WCF processing in the L2 curriculum: A look at type of WCF, type of linguistic item, and L2 performance
PDF

Keywords

WCF processing
type of linguistic item
ISLA applied
think aloud protocols
depth of processing

How to Cite

Leow , R. P., Thinglum , A., & Leow , S. A. (2022). WCF processing in the L2 curriculum: A look at type of WCF, type of linguistic item, and L2 performance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 651–673. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.6

Number of views: 407


Number of downloads: 643

Abstract

Whether type of written corrective feedback (WCF) impacts L2 learning has been investigated for decades. While many product-oriented studies report conflicting findings, the paucity of studies adopting both a process-oriented and curricular approach (e.g., Caras, 2019) underscores the call for further research on: a) the processing dimension of L2 writers’ engagement with WCF in this instructed setting (Manchón & Leow, 2020), b) from an ISLA applied perspective (Leow, 2019a; Leow & Manchón, 2022), and c) any potential relationship with subsequent performances. Also, whether type of linguistic item (e.g., morphological vs. syntactic) plays a role in the processing dimension also warrants further probing. This preliminary quasi-experimental study explored the cognitive processes of 10 adult L2 writers with minimal previous exposure to Spanish interacting with WCF (both direct and metalinguistic) on morphological and syntactic errors. Think aloud data gathered from three compositions written within the natural writing conditions of a foreign language curriculum were transcribed, coded for depth of processing (DoP) (Leow, 2015), and correlated with subsequent performances on the target items. The results revealed: 1) a higher DoP for metalinguistic WCF, 2) differences in processing of linguistic items, 3) similar DoP over time, and 4) a beneficial relationship between DoP and subsequent performances. Recommendations for future research underscore the importance of acknowledging variables within the instructed setting that may impact a pure effect of WCF on L2 development.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.6
PDF

References

Bergsleithner, J. M. (2019). The role of prior knowledge in depth of processing during written production: A preliminary investigation. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 104-118). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-8

Caras, A. (2019). Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188-200). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-13

Cerezo, L., & Caras, A., & Leow, R. P. (2016). Effectiveness of guided induction versus deductive instruction on the development of complex Spanish “gustar” structures: An analysis of learning outcomes and processes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 265-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000139

Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multistage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.09.002

Housen, A., & Simoens, H. (2016). Introduction: Cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176

Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522

Leow, R. P. (2012). Explicit and implicit learning in the L2 classroom: What does the research suggest? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 2, 117-129.

Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074

Leow, R. P. (2019a). From SLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 485-493). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33

Leow, R. P. (Ed.). (2019b). The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080

Leow, R. P. (2020). L2 writing-to-learn: Theory, research, and a curricular approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 95-117). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo

Leow, R. P. (2022). The influence of learning contexts on the psycholinguistics of L2 learning. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp. 373-386). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003018872-35

Leow, R. P., & Donatelli, L. (2017). The role of (un)awareness in SLA. Language Teaching, 50, 189-211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000039

Leow, R. P., & Manchón, R. M. (2022). Expanding research agendas: Directions for future research agendas on writing, language learning and ISLA. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 299-311). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-31

Leow, R. P., & Suh, B.-R. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on writing, corrective feedback, and language learning in individual writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 9-21). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-3

Manchón, R. M. (Ed.). (2011). Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31

Manchón, R. M., & Leow, R. P. (2020). Investigating the language learning potential of L2 writing: Methodological considerations for future research agendas. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 336-355). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.14man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.17man

Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa, F., Cerezo, L., & Criado, R. (2020). L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback: Depth of processing via written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching (pp. 241-265). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man

Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y. (2019). Learners’ use of indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214-228). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-15

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011