Keywords
task-modality
use of previously known languages
task-based interaction
How to Cite
Number of views: 661
Number of downloads: 643
Abstract
This article contributes to the scarcity of research on the interface between task-modality and the use of previously known languages (PKL) in young learners. It examines the use of Basque/Spanish by CLIL learners (aged 10-11) during oral interaction while completing two collaborative tasks in English: a speaking task and a speaking + writing task. Findings indicate that these learners are extensive users of their PKL. Task-modality is particularly evident in the case of amount of PKL use, as a higher number of PKL turns are obtained in the speaking + writing task. However, task-modality has a limited effect on the functions of PKL, which contrasts with previous studies with adults. Despite the extensive use of their PKL, these young and low-proficient learners employ them as cognitive tools that facilitate the organization of the tasks, the co-construction of meaning and the attention to formal aspects of language such as mechanics.
Funding
The grant awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (FFI2016-74950-P) (AEI/FEDER/UE)
The grant awarded by the Basque government (IT904-16)
References
Adams, R. (2006). L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality? ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 7-34.
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2008). Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243-265). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Alegría de la Colina, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. International Review of Applied Linguistics (IRAL), 47(3), 325-345.
Arratibel-Irazusta, I., & Martínez-Adrián, M. (2018). The use of previously known languages in the oral production of L3 English learners: A pseudolongitudinal study. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 229-254.
Arratibel-Irazusta, I., & Martínez-Adrián, M. (2019). The use of communication strategies in L3 English CLIL learners. In M. J. Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. Martínez-Adrián, & F. Gallardo-del-Puerto (Eds.), Crosslinguistic influence: From empirical evidence to classroom practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Azkarai, A. (2015). L1 use in EFL task-based interaction: A matter of gender? European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 159-179.
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2012). Does gender influence task performance in EFL? Interactive tasks and language related episodes. In E. Alcón Soler & M. P. Safont Jordá (Eds.), Language learners’ discourse across L2 instructional settings. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2015). Task modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 19, 550-571.
Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2017). Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21, 480-495.
Azkarai, A., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2017). Gender and age in child interaction in an EFL CLIL context: An exploratory study. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 103-123). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157-168.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bialystok, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1985). Toward a definition of metalinguistic skill. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 31(3), 229-251.
Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on crosslinguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 8-20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cenoz, J. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Implications for the organization of the multilingual mental lexicon. Bulletin VALS-ASLA (Vereinigung für angewandte Linguistik in der Schweiz), 78, 1-11.
Cenoz, J. (2009). Towards multilingual education: Basque educational research from an international perspective. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. (1994). Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque country. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 195-207.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Toward a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10, 543-562.
DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (2012). Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanced second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 160-188.
Enever, J. (2011). ELLiE: Early language learning in Europe. London: British Council.
Gallardo-del-Puerto, F. (2015, April). L1 influence in CLIL vs. EFL schoolchildren: A study of codeswitching and transfer lapses. Paper presented at the 33th AESLA International Conference, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
García Mayo, M. P. (Ed.) (2017). Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
García Mayo, M. P. (2018). Child task-based interaction in EFL settings: Research and challenges. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 119-143.
García Mayo, M. P., & Azkarai, A. (2016). EFL task-based interaction: Does task modality impact on language-related episodes? In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Research agenda and pedagogical implications (pp. 241-266). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
García Mayo, M. P., & Hidalgo, M. A. (2017). L1 use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System, 67, 132-145.
García Mayo, M. P., & Imaz Agirre, A. (2019). Task modality and pair formation method: Their impact on patterns of interaction and LREs among EFL primary school children. System, 80, 165-175.
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2015). Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 54, 40-54.
Gombert, J. E. (1992). Metalinguistic development. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J. (2015, April). The development of L1 use by schoolchildren in CLIL and non-CLIL contexts. Paper presented at the 33th AESLA International Conference, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid.
Haselgreen, A., Drew, I., & Sørheim, B. (2012). The young language learner: Research-based insights into teaching and learning. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
House, S., & Scott, K. (2009). Sparks 1. London: Richmond.
IBM Corp. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 19.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pre-task modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15, 183-199.
Lasagabaster, D. (2007). Trilingüismo escolar: Sobre la presencia del inglés en el sistema educativo vasco. Hizkunea, 10, 1-13.
Lasito, & Storch, N. (2013). Comparing pair and small group interactions on oral tasks. RELC Journal, 44, 361-375.
Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2016). Are CLIL learners simply faster or also different? Evidence from L1 use in the repair sequences and discourse markers of CLIL and EFL learners. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics (VIAL), 13, 127-145.
Lázaro-Ibarrola, A., & García Mayo, M. P. (2012). L1 use and morphosyntactic development in the oral production of EFL learners in a CLIL context. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 50, 135-160.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, D. (2002) Content and language integrated learning: The European dimension actions, trends and foresight potential. Brussels: European Commission.
Martínez-Adrián, M. (2020a). ¿Los juntamos? A study of L1 use in interactional strategies in CLIL vs. non-CLIL primary school learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 58(1), 1-27.
Martínez-Adrián, M. (2020b). The use of previously known languages and target language English during task-based interaction: A pseudolongitudinal study of primary-school CLIL learners. Euro-American Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages, 7(1), 59-77.
Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez-Mangado, M. J. (2015). L1 use, lexical richness, accuracy and complexity in CLIL and non-CLIL learners. Atlantis, Journal of the Spanish Association for Anglo-American Studies, 37, 175-197.
Martínez-Adrián, M., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Basterrechea, M. (2019). On self-reported use of communication strategies by CLIL learners in primary education. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 39-57.
Martínez-Adrián, M., Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Arratibel-Irazusta, I. (2019, September). Collaborative dialogue in young CLIL learners: A study on the effect of task modality. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Child Foreign/Second Language Learning (CFSLL), Pedagogical University of Cracow.
McWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Muñoz, C. (2007). Cross-linguistic influence and language switches in L4 oral production. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 73-94.
Muñoz, C. (2015). Time and timing in CLIL: a comparative approach to language gains. In M. J. Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp. 87-102). Berlin: Springer.
Muñoz, C. (2017). The development of language awareness at the transition from primary to secondary school. In M. P. García-Mayo, (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 49-68). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nikolov, M. (2009). Early learning of modern foreign languages: Processes and outcomes. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
Niu, R. (2009). Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 384-402.
Oliver, R., & Azkarai, A. (2017). Review of child second language acquisition (SLA): Examining theories and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 62-76.
Piaget, J. (1929). The child’s conception of the world. London: Routledge.
Ortega, L. (2015). Researching CLIL and TBLT interfaces. System, 54, 103-109.
Pawlak, M. (2019, September). Teaching foreign language grammar to children: The role of individual differences. Plenary talk at the 2nd International Conference on Child Foreign/Second Language Learning (CFSLL), Pedagogical University of Cracow.
Payant, C., & Kim, Y. J. (2019). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614-627.
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19, 261-279.
Pinter, A. (2007). Some benefits of peer-peer interaction: 10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 189-207.
Pinter, A. (2011). Children learning second languages. Basingstoke, U.K: Palgrave Macmillan
Pladevall-Ballester, E., & Vraciu, A. (2017). Exploring early EFL: L1 Use in oral narratives by CLIL and non-CLIL primary school learners. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 124–148). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Rayati, R. A., Yaqubi, B., & Harsejsani, R. (2012). L1 use and language-related episodes (LREs) in an EFL setting. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 3(4), 99-125.
Roehr-Brackin, K. (2018). Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.
Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions between second language learners: Exploring the role of gender (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, D.C.
Ross-Feldman, L. (2007). Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 52-77). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shintani, N. (2012). Repeating input-based tasks with young beginner learners: The role of the teacher. RELC Journal, 43, 39-51.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2010). Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14, 355-375.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, J. (2003). Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 760-770.
Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 251-274.
Tellier, A., & Roehr-Brackin, K. (2017). Raising children’s metalinguistic awareness to enhance classroom second language learning. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp. 22-48). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Tognini, R., & Oliver, R. (2012). L1 use in primary and secondary foreign language classrooms and its contribution to learning. In E. Alcón Soler, & M. P. Safont Jordá (Eds.), Discourse and learning across L2 instructional contexts (pp. 53-78). Amterdam: Rodopi.
UCLES. (2014). Key English test for schools. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.