Keywords
language-learning strategy preferences
language-teaching strategy preferences
Arabic learning as a foreign language
effective Arabic language learning and teaching
undergraduate students
How to Cite
Number of views: 1138
Number of downloads: 791
Abstract
This study elicited Arabic students’ perceptions regarding their language-learning strategy preferences (LLSPs). A sample of 120 undergraduate Arabic students participated. Data were collected through a questionnaire and interviews. The findings reveal that students tend to adopt a holistic view of the learning task and relate it to real-life, personal experience. Participants selected interaction with the teacher, speaking, and flashcards as their most preferred application-directed learning strategies. These selections demonstrate that Arabic students desire to be proactive in order to make the language more concrete for them, to enhance their performance, and to develop language skills that will last a lifetime. Whereas advanced level participants preferred interaction with the teacher, speaking, flashcards, and working individually, beginner level participants preferred learning grammar and group work. The empirical evidence from this study could have implications regarding theoretical models of effective Arabic language instruction, Arabic teacher education programs, and curriculum development.
References
Amara, M. (1995). Arabic diglossia in the classroom: Assumptions and reality. In S. Izre‘el & R. Drory (Eds.), Israel oriental studies XV: Language and culture in the Near East (pp. 131-142). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.
Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic sociolinguistics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
Bateson, M. C. (2003). Arabic language handbook. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bialystok, E. (1985). The compatibility of teaching and learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 255-262.
Brosh, H. (2013). Motivation of American college students to study Arabic. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(19), 27-38.
Brosh, H. (2017). Grammar in the Arabic language classroom: Perceptions and preferences. Al’Arabiyya, 50, 25-52.
Brosh, H., & Lubna, A. (2009). Ramifications of diglossia on how native Arabic-speaking students in Israel write. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 165-190.
Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 71-83). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cohen, A. D. (1984). Studying second-language learning strategies: How do we get the information? Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 101-112.
Cohen, A. D. (1996). Second language learning and use strategies: Clarifying the issues. CARLA Working Paper Series #3. The University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Cohen, A. D. (2011). L2 learner strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning: Methods and instruction in second language teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 681-698). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Cohen, A. D. (2012). Strategies: The interface of styles, strategies, and motivation on tasks. In S. Ryan & M. Williams (Eds.), Language learning psychology: Research, theory and pedagogy (pp. 136-150). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313-330.
Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1990). Adult Language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 311-327.
Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. E. (2005). Applications, reliability, and validity of the index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 103-112. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/ f/felder/public/Learning_Styles.html
Grenfell, M. J., & Harris, V. (2017). Language learner strategies. London: Bloomsbury Academics.
Hagino, H. (2002). Task effects on the development of EFL listening proficiency. Tokyo: Eshiosya.
Kamińska, P. M. (2014). Learning styles and second language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Loewen, S. (2012). The role of feedback. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 24-40). New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, T. F. (1986). What is educated spoken Arabic? International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 61(1), 7-32.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 557-584.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: Concepts and relationships. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 271-278.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Longman/Pearson Education.
Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M. Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119.
Ryding, K. C. (1991). Proficiency despite diglossia: A new approach for Arabic. Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 212-218.
Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431-449.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407.
Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive, and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31(1), 25-50.
Weaver, S. F., & Cohen, A. D. (1994). Making learning strategy instruction a reality in the foreign language classroom. In C. Klee (Ed.), Faces in a arowd: The individual learner in multisection courses (pp. 285-323). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.