Keywords
instructed second language acquisition
comprehension
processing
first language
How to Cite
Number of views: 1238
Number of downloads: 923
Abstract
This study revisits and extends McManus and Marsden (2019a) to better understand how and why providing additional explicit information (EI) about learners’ first language (L1) alongside EI and comprehension practice in the second language (L2) improved the accuracy, speed, and stability of L2 comprehension of the French Imparfait, a functionally complex and late-acquired target feature. Building on previous L2 research that has provided instruction about L1 without analyzing L1 knowledge/use, the current study examines learners’ item-by-item comprehension of L1 sentences that was completed during the L2 instruction to better understand the learning mechanisms at play in McManus and Marsden’s (2019a) findings. Two groups of English-speaking learners (L2+L1, L2+L1prac; N = 36) received the same EI about aspect in French, followed by comprehension practice of French and English sentences. The L2+L1 group received additional EI about aspect in English. Results showed no impact of the instruction on L1 accuracy in either group, but the speed of L1 comprehension changed over time in the L2+L1 group. It is argued that the L2+L1 instruction directed attention to and clarified crosslinguistic differences in how L2 and L1 express the same meanings, which rendered the L2 practice more effective for noticing Imparfait and developing appropriate strategies for processing L2 forms. Implications for theory-building and instructional design are discussed.
References
ACTFL. (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages. ACTFL.
ACTFL. (2023, May 31). Guiding Principles for language learning. ACTFL. https://www.actfl.org/resources/guiding-principles-language-learning
Ayoun, D. (2013). The second language acquisition of French tense, aspect, mood and modality. John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.10
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Comajoan-Colomé, L. (2020). The aspect hypothesis and the acquisition of L2 past morphology in the last 20 years: A state-of-the-scholarship review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(5), 1137-1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000194
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Comajoan-Colomé, L. (2022). The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect. Language Teaching, 55(3), 289-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144482200009X
Bartoń, K. (2023). MuMIn: Multi-model inference (1.47.5). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Cintrón-Valentín, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2016). Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01284
de la Fuente, M. J., & Goldenberg, C. (2022). Understanding the role of the first language (L1) in instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Effects of using a principled approach to L1 in the beginner foreign language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 943-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820921882
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197002040
Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 164-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml015
Ellis, N. C., & Sagarra, N. (2011). Learned attention in adult language acquisition: A replication and generalization study and meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(4), 589-624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000325
Fernández, C. (2008). Reexamining the role of explicit information in pro-cessing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(3), 277-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080467
Field, A. P., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage.
Howard, M. (2005). Les contextes prototypiques et marqués de l’emploi de l’imparfait par l’apprenant du français langue étrangère. In Nouveaux développements de l’imparfait (pp. 175-197). Rodopi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401202336_011
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transfor-mation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434-446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cog-nition. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935927
Kihlstedt, M. (2015). Acquisition of the imparfait in L2 French in adults and children: The same or different?: A comparative case study of Swedish adults and children in an immersion setting. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 6(1), 74-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lia.6.1.03kih
Labeau, E. (2009). An imperfect mastery: The acquisition of the functions of imparfait by Anglophone learners. In E. Labeau & F. Myles (Eds.), The ad-vanced learner variety: The case of French (pp. 63-90). Peter Lang.
Lantolf, J. P., Xi, J., & Minakova, V. (2021). Sociocultural theory and concept-based language instruction. Language Teaching, 54(3), 327-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000348
Lonsdale, D., & Le Bras, Y. (2009). A frequency dictionary of French: Core vo-cabulary for learners. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883044
Lucas, M. (2020). Cross-linguistic influence and plural marking: Enhancing error recognition and written accuracy among Japanese EFL learners through web-based awareness-raising. Language Awareness, 29(2), 155-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1737096
MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 241-371). Routledge.
Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Cousineau, D., Benites, L., & Maehara, R. (2015). On the efficacy of procedures to normalize Ex-Gaussian distributions. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01548
Marsden, E. (2006). Exploring input processing in the classroom: An experimental comparison of processing instruction and enriched input. Language Learning, 56(3), 507-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00375.x
Marsden, E., & Chen, H.-Y. (2011). The roles of structured input activities in processing instruction and the kinds of knowledge they promote: Roles of structured input activities in processing instruction. Language Learning, 61(4), 1058-1098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00661.x
McManus, K. (2015). L1-L2 Differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings in a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(2), 155-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.2070.51
McManus, K. (2019). Awareness of L1 form-meaning mappings can reduce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammatical learning. Language Awareness, 28(2), 114-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1620756
McManus, K. (2021a). Examining the effectiveness of language-switching practice for reducing cross-language competition in L2 grammatical processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(1), 167-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000218
McManus, K. (2021b). Replication research in instructed SLA. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss & Y. Kim (Eds.), Instructed second language acquisition research methods (pp. 103-122). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.05mcm
McManus, K. (2022). Crosslinguistic influence and second language learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429341663
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2017). L1 explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 459-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600022X
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2018). Online and offline effects of L1 practice in L2 grammar learning: A partial replication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 459-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000171
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2019a). Signatures of automaticity during practice: Explicit instruction about L1 processing routines can improve L2 grammatical processing. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(1), 205-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000553
McManus, K., & Marsden, E. (2019b). Using explicit instruction about L1 to re-duce crosslinguistic effects in L2 grammar learning: Evidence from oral production in L2 French. Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 459-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12567
Meara, P., & Milton, J. (2003). X-lex: The Swansea levels test. Express Publishing.
Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classrooms: Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850961
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team. (2021). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (version 3.1-153). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
Porte, G. K., & McManus, K. (2019). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621395
Presson, N., MacWhinney, B., & Tokowicz, N. (2014). Learning grammatical gender: The use of rules by novice learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(4), 709-737. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000550
R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.2.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Segalowitz, N., & Segalowitz, S. J. (1993). Skilled performance, practice, and the differentiation of speed-up from automatization effects: Evidence from second language word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14(3), 369-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010845
Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect. Springer Netherlands. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6
Solovyeva, K., & DeKeyser, R. (2018). Response time variability signatures of novel word learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(1), 225-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000043
Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & White, J. (2005). The importance of form/meaning mappings in explicit form-focused instruction. In A. Housen (Ed.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 199-234). DeGruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372.2.199
Tyler, A. (2012). Cognitive linguistics and second language learning: Theoretical basics and experimental evidence. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203876039
Tyler, A., Ortega, L., & Uno, M. (Eds.). (2018). Usage-inspired L2 instruction: Researched pedagogy. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.49
VanPatten, B. (2004). Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. L. Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610195
Zhao, H., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The instructed learning of form-function mappings in the English article system. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12449
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kevin McManus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.