Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter?
pdf

Keywords

dynamic engagement
affective engagement
cognitive engagement
computer-mediated tasks
collaborative writing

How to Cite

Aubrey, S. (2022). Dynamic engagement in second language computer-mediated collaborative writing tasks: Does communication mode matter?. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.4

Number of views: 1659


Number of downloads: 1181

Abstract

This study takes a dynamic approach to investigating engagement, examining fluctuations in cognitive-affective variables at regular time intervals during online collaborative second language (L2) writing tasks. Using online conference software and online editing software, 16 university students who use English as an L2, completed two collaborative problem-solution L2 writing tasks in two communication modes: video-chat and text-chat. After each task, learners viewed videos of their performances in 12 three-minute segments and were asked to rate their engagement on two scales (interest, focus). They were then interviewed about their attributions for fluctuations in their ratings. Group-level analysis revealed that learners experienced significantly higher focus and interest during tasks performed in video-chat mode than text-chat mode. This was contrasted with an analysis from a dynamic perspective, which produced a more nuanced picture of individual engagement trajectories during the tasks. Dynamic patterns of engagement fell into either moderately steady, increasing, decreasing, or rollercoaster pattern categories. A content analysis of 32 interviews revealed four factors that accounted for changes in engagement during tasks: task design (e.g., task familiarity), task process (e.g., instances of collaboration), task condition (e.g., communication mode), and learner factors (e.g., perceptions of proficiency).

https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.4
pdf

References

Al-Shehri, S., & Gitsaki, C. (2010). Online reading: A preliminary study of the impact of integrated and split-attention formats on L2 students’ cognitive load. ReCALL, 22(3), 356-375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000212

Aubrey, S. (2017a). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683563

Aubrey, S. (2017b). Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 661-692.

Aubrey, S., King, J., & Almkiled, H. A. A. (2020). Language learner engagement during speaking tasks: A longitudinal study. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220945418

Aubrey, S., & Shintani, N. (2021). L2 writing and language learning in electronic environments. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 282-296). Routledge.

Boudreau, C., MacIntyre, P. D., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2018). Enjoyment and anxiety in second language communication: An idiodynamic approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.7

Chamberlin Quinlisk, C. (2008). Nonverbal communication, gesture and second language classrooms: A review. In S. G. McCafferty & G. Stam (Eds.), Gesture: SLA and classroom research (pp. 25-44). Routledge.

Chen, A. (2001). A theoretical conceptualization for motivation research in physical education: An integrated perspective. Quest, 53, 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2001.10491729

Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36(2), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013

Chun, D. M. (1998). Signal analysis software for teaching discourse intonation. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10125/25033

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial.

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. J. Elliot, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598-608). Guilford.

Dao, P., & Sato, M. (2021). Exploring fluctuations in the relationship between learners’ positive emotional engagement and their interactional behaviors. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211044238

Develotte, C., Guichon, N., & Vincent, C. (2010). The use of the webcam for teaching a foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment. ReCALL, 22(3), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000170

Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00204

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language and writing conventions development. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51-71.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld P. C., & Paris A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 6(1), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.005

Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Xu, X. (2020). An investigation into EFL learners’ motivational dynamics during a group communicative task: A classroom-based case study. System, 89(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102214

Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549-571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A., Vitta, J., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289

Hong Kong examinations and assessment authority. (2015). IELTS. http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/en/recognition/benchmarking/hkdse/ielts/

Hsu, H. C. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1542407

Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous language learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41-58.

Kessler, M., Polio, C., Xu, C., & Hao, X. (2020). The effects of oral discussion and text chat on L2 Chinese writing. Foreign Language Annals, 53(4), 666-685. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12491

Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development: An educational-psychological perspective. In L. Smith, C. Rogers, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Development and motivation: Joint perspectives (pp. 57-84), British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II(2).

Lai, C., Fei, R., & Roots, R. (2008). The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26(1), 70-90. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v26i1.70-90

Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665-680. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683559

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.

Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study in an elementary Spanish course. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.27.2.260-276

Li, M. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wiki-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752-769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.021

Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882-899. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981

Liao, J. (2018). The impact of face‐to‐face oral discussion and online text chat on L2 Chinese writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.06.005

Loewen, S., & Wolff, D. (2016). Peer interaction in FTF and CMC contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163-184). John Benjamins.

Long, M. H. (2015). Experimental perspectives on classroom interaction. In N. Markee (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction (pp. 60-73). Wiley- Blackwell.

MacIntyre, P. D. (2012). The idiodynamic method: A closer look at the dynamics of communication traits. Communication Research Reports, 29(4), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2012.723274

MacIntrye, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2021). The idiodynamic method: Willingness to communicate and anxiety processes interacting in real time. International Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0024.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Serroul, A. (2015). Motivation on a per-second timescale: Examining approach-avoidance motivation during L2 task performance. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 109-138). Multilingual Matters.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 312-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.2.312

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: Promise and pitfalls. In L. PytlikZillig, M. Bodvarsson, & R. Bruning (Eds.), Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together (pp. 1-19). Information Age Publishing.

Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2020). Teachers’ accounts of learners’ engagement and disaffection in the language classroom. The Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1800067

Németh, N., & Kormos, J. (2001). Pragmatic aspects of task-performance: The case of argumentation. Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 213-240. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500303

Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815609615

Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094

Phung, L., Nakamura, S., & Reinders, H. (2020). The effect of choice on affective engagement: Implications for task design. In P. Hiver, S. Mercer, & A. Al-Hoorie (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 163-181). Multilingual Matters.

Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684368

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). Springer.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Shearer, R. L., & Park, E. (2019). Theory to practice in instructional design. In M. G. Moore & W. C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 260-280). Routledge.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493-525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233

Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026144481800032

Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3-4), 242-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264

Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05514.x

Yamada, M., & Akahori, K. (2009). Awareness and performance through self- and partner’s image in videoconferencing. CALICO Journal, 27(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.27.1.1-25

Yim, S., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Web-based collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Methodological insights from text mining. Language Learning & Technology, 21(1), 146-165. https://doi.org/10125/44599

Zeigler, N. (2016). Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136-163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190516000039

Zhou, S., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2021). Measuring L2 engagement: A review of issues and applications. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 75-98). Multilingual Matters.