High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion


oral corrective feedback
learner beliefs
Vietnamese secondary school

How to Cite

Ha, X. V., Murray, J. C., & Riazi, A. M. (2021). High school EFL students’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback: The role of gender, motivation and extraversion. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.2.4


This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed-methods research design to examine the beliefs of Vietnamese EFL students concerning oral corrective feedback (CF) and the role of some individual differences in these beliefs. The data consisted of questionnaires completed by 250 Vietnamese high school students and follow-up interviews with 15 of them. Exploratory factor analysis revealed six latent factors underlying students’ beliefs about CF, namely, (1) output-prompting CF and eliciting recasts, (2) desire for CF, (3) non-verbal cues, (4) important errors, (5) input-providing CF, and (6) less important errors. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of the interviews showed that students were positive about CF. They liked both input-providing CF and output-prompting CF for all error types. Metalinguistic feedback was the most strongly preferred, while clarification request was the least preferred. Further statistical analyses revealed some interesting relationships between students’ beliefs about CF and their gender, English learning motivation, and self-rated introversion/extraversion. Females were more positive about CF than males, and extraverted females were more positive about input-providing CF than introverted females. Also, students learning English for exams were more positive about CF than those learning English for communication. Pedagogical implications for effective feedback provision in EFL contexts are discussed.



Agudo, J. M. (2015). How do Spanish EFL learners perceive grammar instruction and corrective feedback? Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 33(4), 411-425.

Akiyama, Y. (2017). Learner beliefs and corrective feedback in telecollaboration: A longitudinal investigation. System, 64, 58-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.007

Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00827.x

Cutillo, L. (2019). Parametric and multivariate methods. In S. Ranganathan, K. Nakai, & C. Schonbach (Eds.), Encyclopedia of bioinformatics and computational biology (pp. 738-746). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20335-X

Davis, A. (2003). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs regarding aspects of language learning. Evaluation & Research in Education, 17(4), 207-222.

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.

Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Routledge.

Ellis, R. (2008). Learner beliefs and language learning. Asian EFL Journal, 10(4), 7-25.

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054

Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 3-18). Routledge.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.

Gardner, R. C. (2010). Motivation and second language acquisition: The socio-educational model. Peter Lang.

Gilgun, J. (2011). Coding in deductive qualitative analysis. Current Issues in Qualitative Research: An Occasional Publication for Field Researchers from a Variety of Disciplines, 2(1), 1-4.

Ha, X. V. (2017). Primary EFL teachers’ oral corrective feedback in Vietnam: Beliefs and practices (Master of Research thesis). Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. https://www.researchonline.mq.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/mq:70822

Ha, X. V., & Murray, J. C. (2020). Corrective feedback: Beliefs and practices of Vietnamese primary EFL teachers. Advanced online publication. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820931897

Ha, X. V., & Murray, J. C. (2021). The impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers’ beliefs about corrective feedback. System, 96, 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102405

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching (4th ed.). Pearson.

Jean, G., & Simard, D. (2011). Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring? Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01143.x

Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). Learners’ beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86-109.

Kim, J., & Nassaji, H. (2018). Incidental focus on form and the role of learner extraversion. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 698-718.

Kim, Y., & Mostafa, T. (2021). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs and perspectives about corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of corrective feedback in second language learning and teaching (pp. 561-580). Cambridge University Press.

Lee, E. J. E. (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41(2), 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022

Leontjev, D. (2016). Exploring and reshaping learners’ beliefs about the usefulness of corrective feedback: A sociocultural perspective. ITL – International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 167(1), 46-77.

Li, S. (2017). Student and teacher beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 143-157). Routledge.

Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009). Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520

Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365

Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2003). Personality traits. Cambridge University Press.

Nakatsukasa, K. (2017). Gender and recasts: Analysis of males’ and females’ L2 development following verbal and gesture-enhanced recasts. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach (pp. 100-119). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.16.05nak

Nassaji, H. (2015). The interactional feedback dimension in instructed second language learning: Linking theory, research, and practice. Bloomsbury.

Oladejo, J. A. (1993). Error correction in ESL: Learner’s preferences. TESL Canada Journal, 10(2), 71-89.

Oliver, R. (2002). The patterns of negotiation for meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00138

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. Allen & Unwin.

Pawlak, M. (2011). Cultural differences in perceptions of form-focused instruction: The case of advanced Polish and Italian learners. In J. Arabski & A. Wojtaszek (Eds.), Aspects of culture in second language acquisition and foreign language learning (pp. 77-94). Springer.

Pawlak, M. (2014). Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Springer.

Pawlak, M. (2020). The effect of proficiency, gender, and learning style on the occurrence of negotiated interaction in communicative task performance. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 51-75). John Benjamins.

Quinn, P. G., & Nakata, T. (2017). The timing of oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching learning: Research, theory, applications, implications (pp. 35-47). Routledge.

Roothooft, H. (2014). The relationship between adult EFL teachers’ oral feedback practices and their beliefs. System, 46, 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.system.2014.07.012

Roothooft, H., & Breeze, R. (2016). A comparison of EFL teachers’ and students’ attitudes to oral corrective feedback. Language Awareness, 25(4), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1235580

Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 53-77). Oxford University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611-633. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12035.x

Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA‐Colombia. Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301-322). Oxford University Press.

Van Der Slik, F. W., Van Hout, R. W., & Schepens, J. J. (2015). The gender gap in second language acquisition: Gender differences in the acquisition of Dutch among immigrants from 88 countries with 49 mother tongues. PloS One, 10(11).

Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners’ anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012

Zhu, Y., & Wang, B. (2019). Investigating English language learners’ beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: a large-scale survey. Language Awareness, 28(2), 1-29.