Keywords
ecological perspective
microsystem
exosystem
mesosystem
macrosystem
How to Cite
Number of views: 1597
Number of downloads: 1378
Abstract
Learning about language teacher cognition (LTC) is useful for understanding how language teachers act in the classroom. Employing an ecological framework, this study aimed to explore the factors influencing language teachers’ LTCs at different levels. To this end, qualitative data using semi-structured interviews and observation were collected from 62 (30 males and 32 females) Iranian EFL teachers. The results indicated that, at microsystem level, factors such as teaching equipment and facilities, teachers’ mood and feelings, their job satisfaction, and language proficiency influenced LTC. At mesosystem level, LTC was influenced by teachers’ prior learning experience, the collaboration and collegiality among teachers working in the language institute, teachers’ self-efficacy, and critical incidents that happened when teaching or learning. Additionally, the results indicated that exosystem level factors including teacher appraisal criteria, the teaching program and curriculum, and teacher immunity affected LTC. Moreover, LTC was subject to the influence of the government’s attitudes about ELT and religious beliefs about self and interaction, and friendliness with students at macrosystem level. More importantly, it was found that the factors influencing LTC were interrelated and interconnected and in several cases, LTC was a product of joint effect of several factors at various ecosystem levels. Finally, findings in this study suggest that language teaching programs provide recent educational technology in the classroom, foster collaboration and collegiality among teachers, and clarify teacher appraisal criteria for teachers in order to help create positive language teaching beliefs.
References
Berg, S., Benz, C. R., Lasley, T., & Raisch, D. (1998). Exemplary technology use in elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 111-122. http://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1998.10782245
Bernat, E. (2008). Beyond beliefs: Psycho-cognitive, sociocultural and emergent ecological approaches to learner perceptions in foreign language acquisition. Asian EFL Journal, 10(3), 7-27.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Borg, S. (2018). Evaluating the impact of professional development. RELC Journal, 49(2), 195-216. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218784371
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 3-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Burns, A., Freeman, D., & Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: Mapping research on language teacher cognition. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585-601. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12245
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1996). Analytic ordering for theoretical purposes. Qualitative Inquiry, 2 (2), 139-150. http://doi.org/10.1177/107780049600200201
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA.: SAGE.
Crooks, G. (2015). Redrawing the boundaries on theory, research, and practice concerning language teachers’ philosophies and language teacher cognition: Toward a critical perspective. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 485-499. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12237
Cummins, J., & Early, M. (2015). Big ideas for expanding minds: Teaching English language learners across the curriculum. Ontario: Pearson Canada
Cummings, A. (2008). Spanish teachers' beliefs and practices on computers in the classroom. Hispania, 1, 73-92.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrell, T. S. (2015). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Farrell, T. S. (2016). The practices of encouraging TESOL teachers to engage in reflective practice: An appraisal of recent research contributions. Language Teaching Research, 20(2), 223-247. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815617335
Farrell, T. S., & Kun, S. T. K. (2007). Language policy, language teachers' beliefs, and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 381-403. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm050
Farrell, T. S., & Lim, P. C. P. (2005). Conceptions of grammar teaching: A case study of teachers' beliefs and classroom practices. TESL-EJ 9(2), 1-13.
Feryok, A. (2010). Language teacher cognitions: Complex dynamic systems? System, 38(2), 272-279. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.02.001
Feryok, A., & Oranje, J. (2015). Adopting a cultural portfolio project in teaching German as a foreign language: Language teacher cognition as a dynamic system. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 546-564. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12243
Freeman, D. (2016). Educating second language teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ghafar Samar, R., & Moradkhani, S. (2014). Codeswitching in the language classroom: A study of four EFL teachers’ cognition. RELC Journal, 45(2), 151-164. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214534796
Hiver, P. (2017). Tracing the signature dynamics of language teacher immunity: A retrodictive qualitative modelling study. Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 669-690. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12433
Hornberger, N. (Ed.). (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. http://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596568
Johnson, K. E. (1996). The vision versus the reality: The tensions of the TESOL practicum. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 30-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Karimi, M. N., & Norouzi, M. (in press). Cognitive aging in teachers: L2 teachers’ cognitive performance across various stages in their teaching career. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1080/17 501229.2018.1466893
Kramsch, C. (2002). Language and culture: A social semiotic perspective. ADFL Bulletin, 33(2), 8-15. http://doi.org/10.1632/adfl.33.2.8
Kramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teaching, 41(3), 389-408. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005065
Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. (2007). Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. In N. Hornberger & P. Duff (Eds.) Encyclopaedia of language and education (Vol. 8, pp. 17-28). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Kubanyiova, M. (2015). The role of teachers’ future self-guides in creating L2 development opportunities in teacher-led classroom discourse: Reclaiming the relevance of language teacher cognition. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 565-584. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12244
Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435-449. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12239
Leather, J., & van Dam, J. (2003). Towards an ecology of language acquisition. In J. Leather & J. Van Dam (Eds.), Ecology of language acquisition (pp. 1-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-0 17-0341-3
Moodie, I. (2015). Grounded narrative inquiry into language teacher cognition: Stories and case studies on English language teaching in South Korea. Doctoral dissertation, University of Otago.
Moodie, I. (2016). The anti-apprenticeship of observation: How negative prior language learning experience influences English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. System, 60, 29-41. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.011
Moodie, I., & Feryok, A. (2015). Beyond cognition to commitment: English language teaching in South Korean primary schools. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 450-469. http://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12238
Muhlhausler, P. (1996). Linguistic ecology: Language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific Region. London: Routledge.
Ng, E. K. J., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2003). Do teachers’ beliefs of grammar teaching match their classroom practices? A Singapore case study. English in Singapore: Research on Grammar, 2, 128-137.
Nunan, D. (2001). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rahmani Doqaruni, V. (2017). Communication strategies in experienced vs. inexperienced teachers’ talk: A sign of transformation in teacher cognition. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 17-31. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2015.1009071
Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196-213. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00111
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
Sadeghi, K., & Richards, J. C. (2016). The idea of English in Iran: An example from Urmia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 37(4), 419-434. http://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1080714
Sharifian, F. (2010). Cultural conceptualisations in intercultural communication: A study of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3367-3376. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.006
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Doosti, M. (2016). An investigation into factors contributing to Iranian secondary school English teachers’ job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Research Papers in Education, 31 (3), 274-298. http://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1037335
Tedick, D. J. (2009). K-12 language teacher preparation: Problems and possibilities. Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 263-267. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.15404781.2009.00860_2.x
Van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers. http://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7912-5
Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, T. (2010). Second language teacher education: Review of recent research onpractice. Language Teaching, 43(3), 259-296. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000030
Yaghoubinejad, H., Zarrinabadi, N., & Nejadansari, D. (2017). Culture-specificity of teacher demotivation: Iranian junior high school teachers caught in the newly-introduced CLT trap! Teachers and Teaching, 23(2), 127-140.
Yunus, M. M., Salehi, H., & Amini, M. (2016). EFL teachers’ cognition of teaching Englishpronunciation techniques: A mixed-method approach. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 20. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p20
Zarrinabadi, N., & Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V. (2018). English in contemporary Iran. Asian Englishes, 20(1), 81-94. http://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2017.1389147
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.