Keywords
L2 motivation
L2 self
learning context
How to Cite
Number of views: 898
Number of downloads: 703
Abstract
Drawing on theoretical insights from a complex dynamic systems framework, this work explores the ways that learner selves, as they relate to learning and using languages, manifest across different contexts and timescales and emerge in interaction with various factors. First, a broad overview of dynamically-oriented L2 motivation research is provided before critically considering the need for research that aligns with conceptual advances made under the dynamic turn in SLA. In particular, this critical overview highlights a crucial need for more research employing dynamic methods capable of revealing how learner perceptions of self emerge in relation to their interlocutors and in interaction with external factors, including language ideologies that may uniquely characterize sociocultural contexts where target languages other than English are learned. The chapter concludes by discussing ways to implement dynamically oriented methodology that can provide much needed insights into the inherent dynamic, emergent, and contextually and socially embedded nature of learner selves.
References
Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Sixty years of language motivation research: Looking back and looking forward. SAGE Open. http://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017701976
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N., . . . Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59, 1-26.
Benson, P. (2019). Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies. Language Teaching, 52, 60-70.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005-2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145-157.
Consoli, S., & Aoyama, T. (2019). Longitudinal L2 motivation inquiry: A response to Lamb’s (2016) “When motivation research motivates: issues in long-term empirical investigations.” Innovations in Language Learning and Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1548081
de Bot, K. (2008). Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. Modern Language Journal, 92, 166-178.
de Bot, K. (2015). A history of applied linguistics: From 1980 to the present. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009a). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identities and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009b). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230-248.
Dörnyei, Z. (2010). The relationship between language aptitude and language learning motivation: Individual differences from a dynamic systems perspective. In E. Macaro (Ed.), Continuum companion to second language acquisition (pp. 247-267). London, UK: Continuum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2017). Conceptualizing learner individual differences in motivational dynamics. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 79-96). John Benjamins.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Douglas Fir Group, The (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100, 19-47.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation and second language acquisition. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 1-19). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Meza, M. D. (2014). The motion of emotion: Idiodynamic case studies of learners’ foreign language anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 98, 574-588.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2017). Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 4-15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Henry, A. (2011). Examining the impact of L2 English on L3 selves: A case study. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8, 235-255.
Henry, A. (2015). The dynamics of possible selves. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 83-94). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Henry, A. (2017). L2 motivation and multilingual identities. Modern Language Journal, 101, 548-565.
Henry, A., & Cliffordson, C. (2013). Motivation, gender, and possible selves. Language Learning, 63, 271-295.
Henry, A., Davydenko, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2015). The anatomy of directed motivational currents: Exploring intense and enduring periods of L2 motivation. Modern Language Journal, 99, 329-345.
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. Modern Language Journal, 100, 741-756.
Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. Modern Language Journal, 92, 270-283.
Kim, T.-Y. (2009). The sociocultural interface between ideal self and ought-to self: A case study of two Korean students’ ESL motivation. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 self (pp. 274-294). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Kim, H. (2019). The effects of experience abroad, English self-efficacy, and proficiency on the L2 motivational selves: A study of Korean EFL university students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1579218
King, J. (2016). Introduction to the dynamic interplay between context and the language learner. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 1-10). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Lamb, M. (2012). A self-system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62, 997-1023.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18, 140-165.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 33-46). London: Continuum.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45, 202-214.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015a). Ten ‘lessons’ from complex dynamic systems theory: What is on offer. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 11-19). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2015b). Complexity theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 227-244). London: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2017). The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han, (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11-50). John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 51, 55-72.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Complexity Theory: Relational systems in interaction and in interlocutor differences in second language development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008a). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008b). Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92, 200-213.
Lasagabaster, D. (2016). The relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium instruction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 315-332.
Lasagabaster, D. (2017). Language learning motivation and language attitudes in multilingual Spain from an international perspective. Modern Language Journal, 101, 583-596.
Leeman, J. (2015). Identity and heritage language education in the United States. Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 100-119.
Leeman, J. (2018). Critical language awareness and Spanish as a heritage language: Challenging the linguistic subordination of US Latinxs. In K. Potowski (Ed.), Handbook of Spanish as a minority/heritage language (pp. 345-358). New York: Routledge.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Legatto, J. J. (2011). A dynamic system approach to willingness to communicate: Developing an idiodynamic method to capture rapidly changing affect. Applied Linguistics, 32, 149-171.
May, S. (Ed.). (2014). The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
Mercer, S. (2011a). Towards an understanding of language learner self-concept. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mercer, S. (2011b). Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39, 335-346.
Mercer, S. (2014). The self from a complexity perspective. In S. Mercer & M. Williams (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA (pp. 160-176). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, S. (2015a). Social network analysis and complex dynamic systems. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 73-82). Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, S. (2015b). Dynamics of the self: A multilevel nested systems approach. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 139-163). Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, S. (2016). The contexts within me: L2 self as a complex dynamic system. In J. King (Ed.), The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner (pp. 11-28). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
Pawlak, M. (2012). The dynamic nature of motivation in language learning: A classroom perspective. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 249-278.
Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20, 654-671.
Pellegrino, V. A. (2005). Study abroad and second language use: Constructing the self. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sampson, R. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16, 317-335.
Segalowitz, N., & Trofimovich, P. (2012). Second language processing. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 179-192). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
Serafini, E. J. (2017). Exploring the dynamic long-term interaction between cognitive and psychosocial resources in adult second language development at varying proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 101, 369-390.
Serafini, E. J. (2019). Further situating learner possible selves in context: A proposal to replicate Henry & Cliffordson (2013) & Lasagabaster (2016). Language Teaching. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000144
Serafini, E. J. (2020). The impact of learner perceptions of interlocutor IDs on learner possible selves during a short-term experience abroad. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 210-243). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sugita McEown, M., Noels, K. A., & Chaffee, K. E. (2014). At the interface of the socio-educational model, self-determination theory and the L2 motivational self system models. In K. Csizér & M. Magid (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 19-50). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Thompson, A. S. (2017). Language learning motivation in the United States: An examination of language choice and multilingualism. Modern Language Journal, 101, 483-500.
Thompson, A. S., & Aslan, E. (2015). Multilingualism, perceived positive language interaction (PPLI), and learner beliefs: What do Turkish students believe? International Journal of Multilingualism, 12, 259-275.
Thompson, A. S., & Erdil-Moody, Z. (2014). Operationalizing multilingualism: Language learning motivation in Turkey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 2, 1-18.
Thompson, A. S., & Vásquez, C. (2015). Exploring motivational profiles through language learning narratives. Modern Language Journal, 99, 158-174.
Ushioda, E. (1996). Developing a dynamic concept of L2 motivation. In T. Hickey & J. Williams (Eds.), Language, education and society in a changing world (pp. 239-245). Dublin: IRAAL/Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2011). Context matters: A brief commentary on the papers by Housen et al. and Muñoz. IRAL, 49, 187-189.
Ushioda, E. (2015). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47-54). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (2017). The impact of global English on motivation to learn other languages: Towards an ideal multilingual self. Modern Language Journal, 101, 469-482.
van Geert, P. L. C. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
van Geert, P. L. C. (1995). Growth dynamics in development. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 313-338). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.
Verspoor M. H., de Bot K., & Lowie W. (Eds.). (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M. (2008) Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214-231.
Waninge, F., Dörnyei, Z., & de Bot, K. (2014). Motivational dynamics in language learning: Change, stability, and context. Modern Language Journal, 98, 704-723.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.