A classroom-based study on the effects of WCF on accuracy in pen-and-paper versus computer-mediated collaborative writing
PDF

Keywords

computer-mediated collaborative writing
feedback processing
L2 accuracy
pen-and-paper writing
written corrective feedback

How to Cite

González-Cruz, B., Cerezo, L., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2022). A classroom-based study on the effects of WCF on accuracy in pen-and-paper versus computer-mediated collaborative writing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.5

Number of views: 454


Number of downloads: 690

Abstract

This study compared the effects of computer-mediated (CM) versus pen-and-paper (P&P) writing on written accuracy and feedback processing in tasks written and rewritten collaboratively following a pedagogical treatment in two intact authentic classrooms. The study involved 32 secondary education low-proficiency English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners writing two descriptive texts collaboratively and receiving in-class training in the identification and correction of grammatical, lexical, and mechanical errors. Participants were provided with unfocused direct error correction (EC). Error logs were used to facilitate noticing of teacher corrections (i.e., feedback processing). Dyads were required to rewrite their texts for evidence of feedback uptake. Results indicate that writing collaboratively on the computer with the availability of the Internet contributes to increased grammatical and lexical accuracy. No differences were found between writing environments regarding feedback processing or accuracy of rewritten texts.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.5
PDF

References

Abrams, Z. I. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning and Technology, 23, 22-42. https://doi.org/10125/44681

Adair-Hauck, B., Donato, R., & Cumo-Johanssen (2010). Using a storybased approach to teach grammar. In J. L. Shrum & E. W. Glisan (Eds.), Teachers’ handbook: Contextualized foreign language instruction (pp. 216-244, 4th ed.). Heinle Cengage Learning.

Alharbi, M. A. (2019). The role of an instructor’s asynchronous feedback in promoting students’ interaction and text revisions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n3p23

Bitchener, J. (2019). The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 85-105). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547.007

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783095056

Cánovas Guirao, J., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2015). The use of models as a written feedback technique with young EFL learners. System, 52, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.002

Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2019). What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173-187). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-12

Chan, S., Chan, C., Derbie, A. Y., Hui, I., Tan, D., Pang, M., Lau, S., & Fong, K. (2017). Chinese calligraphy writing for augmenting attentional control and working memory of older adults at risk of mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 58(3), 735-746. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170024

Cheung, Y. L. (2015). A comparative study of paper-and-pen versus computer-delivered assessment modes on students’ writing quality: A Singapore study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0229-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0229-2

Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correc-tion and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 451-485. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612

Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2020). Exploring young learners ‘s engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 95, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102374

Coyle, Y., Nicolás-Conesa, F., & Cerezo, L. (in press). Overview of methodological procedures in extant research on written corrective feedback processing. In R. M. Manchón & J. Roca de Larios (Eds.), Research methods in the study of writing processes. John Benjamins.

DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.4.609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.4.609

Elabdali, R. (2021). Are two heads really better than one? A meta-analysis of the L2 learning benefits of collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100788 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100788

Ellis, N.C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024

Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2015). The effects of dynamic written corrective feedback: A 30-week study. Journal of Response to Writing, 1(2), 6-34. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol1/iss2/2

Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2019). The effects of written corrective feedback: A critical synthesis of past and present research. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 28-52. https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.37949

Lee, H. K. (2004). A comparative study of ESL writers’ performance in a paper-based and a computer-delivered writing test. Assessing Writing, 9, 4-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2004.01.001

Leow, R. P. (2020). L2 writing to learn: Theory, research, and a curricular ap-proach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 95-117). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo

Li, J. & Cumming, A. (2001). Word processing and second language writing: A longitudinal case study. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 127-152.

Manchón, R. M (2014). The distinctive nature of task repetition in writing. Implications for theory, research and pedagogy. ELIA, 14, 13-41. https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2014.i14.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2014.i14.02

Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa, F., Cerezo, L., & Criado, R. (2020). L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 241-263). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man

Nicolás-Conesa, F., Manchón, R.M., & Cerezo, L. (2019). The effect of unfocused direct and indirect written corrective feedback on rewritten texts and new texts: Looking into feedback for accuracy and feedback for acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 848-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12592

Owston, R.D., Murphy, S., & Wideman, H. H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students’ writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(3), 249-276.

Pearson, W. S. (2022). A typology of the characteristics of teachers’ written feedback comments on second language writing. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2024937

Pennington, M. C. (1996). Writing the natural way: On computer. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 9(2-3), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822960090205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822960090205

Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2022). Learners’ engagement with WCF in individual and collaborative L2 writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 81-93). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-11

Saeed, M. A., & Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020). Exploring teacher interactive e-feedback on students’ writing through Google Docs: Factors promoting interactivity and potential for learning. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 360-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1786711

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/APPLIN/11.2.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.003

Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699954

Storch, N. (2018). Research timeline: Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444818000320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320

Storch, N. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on L2 writing and language learning in collaborative writing and the collaborative processing of WCF. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 81-93). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-4

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532

Suzuki, W. (2012). Written languaging, direct correction, and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 62(4), 1110-1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x

Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge University Press.

Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95-108). Continuum.

Vasylets, L., Mellado, M. D., & Plonsky, L. (2022). The role of cognitive individual differences in digital versus pen-and-paper writing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 721-743. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.9

Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012a). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback? Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364-374. https://10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005

Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012b). Feedback and writing development through collaboration: A socio-cultural approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 69-99). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078303.69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078303.69

Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49. 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100753

Zhang, M., Gibbons, J., & Li, M. (2021). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A systematic review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100854 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100854

Zhi, M., & Huang, B. (2021). Investigating the authenticity of computer- and paper-based ESL writing tests. Assessing Writing, 50, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100548