Keywords
accuracy
fluency
CDST
English speech
How to Cite
Number of views: 847
Number of downloads: 295
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF), using longitudinal data. Conducted from the perspective of complex dynamic systems theory (CDST), this research adopted four CAF general measures to track the development of five Chinese undergraduates’ English speech over a 15-week period. LOWESS graphs supported by correlation analyses showed that there were individual differences in CAF relations. Different trade-off effects were found in the CAF development of four individuals. One learner improved in lexical complexity at the expense of accuracy, another learner improved in accuracy at the cost of lexical complexity, one student made progress in syntactic complexity but sacrificed fluency, and one improved in accuracy and lexical complexity while compromising fluency and syntactic complexity, respectively. Furthermore, the use of moving correlations demonstrated that CAF relations changed dynamically over time, revealing eight identified change patterns. These patterns exhibited varying degrees of variability, ranging from highest to medium to low-medium to lowest. Six patterns involved state changes, transitioning from a competitive to supportive relationship, for example.
Funding
Project of Humanities and Social Sciences funded by the Education De-partment of Jilin Province, China (Project No. JJKH20241400SK)
References
Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Re-search, 15(1), 35-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329
Awwad, A., & Tavakoli, P. (2022). Task complexity, language proficiency and working memory: Interaction effects on second language speech performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 60(2), 169-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2018-0378
Bassano, D., & van Geert, P. (2007). Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: A quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intra‐individual variability in early grammatical development. Developmental Science, 10(5), 588-612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00629.x
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalizing L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder. (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 23-48). Longman.
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Preview article: Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 226-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00148.x
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Evans, R., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Bifurcations and the emergence of L2 syntactic structures in a complex dynamic system. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574603
Ferrari, S. (2012). A longitudinal study of complexity, accuracy and fluency variation in second language development. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 277-298). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.12fer
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354
Foster, P., & Wigglesworth, G. (2016). Capturing accuracy in second language performance: The case for a weighted clause ratio. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 98-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000082
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy and fluency. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 1-20). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.01hou
Jackson, D. O., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta‐analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330-367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12008
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lambert, C., & Kormos, J. (2014). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in task-based L2 research: Toward more developmentally based measures of second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 35(5), 607-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu047
Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 141-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.2.141
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 579-589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp043
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 55-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12314
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Complexity theory: Relational systems in interaction and in interlocutor differences in second language development. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 189-208). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.53.08lar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Lennon, P. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40(3), 387-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x
Levkina, M., & Gilabert, R. (2012). The effects of cognitive task complexity on L2 oral production. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Di-mensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 171-198). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.08lev
Li, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2023). The development of accuracy and fluency in second language (L2) speaking related to self-efficacy through online scaffolding: A latent growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1371-1395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09950-7
Lowie, W. (2017). Lost in state space? Methodological considerations in complex dynamic theory approaches to second language development research. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen Freeman (pp. 123-141). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.48.07low
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2019). Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning, 69, 184-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12324
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2022). A complex dynamic systems theory perspective on speaking in second language development. In T. M. Derwing, M. J. Munro, & R. I. Thomson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking (pp. 39-53). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022497-5
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk. Lawrence Erlbaum.
McKee, G., Malvern, D., & Richards, B. (2000). Measuring vocabulary diversity using dedicated software. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 15(3), 323-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/15.3.323
Michel, M. C. (2017). Complexity, accuracy and fluency in L2 production. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 50-68). Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-4
Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 241-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.011
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect siz-es in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt013
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2
Skehan, P. (1996). Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 17-30). Heinemann.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. ERIC. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900209
Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. By-gate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 167-185). Longman.
Skehan, P. (2014). Limited attentional capacity, second language performance, and task-based pedagogy. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 211-260). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.08ske
Skehan, P., Bei, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 170-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811428414
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302
Taguchi, N. (2013). Production of routines in L2 English: Effect of proficiency and study-abroad experience. System, 41(1), 109-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.003
Tonkyn, A. P. (2012). Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency: Examining instructed learners’ short-term gains. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 221-244). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.10ton
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84
van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development: Change between complexity and chaos. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
van Geert, P. (1995). Growth dynamics in development. In R. F. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 313-337). The MIT Press.
van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25(3-4), 408-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.10.003
van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25(4), 340-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00140-6
Vercellotti, M. L. (2017). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 90-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv002
Verspoor, M., & de Bot, K. (2022). Measures of variability in transitional phases in second language development. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1, 85-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0026
Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & de Bot, K. (2021). Variability as normal as apple pie. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(S2). 20200034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0034
Verspoor, M., & van Dijk, M. (2011). Visualizing interaction between variables. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 85-98). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29.05ver
Yu, H., & Lowie, W. (2020). Dynamic paths of complexity and accuracy in second language speech: A longitudinal case study of Chinese learners. Applied Linguistics, 6, 855-877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz040
Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre‐task planning and on‐line planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.1.1
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cha Li, Mingcai Sui
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.