Keywords
second language acquisition
natural order
learner corpus
English as a foreign language
How to Cite
Number of views: 1601
Number of downloads: 921
Abstract
The present study empirically scrutinizes the fixed natural order of grammatical morphemes relying on a manual analysis of an EFL learner corpus. Specifically, we test whether the accuracy order of L2 grammatical morphemes in the case of L1 Turkish speakers of English deviates from Krashen’s (1977) natural order and whether proficiency levels play a role in the order of acquisition of these morphemes. With this in mind, we focus on the (in)accuracy of nine English grammatical morphemes with 2883 cases manually tagged by the UAM Corpus Tool in the written exam scripts of Turkish learners of English. The results based on target-like use scores provide evidence for deviation from what is widely believed to be a set order of acquisition of these grammatical morphemes by second language learners. In light of such findings, we challenge the view that the internally driven processes of mastering grammatical morphemes in English for interlanguage users are largely independent of their L1. Regardless of L2 grammar proficiency in our data, the observed accuracy of some morphemes ranked low in comparison with the so-called natural order. These grammatical morphemes were almost exclusively non-existent features in participants’ mother tongue (e.g., third person singular –s, articles and the irregular past tense forms), thus suggesting the influence of L1 in this respect.
References
Akbaş, E., & Ölçü Dinçer, Z. (2021). Corpus of Turkish English exam scripts (TEES) (Version 1) [Data set]. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/72x973vn44.1
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. (1974). Is there a “natural sequence” in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24(2), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1974.tb00505.x
Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
Burt, M., Dulay, H., & Hernandez, E. (1973). Bilingual syntax measure. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Bybee, J., & Slobin, D. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58(2), 265-289. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1982.0021
Demarta Dabove, A. (2014). A study of morpheme order acquisition in an EFL corpus of L1 Spanish-L2 English: Some pedagogical implications (Unpublished thesis). University of Granada, Spain. http://hdl.handle.net/10481/30610
Dulay, H., & Burt, M. (1973). Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning, 23(2), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1973.tb00659.x
Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x
Ghonchepour, M., Pakzadmoghaddam, M., Kalantari Khandani, E., & Farrokhi Barfe, M. (2020). Accuracy order of grammatical morphemes in Persian EFL learners: Evidence for and against UG. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 12(25), 53-78. https://doi.org/10.30495/jal.2020.674937
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta‐analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147
Hamamcı, Z., & Hamamcı, E. (2018). A case study: Exploring the use of 3rd person singular –s in English in written register. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, 84-93. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.504253
Haznedar, B. (2007). The acquisition of tense-aspect in child second language English. Second Language Research, 23(4), 383-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080330
Izumi, E., & Isahara, H. (2004). Investigation into language learners’ acquisition order based on an error analysis of a learner corpus. In IWLeL 2004: An Interactive Workshop on Language e-Learning (pp. 63-71). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.575.9658&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Jia, G., & Fuse, A. (2007). Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by native Mandarin-speaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 1289-1299. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/090)
Krashen, S. (1977). Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In H. D. Brown, C. A. Yorio, & R. H. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL’77 - Teaching and learning English as a second language: Trends in research and practice (pp. 144-158). TESOL.
Kwon, E. (2005). The “Natural Order” of morpheme acquisition: A historical survey and discussion of three putative determinants. Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 1-20.
Larsen‐Freeman, D. (2010). Not so fast: A discussion of L2 morpheme processing and acquisition. Language Learning, 60, 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00556.x
Luk, Z. P., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive ‘s. Language Learning, 59, 721-754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00524.x
Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories (2nd ed.). Hodder Arnold.
Murakami, A. (2013). Cross-linguistic influence on the accuracy order of L2 English grammatical morphemes. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research: Looking back, moving ahead (pp. 325-334). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2016). L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes: A learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 365-401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352
Nomura, M. (2012). Variability in articles in Japanese EFL learners’ spoken and written production: A learner corpus-based approach. Corpus-based Language Education Research Report, 8, 281-302.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Hodder Education.
Pica, T. (1983). Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditions of exposure. Language Learning, 33(4), 465-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00945.x
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808838
Seog, D. S. Y. (2015). Accuracy order of grammatical morphemes of Korean EFL learners: Disparities among the same L1 groups. Linguistic Research, 32, 151-171. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.32.201507.008
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought to language” to “thinking for speaking.” In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70-96). Cambridge University Press.
Snape, N., García Mayo, M. del P., & Gürel, A. (2013). L1 transfer in article selection for generic reference by Spanish, Turkish and Japanese L2 learners. International Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2013/1/138701
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.