Keywords
Q methodology
teacher-induced boredom
student-induced boredom
activity-induced boredom
How to Cite
Number of views: 3198
Number of downloads: 1569
Abstract
The present study employed an interpretive approach to investigate individual learners’ viewpoints on foreign language learning boredom (FLLB). To this aim, a Q method, which shares features of both qualitative and quantitative research approaches, was used to explore 37 Iranian English as a foreign language (EFL) learners’ perceptions of potential sources of boredom in the classroom. Nonprobability purposeful sampling was used to select participants from two private language institutes in Mashhad, Iran. A hybrid-type Q sampling was employed to produce 40 statements related to the sources of FLLB. Using PQ Method, an exclusive statistical package for Q methodology, the Q sorts were intercorrelated and factor-analyzed. Three factors were extracted and rotated using varimax rotation and hand adjustment. Factor arrays and qualitative analyses were utilized to find and interpret three different accounts of FLLB. The three factors showed that the students held three divergent prototypical points of view about the sources of boredom experienced in EFL learning in class: (a) teacher-induced boredom, (b) student-induced boredom, and (c) activity-induced boredom. The findings also showed that different learner prototypes experience FLLB distinctly. Thus teachers should consider using different strategies to prevent or reduce this negative emotion in the context of L2 learning since otherwise this process could be impeded.
References
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. Yale University Press.
Chapman, K. E. (2013). Boredom in the German foreign language classroom (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations Publishing Publication (No. 3566370).
Collins, L., & Angelova, M. (2015). What helps TESOL methods students learn: Using Q methodology to investigate student views of a graduate TESOL methods class. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27(2), 247-260.
Damrad-Frye, R., & Laird, J. D. (1989). The experience of boredom: The role of the self-perception of attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2), 315-320.
Derakhshan, A., Kruk, M., Mehdizadeh, M., & Pawlak, M. (2021). Boredom in online classes in the Iranian EFL context: Sources and solutions. System, 101, 102556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102556
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P. D., & Henry, A. (2015). Motivational dynamics in language learning. Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge.
Eastwood, J. D., Cavaliere, C., Fahlman, S. A., & Eastwood, A. E. (2007). A desire for desires: Boredom and its relation to alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 1035-1045.
Eastwood, J. D., Frischen, A., Fenske, M. J., & Smilek, D. (2012). The unengaged mind: Defining boredom in terms of attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 482-495.
Fahlman, S. A. (2009). Development and validation of the multidimensional state boredom scale (Doctoral dissertation, York University). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
Fraschini, N., & Park, H. (2021). Anxiety in language teachers: Exploring the variety of perceptions with Q methodology. Foreign Language Annals. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12527
Gkonou, C., Daubney, M., & Dewaele, J.-M. (Eds.) (2017). New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications. Multilingual Matters.
Goetz, T., & Hall, N. C. (2014). Academic boredom. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), Educational psychology handbook series: International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 311-330). Routledge.
Goldberg, Y., Eastwood, J., LaGuardia, J., & Danckert, J. (2011). Boredom: An emotional experience distinct from apathy, anhedonia, or depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30, 647-666.
Harris, M. B. (2000). Correlates and characteristics of boredom proneness and boredom. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 576-598.
Hill, A. B. & Perkins, R. E. (1985). Towards a model of boredom. British Journal of Psychology, 76(2), 235-240.
Irie, K. (2014). Q methodology for post-social-turn research in SLA. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(1), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.2
Irie, K., & Ryan, S. (2014). Study abroad and the dynamics of change in learner L2 self-concept. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 520-552). Multilingual Matters.
Irie, K., Ryan, S., & Mercer, S. (2018). Using Q methodology to investigate pre-service EFL teachers’ mindsets about teaching competences. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 575-598. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.3
Jodaei, H., Zareian, G., Amirian, S. M. R., & Adel, S. M. R. (2021). The interplay of teacher motivation and learner motivation: A Q method study. Current Psychology, 40(1),1696-1710.
Komorowska, H. (2016). Difficulty and coping strategies in language education: Is positive psychology misrepresented in SLA/FLT? In Gabryś-Barker D. & Gałajda D. (Eds.). Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching. Springer.
Kruk, M. (2016). Variations in motivation, anxiety and boredom in learning English in Second Life. The EuroCALL Review, 24(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2016.5693
Kruk, M., Pawlak, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2021). Another look at boredom in language instruction: The role of the predictable and the unexpected. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 15-40. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.1.2
Kruk, M., & Zawodniak J. (2017). Nuda a praktyczna nauka języka angielskiego. Neofilolog, 49(1), 115-131.
Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2018). Boredom in practical English language classes: Insights from interview data. In L. Szymański, J. Zawodniak, A. Łobodziec, & M. Smoluk (Eds.), Interdisciplinary views on the English language, literature and culture (pp. 177-191). Uniwersytet Zielonogórski.
Kruk, M., & Zawodniak. J. (2020). A comparative study of the experience of boredom in the L2 and L3 classroom. English Teaching and Learning, 44, 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00056-0
Larson, R. W., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Boredom in the middle school years: Blaming schools versus blaming students. American Journal of Education, 99(4), 418-433.
LePera, N. (2011). Relationships between boredom proneness, mindfulness, anxiety, depression and substance use. The New Psychology Bulletin, 8(2), 15-25.
Li, C. (2021). A control-value theory approach to boredom in English class among university students in China. Modern Language Journal, 105, 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12693
Li, C., Dewaele, J-M., & Hu, Y. (2021). Foreign language learning boredom: Conceptualization and measurement. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0124
Macklem, G. L. (2015). Boredom in the classroom: Addressing student motivation, self-regulation, and engagement in learning. Springer.
Mercer-Lynn, K. B., Bar, R. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2014). Causes of boredom: The person, the situation, or both? Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 122-126.
Nakamura, S., Darasawang, P., & Reinders, H. (2021). A practitioner study on the implementation of strategy instruction for boredom regulation. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211010272
Pawlak, M. (2020). Individual differences and good language teachers. In C. Griffiths & Z. Tajeddin (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 121-132). Cambridge University Press.
Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J., & Pasikowski, S. (2020a). Investigating factors responsible for boredom in English classes: The case of advanced learners. System, 97, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102259
Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2020b). Investigating individual trajectories in experiencing boredom in the language classroom: The case of 11 Polish students of English. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820914004
Pawlak, M., Zawodniak, J. & Kruk, M. (2020c). Boredom in the foreign language classroom: A micro-perspective. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50769-5
Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549.
Pemberton, R., & Cooker, L. (2012). Self-directed learning: Concepts, practice, and a novel research methodology. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory, and practice (pp. 305-327). Palgrave Macmillan.
Rimm-Kaufman, S., Storm, M., Sawyer, B., Pianta, R., & LaParo, K. (2006). The teacher belief Q-sort: A measure of teachers’ priorities in relation to disciplinary practices, teaching practices, and beliefs about children. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 141-165.
Rodriguez, L. A., & Shepard, M. (2013). Adult English language learners’ perceptions of audience response systems (clickers) as communication aides: A Q-Methodology study. TESOL Journal, 4, 182-193.
Schmolck, P. (2002). PQ method (version 2.35). Retrieved from: http://schmolck.userweb.mwn.de/qmethod/
Slaughter, Y., Lo Bianco, J., Aliani, R., Cross, R., & Hajek, J. (2019). Language programming in rural and regional Victoria: Making space for local viewpoints in policy development. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 274-300.
Stainton Rogers, R. (1995). Q methodology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. V. Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 178-192). Sage.
Suárez-Orozco, M., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2013). Taking perspective: Context, culture, and history. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 141, 9-23.
Thackray, R. I. (1981). The stress of boredom and monotony: A consideration of the evidence. Psychosomatic Medicine, 43(2), 165-176.
Thomas, D., & Baas, L. (1992). The issue of generalization in Q methodology: Reliable schematics revisited. Operant Subjectivity, 16(1/2), 18-36.
Toth, Z. (2010). Foreign language anxiety and the advanced language learner: A study of Hungarian students of English as a foreign language. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tulis, M., & Fulmer, S. M. (2013). Students’ motivational and emotional experiences and their relationship to persistence during academic challenge in mathematics and reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 35-46.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2003). Q methodology, quantum theory and psychology. Operant Subjectivity, 26(1), 155-173.
Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method and interpretation. Sage.
Weinerman, J., & Kenner, C. (2016). Boredom: That which shall not be named. Journal of Developmental Education, 40(1), 18-23.
Zawodniak, J., & Kruk, M. (2018). Wpływ świata wirtualnego Second Life na zmiany w poziomie motywacji, lęku językowego i doświadczenia nudy u studentów filologii angielskiej. Neofilolog, 50(1), 65-85. https://doi.org/10.30438/ksj.2017.5.4.3
Zawodniak, J., Kruk, M., & Chumas, J. (2017). Towards conceptualizing boredom as an emotion in the EFL academic context. Konin Language Studies, 5(4), 425-441.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.