Keywords
academic success
Turkish medium instruction
general English proficiency
higher education
How to Cite
Number of views: 2520
Number of downloads: 1421
Abstract
This article reports a quantitative study that investigated academic achievement in English medium instruction (EMI) courses at a public university in Turkey. Student test score data on EMI and Turkish medium instruction (TMI) courses as well as general English proficiency scores were collected in two academic divisions: the mathematical, physical, and life sciences (MPLS, N = 357); and the social sciences (N = 359). Analysis conducted at the macro (academic division), meso (academic department), and micro levels (academic program) showed subtle differences at each level. Overall, results were consistent: English language proficiency was a strong predictor of academic achievement of social science participants, whereas success in TMI courses predicted EMI success of MPLS participants. These results reinforce the notion that more language support should be given to social science students, whereas learning some content through TMI should be prioritized for MPLS students. Implications for language professionals and EMI practitioners are discussed, and suggestions are made for further research.
References
Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: The gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77(6), 1125-1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0323-5
Bolton, K., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). English as an academic language at a Swedish university: Parallel language use and the “threat” of English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(5), 429-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.670241
Brooks, L. W., & Dansereau, D. F. (1987). Transfer of information: An instructional perspective. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (Eds.), Transfer of learning (pp. 121-150). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-188950-0.50011-4
Cambridge ESOL. (2014). Preliminary English Test. Cambridge English Qualifications. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/preliminary/
Cohen, M. P. (1998). Determining sample sizes for surveys with data analyzed by hierarchical linear models. Journal of Official Statistics, 14(3), 267-275. https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ff271eeeca694f47ae99b942de61df83/determining-sample-sizes-for-surveys-with-data-analyzed-by-hierarchical-linear-models.pdf
Coyle, D. (2008). CLIL: A pedagogical approach from the European perspective. In N. Van Deusen-Scholland & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Second and foreign language education (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 97-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_92
Cummins, J. (2017). Teaching for transfer in multilingual school contexts. In O. García et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Bilingual and multilingual education (3rd ed., pp. 103-115). Springer. https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_8
Curle, S., Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., & Altay, M. (2020). Predictors of English medium instruction academic success: English proficiency versus first language medium. System, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102378
Dafouz, E., Camacho, M., & Urquia, E. (2014). “Surely they can’t do as well:” A comparison of business students’ academic performance in English-medium and Spanish-as-a-first-language medium programs. Language and Education, 28(3), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2013.808661
Dearden, J., Akincioglu, M., & Macaro, E. (2016). EMI in Turkish universities: Collaborative planning and student voices. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15435.39204
Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 455-486. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.3.5
Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (Eds.). (2013). English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Multilingual Matters.
Dong, Y. R. (2002). Integrating language and content: How three Biology teachers work with non-English speaking students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 40-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050208667745
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
Geranpayeh, A., & Taylor, L. (Eds.). (2013). Examining listening: Research and practice in assessing second language listening. Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). The language of science. In J. Webster (Ed.), The collected works of M.A.K. Halliday. Continuum.
Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction at a Chinese university: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13, 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9298-3
Kang, S., & Park, H. (2005). English as the medium of instruction in Korean engineering education. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21, 155-174.
Karakas, A. (2016). Turkish lecturers’ views on the place of mother tongue in the teaching of content courses through English medium. Asian Englishes, 18(3), 242-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2016.1229831
Khalifa, H., & Weir, C. J. (2009). Examining reading. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Kırkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and student perception of studying in an English-medium university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101-123.
Kuteeva, M., & Airey, J. (2014). Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent language policy developments. Higher Education, 67, 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6
Lemberger, N., & Vinogradova, O. (2002). Russian bilingual science learning: Perspectives from secondary students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050208667746
Li, M. (2018). The effectiveness of a bilingual education program at a Chinese university: A case study of social science majors. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(8), 897-912. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1231164
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-227-7/001
Macaro, E., & Akincioglu, M. (2018). Turkish university students’ perceptions about English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(3), 256-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2017.1367398
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
May, R. W., & Casazza, S. P. (2012). Academic major as a perceived stress indicator: Extending stress management intervention. College Student Journal, 46(2), 264-273. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ994215
Merton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56
Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120052071
Olivares, R. A. (2002). Communication, constructivism, and transfer of knowledge in the education of bilingual learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 5(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050208667743
OSYM Manual. (2019, December 16). Manual of student selection and placement center of Turkey. https://www.osym.gov.tr/TR,16858/2019-yuksekogretim-programlari-ve-kontenjanlari-kilavuzu.html
Roothooft, H. (2019). Spanish lecturers’ beliefs about English medium instruction: STEM versus humanities. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1707768
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2020). The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge.
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2020). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149-2161.
Shaw, S. D., & Weir, C. J. (2007). Examining writing: Research and practice in assessing second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Soruç, A., Altay, M., Curle, S., & Yüksel, D. (2021). Students’ academic language-related challenges in English Medium Instruction: The role of English proficiency and language gain. System, 103, 102651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102651
Soruç, A., Dinler, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). Listening comprehension strategies of EMI students in Turkey. In Y. Kırkgöz & K. Dikilitaş (Eds.), Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 265-287). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70214-8_15
Soruç, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). English as a medium of instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx017
Taylor, L. (Ed.). (2011). Examining speaking: Research and practice in assessing second language speaking (Vol. 30). Cambridge University Press.
Terraschke, A., & Wahid, R. (2011). The impact of EAP study on the academic experiences of international postgraduate students in Australia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.003
Thompson, G., Aizawa, I., Curle, S., & Rose, H. (2019). Exploring the role of self-efficacy beliefs and learner success in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1651819
Turhan, B., & Kırkgöz, Y. (2018). Motivation of engineering students and lecturers toward English medium instruction at tertiary level in Turkey. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 261-277. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/650416
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition (pp. 141-178). Georgetown University Press.
University of Oxford. (2020). Divisions and departments. http://www.ox.ac.uk/about/divisions-and-departments
Ward, J. (1999). How large a vocabulary do EAP engineering students need? Reading in a Foreign Language, 12, 309-323. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ601601
Ward, J. (2009). EAP reading and lexis for Thai engineering undergraduates. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.10.002
Watson, A. M., Newman, R. M. C., & Morgan, S. D. (2021). Metatalk and metalinguistic knowledge: The interplay of procedural and declarative knowledge in the classroom discourse of first-language grammar teaching. Language Awareness, 30(3), 257-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1905655
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.
Wolfsberger, M. (2012). L1 to L2 writing processes and strategy transfer: A low at lower proficiency writers. TESL EJ, 72, 1-5. http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej26/ej26a6/
Xie, W., & Curle, S. (2022). Success in English medium instruction in China: Significant indicators and implications. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 585-597.
Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., Altay, M., & Curle, S. (2021). A longitudinal study at an English Medium Instruction university in Turkey: The interplay between English language improvement and academic success. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0097
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.