Keywords
language planning
English as a foreign language
rural education
teacher education
How to Cite
Number of views: 1335
Number of downloads: 1127
Abstract
In many countries, English as a foreign/second language (L2) teaching has become compulsory in urban and rural public schools. In rural areas, the challenges for the implementation of this state-sanctioned policy have been explored among L2 teaching specialists. However, this mixed-methods study considered a different teacher group and examined the struggles and initiatives of generalist teachers who are obligated to teach English in rural schools. To this end, data were collected from 115 teachers in 17 rural secondary schools in the Southeast of Mexico. First, the participants completed a survey with closed-ended questions that elicited information about teacher education, teaching experience and knowledge of the rural school system. Then, a subsample of participants completed an individual thematized semi-structured interview. They were selected on the basis of L2 teacher education involvement. In the survey data, response patterns were identified using frequency analyses. The interview data were analyzed using categorical aggregation. The data revealed that the generalist teachers struggle with L2 professionalization, sociocultural and instructional challenges. Nonetheless, only few participants have been engaged in L2 teacher education which could help them overcome these challenges. Instead, they rely upon limited strategies to counteract the day-to-day challenges at the expense of effective L2 teaching practices.
Funding
Conacyt - INEE
the school superintendents, principals and teachers
Lisseth Cuevas
Darcy Stock
the journal editor and reviewers
References
Arias, A., & Izquierdo, J. (2015). Language attention in content-based instruction: The case of language instructors teaching content in a foreign language in Mexican higher education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(2), 194-217.
Bonilla, S., & Cruz-Arcila, F. (2014). Critical socio-cultural elements of the intercultural endeavor of English teaching in Colombian rural areas. Profile, 16(2), 117-133.
Bryan, L., & McLaughlin, H. (2005). Teaching and learning in rural Mexico: A portrait of student responsibility in everyday school life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 33-48.
Carr, W. (1999). Fear of teaching French: Challenges faced by generalist teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(1),155-179.
Coelho, F., & Henze, R. (2014). English for what? Rural Nicaraguan teachers’ local responses to national educational policy. Language Policy, 13(2), 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9309-4.
Creswell, J. (2018). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods approaches. Sage.
Crystal, D. (2012). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. North American edition. Sage
Giannikas, C. (2011). L1 in English language learning: A research study in a Greek regional context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 319-339.
Hancock, C., & Scherff, L. (2010). Who will stay and who will leave? Predicting secondary English teacher attrition risk. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(4), 328-338.
Hansen-Thomas, H., & Grosso, L. (2015). ESL mentoring for secondary rural educators: Math and science teachers become second language specialists through collaboration. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 766-776.
Hansen-Thomas, H., Grosso, L., Kakkar, K., & Okeyo, C. (2016). I do not feel I am properly trained to help them! Rural teachers’ perceptions of challenges and needs with English-language learners. Professional Development in Education, 42(2), 308-324.
Hernández, M., & Izquierdo, J. (2020). Cambios curriculares y enseñanza del inglés: Cuestionario de percepción docente. Sinéctica, Revista Electrónica de Educación, 54, 1-22.
Hossain, M. (2016). English language teaching in rural areas: A scenario and problems and prospects in context of Bangladesh. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 7(3), 1-12.
Izquierdo, J., García, V., Garza, G., & Aquino, S. (2016). First and target language use in public language education for young learners: Longitudinal evidence from Mexican secondary-school classrooms. System, 61, 20-30.
Kihlstedt, M. (2019). Foreign language teaching and learning in primary schools in Europe: Beliefs and realities. Emerging Trends in Education, 2(3), 71-96.
Kissau, S., Davin, K., & Wang, C. (2019). Aspiring world language teachers: Their influences, perceptions, and commitment to teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 174-182.
König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauss, S., & Tachtsoglou, S. (2016). Teachers’ professional knowledge for teaching English as a foreign language: Assessing the outcomes of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 320-337.
Lamb, M. (2012). A self system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62, 997-1023.
Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2020). Teaching and learning L2 in the classroom: It’s about time. Language Teaching, 53(1), 1-11.
Pinzón, R. (2014). English teaching through project-based learning method in rural area. Cuadernos de lingüística hispánica, 23, 151-170.
Ramos Holguín, B., & Aguirre Morales, J. (2016). English language teaching in rural areas: A new challenge for English language teachers in Colombia. Cuadernos de Lingüística Hispánica, 27, 209-222.
Roldán, A., & Peláez, O. (2017). English language policy in a Colombian rural area: A case study in Antioquia. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 22(1), 121-139.
Saulés, S. (2012). La competencia lectora en pisa. Influencias, innovaciones y desarrollo. INEE.
SE. (2011). Modelo educativo para el fortalecimiento de telesecundaria. Documento base. Secretaría de Educación Pública, Mexico.
SE. (2016). Manual para la Aplicación, Calificación, Análisis y Uso de los Resultados de la Prueba. Planea Educación Básica, Tercer Grado de Secundaria, 2016. Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP), Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación (INEE).
SE. (2017). Estadística del sistema educativo Tabasco. Ciclo escolar 2016-2017. Sistema Nacional de Información Estadística Educativa, Mexico.
Woodend, J., Fedoruk, L., Beek, A., Roy, S., Xu, X., Groen, J., & Li, X. (2019). The privileging of English language use in academia: Critical reflections from an international doctoral seminar. Emerging Trends in Education, 2(3), 1-22.
Yunus, M., & Abdullah, N. (2011). Motivation and attitudes for learning English among year six students in primary rural school. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2631-2636.
Zein, M. S. (2017). Elementary English education in Indonesia: Policy developments, current practices, and future prospects. English Today, 33(1), 53-59.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.