Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24-40). New York: Routledge.
  23. Mitchell, T. F. (1986). What is educated spoken Arabic? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 61(1), 7-32.
  24. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  25. O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557-584.
  26. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  27. Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 271-278.
  28. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.
  29. Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  30. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M. Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
  31. Ryding, K. C. (1991). Proficiency despite diglossia: A new approach for Arabic. Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 212-218.
  32. Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  33. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431-449.
  34. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407.
  35. Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive, and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 25-50.
  36. Weaver, S. F., & Cohen, A. D. (1994). Making learning strategy instruction a reality in the foreign language classroom. In C. Klee (Ed.), Faces in a arowd: The individual learner in multisection courses (pp. 285-323). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.