Keywords
type of linguistic item
ISLA applied
think aloud protocols
depth of processing
How to Cite
Number of views: 328
Number of downloads: 568
Abstract
Whether type of written corrective feedback (WCF) impacts L2 learning has been investigated for decades. While many product-oriented studies report conflicting findings, the paucity of studies adopting both a process-oriented and curricular approach (e.g., Caras, 2019) underscores the call for further research on: a) the processing dimension of L2 writers’ engagement with WCF in this instructed setting (Manchón & Leow, 2020), b) from an ISLA applied perspective (Leow, 2019a; Leow & Manchón, 2022), and c) any potential relationship with subsequent performances. Also, whether type of linguistic item (e.g., morphological vs. syntactic) plays a role in the processing dimension also warrants further probing. This preliminary quasi-experimental study explored the cognitive processes of 10 adult L2 writers with minimal previous exposure to Spanish interacting with WCF (both direct and metalinguistic) on morphological and syntactic errors. Think aloud data gathered from three compositions written within the natural writing conditions of a foreign language curriculum were transcribed, coded for depth of processing (DoP) (Leow, 2015), and correlated with subsequent performances on the target items. The results revealed: 1) a higher DoP for metalinguistic WCF, 2) differences in processing of linguistic items, 3) similar DoP over time, and 4) a beneficial relationship between DoP and subsequent performances. Recommendations for future research underscore the importance of acknowledging variables within the instructed setting that may impact a pure effect of WCF on L2 development.
References
Bergsleithner, J. M. (2019). The role of prior knowledge in depth of processing during written production: A preliminary investigation. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 104-118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-8
Caras, A. (2019). Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188-200). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-13
Cerezo, L., & Caras, A., & Leow, R. P. (2016). Effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish “gustar” structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139
Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multistage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002
Housen, A., & Simoens, H. (2016). Introduction: Cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176
Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522
Leow, R. P. (2012). Explicit and implicit learning in the L2 classroom: What does the research suggest? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 2, 117-129.
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074
Leow, R. P. (2019a). From SLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 485-493). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33
Leow, R. P. (Ed.). (2019b). The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080
Leow, R. P. (2020). L2 writing-to-learn: Theory, research, and a curricular approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 95-117). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo
Leow, R. P. (2022). The influence of learning contexts on the psycholinguistics of L2 learning. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp. 373-386). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018872-35
Leow, R. P., & Donatelli, L. (2017). The role of (un)awareness in SLA. Language Teaching, 50, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000039
Leow, R. P., & Manchón, R. M. (2022). Expanding research agendas: Directions for future research agendas on writing, language learning and ISLA. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 299-311). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-31
Leow, R. P., & Suh, B.-R. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on writing, corrective feedback, and language learning in individual writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 9-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-3
Manchón, R. M. (Ed.). (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31
Manchón, R. M., & Leow, R. P. (2020). Investigating the language learning potential of L2 writing: Methodological considerations for future research agendas. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 336-355). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.14man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.17man
Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa, F., Cerezo, L., & Criado, R. (2020). L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback: Depth of processing via written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching (pp. 241-265). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man
Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y. (2019). Learners’ use of indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214-228). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-15
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.