Young beginning learners’ vocabulary learning via input and output tasks: The role of working memory
PDF

Keywords

input tasks
output tasks
vocabulary learning
vocabulary retention
working memory

How to Cite

Teng, M. F. (2024). Young beginning learners’ vocabulary learning via input and output tasks: The role of working memory. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.36123

Number of views: 269


Number of downloads: 279

Abstract

Working memory (WM) is essential to vocabulary learning. However, limited attention has been paid to young beginner learners’ vocabulary development under various task conditions from the perspective of WM. This study investigates how two types of WM – complex WM and phonological short-term memory – may influence two instructional approaches (i.e., input and output tasks) on picking up new words. 93 young learners studying English as a foreign language (EFL) participated in input and output tasks and four vocabulary assessments. These assessments functioned as a pretest, immediate posttest, and delayed posttest. The participants also took two WM tests: an operation span test for complex WM and a word repetition test for phonological short-term memory. The results demonstrated that: (1) both input and output tasks significantly influenced the learning and retention of new words, (2) complex WM did not substantially predict task effects on the learning and retention of new words, and (3) phonological WM had a notable impact on learning and retaining new words under the input and output task conditions. The findings emphasize the role of WM for EFL young learners’ vocabulary learning through tasks.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.36123
PDF

References

Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Erlbaum.

Atkins, P. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(4), 537-552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010353

Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature, Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 829-839. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). Aca-demic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1

Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J. & Allen, R. J. (2019). From short-term store to multicomponent working memory: The role of the modal model. Memory & Cognition, 47, 575-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0878-5

Bergström, D., Norberg, C., & Nordlund, M. (2022). “Words are picked up along the way” – Swedish EFL teachers’ conceptualizations of vocabu-lary knowledge and learning. Language Awareness, 31(4), 393-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1893326

Cerezo, L., Caras, A., & Leow, R. P. (2016). The effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish Gustar Structures. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(2), 265-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139

Cheung, H. (1996). Nonword span as a unique predictor of second language vocabulary learning. Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 867-873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.32.5.867

Clark, E. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554377

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Wilhelm, O. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspective on learn-ing and practical second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Wil-liams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge University Press.

DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97-113). Lawrence Erlbaum.

DeKeyser, R. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(Suppl 2), 189-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x

de la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabu-lary: The role of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102001043

de la Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr196oa

Duong, P.-T., Montero Perez, M., Desmet, P., & Peters, E. (2021). Differential effects of input-based and output-based tasks on L2 vocabulary learning. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée, 24(3), 120-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.31183

Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking, and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 91-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014698

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford Univer-sity Press.

Ellis, R. (2012). Language teaching research and pedagogy. Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118271643

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30, 419-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00047-7

Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01114.x

Engel, M., & Gathercole, E. (2012). Executive and phonological processes in second language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 974-986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028390

Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2018). Task-based language teaching for beginner-level learners of L2 French: An exploratory study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 74, 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3831

Erlam, R., & Ellis, R. (2019). Input-based tasks for beginner-level learners: An approximate replication and extension of Erlam & Ellis (2018). Language Teaching, 52(4), 490-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000216

Gary, G., & Macken, B. (2015). Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: Why digit span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition, 144, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009

Gasser, M., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Learning nouns and adjectives: A connectionist account. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 269-306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386537

Gathercole, S. (2006) Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27(4), 513-543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716406060383

Gathercole, S. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). Evaluation of the role of phono-logical STM in the development of vocabulary in children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 200-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90044-2

Gathercole, S., & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A(1), 1-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980042000002

Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2018). Aptitude-treatment interaction in L2 learning: A research synthesis. Studies in English Education, 4, 803-830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22275/SEE.23.4.02

Henriksen, B. (2008). Declarative lexical knowledge. In D. Albrechtsen, K. Haastrup, & B. Henriksen (Eds.), Vocabulary and writing in a first and second language (pp. 22-66). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593404_2

Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001). Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 51(3), 539-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00164

Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (Eds.). (1999). Interaction hypothesis. Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics: A handbook for language teaching (p. 174). Blackwell Publishers.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1982.tb00476.x

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26(2), 175-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00002-5

Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 149-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.149

Laufer, B., & Rozovski-Roitblat, B. (2015). Retention of new words: Quantity of encounters, quality of task, and degree of knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 687-711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559797

Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12030.x

Li, S., Hiver, P., & Papi, M. (Eds.). (2022). Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and individual differences. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003270546

Liu, Y. T., Nassaji, H., & Tseng, W. T. (2021). Effects of internal and external attentional manipulations and working memory on second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211030130

Ma, Q., & Sin, C. (2015). Teaching young learners English vocabulary with reading-based exercises in a real classroom situation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 125-138.

Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 179-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000125

McDonald, J. A., & Reynolds, B.L. (2023). Learning semantic and thematic vocabulary clusters through embedded instruction: Effects on very young English learners’ vocabulary acquisition and retention. Applied Linguistics Review, 14(5), 1129-1156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0102

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne (Eds.), Foreign language learning: Psycholinguistic studies on training and retention (pp. 339-364). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873

Owen, A. M., McMillan, K. M., Laird, A. R., & Bullmore, E. (2005). N-back working memory paradigm: A meta-analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 46-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20131

Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2017). Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 381-402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815618428

Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00690.x

Ringbom, H. (1987). The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Multilingual Matters.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293977

Schmitt, N., & Redwood, S. (2011). Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. In F. Meunier, S. De Cock, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora: In honor of Sylviane Granger (pp. 173-209). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.12sch

Shintani, N. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15, 137-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388692

Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.9

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Newbury House.

Takimoto, M. (2009). The effects of input-based tasks on the development of learners’ pragmatic proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 1-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm049

Teng, F. (2018). The effect of focus on form and focus on forms instruction on the acquisition of phrasal verbs by Chinese students. Asian EFL Journal, 20 (2), 136-164.

Teng, F. (2020). Retention of new words learned incidentally from reading: Word exposure frequency, L1 marginal glosses, and their combination. Language Teaching Research, 24(6), 785-812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819829026

Teng, F. (2022). The roles of second-language proficiency level and working memory on vocabulary learning from word-focused exercises. RELC Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221102228

Teng, F. (2023). Effectiveness of captioned videos for incidental vocabulary learning and retention: The role of working memory. Computer Assisted Language Learning. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nz5pg

Teng, F., & Zhang, D. (2023). The associations between working memory and the effects of multimedia input on L2 vocabulary learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(3), 1021-1049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0130

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5

Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 498-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192720

Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.

VanPatten, B. (2004). Input processing in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 5-32). Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610195

Vogan, V. M., Morgan, B. R., Powell, T. L., Smith, M. L., & Taylor, M. J. (2016). The neurodevelopmental differences of increasing verbal working memory demand in children and adults. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 19-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.008

Webb, S. A., & Chang, A, C.-S. (2015). Second language vocabulary learning through extensive reading: How does frequency and distribution of occurrence affect learning? Language Teaching Research, 19(6), 667-686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814559800

Yang, Y., Shintani, N., Li, S., & Zhang, Y. (2017). The effectiveness of post-reading word-focused activities and their associations with working memory. System, 70, 38-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.012

Yeung, S. S., Ng, M. L., Qiao, S., & Tsang, A. (2019). Effects of explicit L2 vocabulary instruction on developing kindergarten children’s target and general vocabulary and phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 33(3), 671-689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09982-3