Heritage, second and third language learner processing of written corrective feedback: Evidence from think-alouds


written corrective feedback
depth of processing
heritage language learners
third language learners

How to Cite

Bowles , M. A., & Gastañaga , K. (2022). Heritage, second and third language learner processing of written corrective feedback: Evidence from think-alouds. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.4.7

Number of views: 309

Number of downloads: 554


This study compares the processing of three different types of written corrective feedback (WCF) by heritage language (HL), second language (L2), and third language (L3) learners who wrote and revised three short essays and received a different type of WCF for each essay (i.e., direct, coding, or underlining). Comparison of pre- and post-feedback texts and analysis of think-alouds served as the basis for determining whether one type of feedback promoted higher depth of processing (DoP) and whether this processing was mediated by error type and language background. The findings indicate that feedback type did interact with DoP, and that this interaction was in some ways mediated by learner background and error type. This research serves as a first step toward understanding how these three learner groups are impacted by these commonly used feedback types and is therefore important to drive evidence-based pedagogical decisions.



Association of American Colleges & Universities. (2019, March). Facts & figures: College students are more diverse than ever. Faculty and administrators are not. https://www.aacu.org/aacu-news/newsletter/2019/march/facts-figures

Bialystok, E. (2001). Metalinguistic aspects of bilingual processing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 169-181. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190501000101

Birdsong, D., Gertken, L. M., & Amengual, M. (2012). Bilingual language profile: An easy-to-use instrument to assess bilingualism. COERLL, University of Texas at Austin. https://sites.la.utexas.edu/bilingual/

Bowles, M. A. (2010). The think-aloud controversy in second language research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856338

Bowles, M. A. (2011). Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 247-271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263110000756

Bowles, M. A., & Montrul, S. (2017). Instructed heritage language acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 488-502). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-27

Caras, A. (2019). Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 186-198). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-13

Carreira, M., & Kagan, O. (2011). The results of the national heritage language survey: Implications for teaching, curriculum design, and professional development. Foreign Language Annals, 44(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01118.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2010.01118.x

Cenoz, J. (2013). The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching, 46(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000218

Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2019). What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173-187). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-12

DeRobles, G. (2019). The effects of type of written corrective feedback and level of proficiency on processing and accuracy in heritage language learners of Spanish. (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University).

Gatti, A., & O’Neill, T. (2017). Who are heritage writers? Language experiences and writing proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 50(4), 734-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12291

Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2010). Factors influencing oral corrective feedback provision in the Spanish foreign language classroom: Investigating instructor native/nonnative speaker status, SLA education, & teaching experience. (Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University). https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/553240/gurzynski-WeissLaura.pdf?sequence=1

Kang, E. Y., & Han, Z. (2022). Written corrective feedback: Short-term and long-term effects on language learning. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 213-225). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-23

Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think‐alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.522

Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887074

Leow, R. P. (2020). L2 writing-to-learn: Theory, research, and a curricular approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas (pp. 95-118). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.56.05leo

Leow, R., P., & Manchón, R. M. (2022). Directions for future research agendas on L2 writing and feedback as language learning from an ISLA perspective. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 299-311). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-31

Looney, D., & Lusin, N. (2019). Enrollments in languages other than English in United States institutions of higher education, summer 2016 and fall 2016: Final Report. Modern Language Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599007.pdf

Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2011). Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners’ perceptions of the language learning potential of L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 181-207). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.13man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.31.13man

Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa, F., Cerezo, L., & Criado, R. (2020). L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback: Depth of processing via written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching (pp. 241-265). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.55.11man

Montrul, S. (2004). Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morphosyntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728904001464

Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R. (2003). Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterite-imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351-398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263103000159

Mrak, A. (2020). Developing writing in Spanish heritage language learners: An integrated process approach. Dimension. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1249861

Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y. (2019). Learners’ use of indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self- correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214-228). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315165080-15

Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.004

Qi, D., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Exploring the role of noticing in a three- stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 277-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00046-7

Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2022). Learners’ engagement with written corrective feedback in individual and collaborative L2 writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and writing (pp. 81-93). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199691-11

Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67-100. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070039

Suh, B. R. (2010). Written feedback in second language acquisition: Exploring the roles of type of feedback, linguistic targets, awareness and concurrent verbalization (Doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University).

Suzuki, W. (2012). Written languaging, direct correction and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 62, 1110-1133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00720.x

Suzuki, W. (2017). The effect of quality of written languaging on second language learning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8, 461-482. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.27291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.27291

Valdés, G. (2000). Introduction. In Spanish for native speakers. AATSP professional development series handbook for teachers K-16, Volume 1 (pp. 1-20). Harcourt College.

Yanguas, I., & Lado, B. (2012). Is thinking aloud reactive when writing in the heritage language? Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 380-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01198.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01198.x

Zamora, C. (2022). The secret is in the processing: Categorizing how heritage learners of Spanish process. In M. A. Bowles (Ed.), Outcomes of university Spanish heritage language instruction in the United States (pp. 81-102). Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv296mt6k.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv296mt6k.9

Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021). EFL students’ preferences for written corrective feedback: Do error types, language proficiency, and foreign language enjoyment matter? Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564