Abstract
Over the past 15 years, the L2 motivational self system (Dörnyei, 2005, 2009) has been a dominant framework in the field of second language (L2) motivation. Yet, since the model’s introduction, there has been a theoretical discordance between the two components associated with future self-images (the ideal L2 self and the ought-to L2 self) and the third component related to the actual process of learning (the L2 learning experience). To remedy this shortcoming, this study draws on Bakhtin’s (1981, 1986) theory of dialog. Bakhtin claims that any use of language is a dialog between self and others and that language is learned through the assimilation of speech genres used by others for similar purposes in typical situations of social communication. The analysis of interview data obtained from three Japanese-as-a-second-language learners shows how situation-specific and future-oriented motivations are related to each other. The learners’ engagement in dialog with imagined Japanese speakers is developed through their engagement in dialog with actual Japanese speakers, and regardless of whether the dialog is actual or imagined, the participants orient themselves to speech genres of the language that correspond to particular social contexts.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 19K13253.
References
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt22727z1
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Bobkina, J., Gómez-Ortiz, M. J., Núñez del Río, M. C., & Sastre-Merino, S. (2021). Why am I learning English? Spanish EFL sports science university students’ motivational orientations through the prism of the L2 motiva-tional self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 11(4), 543-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2021.11.4.4
Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005-2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006
Braxley, K. (2013). Mastering academic English: International graduate students’ use of dialogue and speech genres to meet the writing demands of graduate school. In J. K. Hall, G. Vitanova & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 149-169). Routledge.
Dӧrnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dӧrnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003
Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485893
Dӧrnyei, Z. & Ushioda. E. (2021). Teaching and researching motivation (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006743-2
Dufva, H., & Alanen, R. (2013). Metalinguistic awareness in dialogue: Bakhtinian considerations. In J. K. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 99-118). Routledge.
Fredricks, J. A. (2014). Eight myths of student disengagement: Creating class-rooms of deep learning. Corwin Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483394534
Grosjean, F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford University Press.
Harvey, L. (2017). Language learning motivation as ideological becoming. System, 65, 69-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.009
Kramsch, C. (2000). Social discursive constructions of self in L2 learning. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sosiocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 133-153). Oxford University Press.
Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 150-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.013
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Nakamura, T. (2019a). Language acquisition and the multilingual ideal: Exploring Japanese language learning motivation. Bloomsbury Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350088184
Nakamura, T. (2019b). Understanding motivation for learning languages other than English: Life domains of L2 self. System, 82, 111-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.006
Nakamura, T. (2021). Motivation, imagined self, and speech genres: Bakhtinian considerations. System, 99, 102525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102525
Papi, M., Bondarenko, A. V., Mansouri, S., Feng, L., & Jiang, C. (2019). Rethinking L2 motivation research: The 2×2 model of L2 self-guides. Studies in Second Lan-guage Acquisition, 41(2), 337-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000153
Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505056
Richards, K. (2009). Interviews. In J. Heigham & R. A. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction (pp. 182-199). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517_9
Sullivan, P. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: Using a dialogical approach. SAGE Publications.
Taguchi, T., Magid, M., & Papi, M. (2009). The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 66-97). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-005
Ushioda, E. (2001). Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking. In Z. Dӧrnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 93-126). University of Hawaii Press.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dӧrnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-012
Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(3), 199-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538701
Ushioda, E. (2016). Language learning motivation through a small lens: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 49(4), 564-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000173
Vitanova, G. (2013). Authoring the self in a non-native language: A dialogic approach to agency and subjectivity. In J. K. Hall, G. Vitanova, & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives (pp. 149-169). Routledge.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Seminar Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Harvard University Press.
You, C. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2016). Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 495-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu046
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Toshiyuki Nakamura
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.