Keywords
language learning strategies
self-regulation
autonomy
adult education
English language program
How to Cite
Number of views: 1374
Number of downloads: 946
Abstract
English language tutoring and/or self-access centers are services commonly offered as curricular support to English language program students in educational environments worldwide. This paper argues that the theory of self-directed learning (SDL) from the field of adult education should be considered alongside the equally-important areas of language learning strategies, learner autonomy, and self-regulated learning in the setup of these types of tutoring/self-access academic support centers. The proposition is examined by applying it to a particular case in an English language program of a major research university in the southeastern United States. The paper explicates the commonly-known theory of SDL (Grow, 1991) and relates it to models by put forward by Nakata (2010) and Oxford (2011, 2107). Empirical evidence from studies on encouraging SDL for English language study is summarized from a range of research projects conducted worldwide, and the author concludes by offering implications for educators in any institution-based, adult English language program.
References
Bambacas, M., & Sanderson, G. B. (2011). Instructional preferences of students in transnational Chinese and English language MBA programs. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1), 1-12.
Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999). The autonomous learner model: Optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.
Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. (2002). Language strategy use survey. Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota. Also published in A. D. Cohen & S. J. Weaver (Eds.). (2006). Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teachers’ guide (pp. 68-74). Minneapolis, MN: Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gan, Z. (2004). Attitudes and strategies as predictors of self‐directed language learning in an EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 389-411.
Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in Chinese universities. Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229-244.
Grover, K. S., Miller, M. T., Swearingen, B., & Wood, N. (2014). An examination of the self-directed learning practices of ESL adult language learners. Journal of Adult Education, 43(2), 12-19.
Grow, G. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125-149. Retrieved from https://10.1177/0001848191041003001
Grow, G. (1994). Serving the strategic reader: Cognitive reading theory and its implications for the teaching of writing. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educators in Journalism and Mass Communication. Retrieved from http://longleaf.net/wp/articles-teaching/serving-strategic-reader/
Grow, G. (2006). Channels of attention: Modes of student attention that compete with classroom learning. Retrieved from http://longleaf.net/wp/articles-teaching/channels-attention-1/
Grow, G. (2010). Back to school with Gerald Grow: The principles of design and their shadow. Visual Communication Quarterly, 17(2), 108-116.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management and organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Karatas, H. H., Alci, B., Yurtseven, N., & Yuksel, H. G. (2015). Prediction of ELT students’ academic (language) achievement: Language learning orientation and autonomous learning. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 160-171.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Free Press.
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory with practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mutlu, A., & Eroz-Tuga, B. (2013). The role of computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in promoting learner autonomy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 107-122.
Nakata, Y. (2010). Toward a framework for self-regulated language-learning. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 1-10.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.
Oxford, R. L. (2016). Toward a psychology of well-being for languages learners: The “EMPATHICS” vision. In P. MacIntyre, T. Gregersen, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Positive psychology in second language acquisition (pp.10-87). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies: Self-regulation in context (2nd ed.) New York: Routledge.
Plonsky, L. (2011). Systematic review article: The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993-1038.
Raidal, S. L., & Volet, S. E. (2009). Preclinical students’ predispositions towards social forms of instruction and self-directed learning: Chhallenge for the development of autonomous and collaborative learners. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 57(5), 577-596.
Ramamuruthy, V., & Rao, S. (2015). Smartphones promote autonomous learning in ESL classrooms. Malaysian Online Journal Of Educational Technology, 3(4), 23-35.
Tough, A. (1978). Major learning efforts: Recent research and future directions. Adult Education Qarterly, 28, 250-263.
Tse, A. H. (2012). Self-access language learning for Malaysian university students. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 163-167.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenden, A. (1991). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Yarahmadzehi, N., & Bazleh, E. E. (2012). The effects of applying Betts’ autonomous learner model on Iranian students. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 3(3), 310-321.
Zastezhko, O. (2016). Beyond classroom borders: Successes and challenges of IEP tutoring. Paper presented at the International Convention for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Baltimore, MD.
Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts., P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 750-768). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1-12). New York: Routledge.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.