Keywords
integrating content and language in higher education (ICLHE)
language outcomes
writing
proficiency
How to Cite
Number of views: 551
Number of downloads: 605
Abstract
This study analyzes the influence of English medium instruction (EMI) on student English writing development in a Spanish undergraduate context, a language skill that remains underexplored in EMI research at tertiary level. Through a longitudinal pre- and post-test method, it explores the writing progress of EMI engineering students as compared to the achievement of a group of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners, according to different quantitative and qualitative writing measures. Results show a positive impact of EMI on student writing development at the levels of lexical accuracy and vocabulary. However, other writing areas, such as syntax, grammar, organization, or fluency, appeared unaffected. These findings challenge, to some extent, the widespread assumption that EMI contributes to improving student English language proficiency. This study suggests that sole exposure to the language in EMI contexts does not suffice to improve students’ English writing abilities beyond the area of vocabulary. Therefore, it argues for the inclusion of language skill support within EMI programs to provide students with opportunities to achieve a comprehensive development of their English language and writing competence.
References
Aguilar, M., & Muñoz, C. (2014). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12006
Aguilar, M., & Rodríguez, R. (2012). Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.615906
Ament, J. R., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2015). Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239
Breeze, R., & Dafouz, E. (2017). Constructing complex cognitive discourse functions in higher education: An exploratory study of exam answers in Spanish and English-medium instruction settings. System, 70, 81-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.024
Briggs, J. G., Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Comparing teacher beliefs in secondary and tertiary education. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(3), 673-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.3.7
Chansri, C., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2016). Implementing CLIL in higher education in Thailand: The extent to which CLIL improves agricultural students’ writing ability, agricultural content and cultural knowledge. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 51, 15-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29139/aijss.20150401
Dafouz, E. (2020). Undergraduate student academic writing in English-medium higher education: Explorations through the ROAD-MAPPING lens. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100888
Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2020). ROAD-MAPPING English-medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave McMillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23463-8
Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 455-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.5
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
Friedl, G., & Auer, M. (2007). Rating scale used for assessment of the writing task. Erläuterungen zur Novellierung der Reifeprufungsverordnung fur AHS, lebende Fremdsprachen. BIFIE. Retrieved from: http://www.bifie.at/publikationen
Galloway, N., Kriukow, J., & Numajiri, T. (2017). Internationalisation, higher education and the growing demand for English: An investigation into the English medium of instruction (EMI) movement in China and Japan. British Council. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351184335-11
Galloway, N., & Rose, H. (2021). English medium instruction and the English language practitioner. ELT Journal, 75, 33-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa063
Gené-Gil, M., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J. (2015). Development of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL settings. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 286-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1053278
Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q. (2018). Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2
Graham, K. M., & Eslami, Z. R. (2020). Writing measures and outcomes in CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Writing & Pedagogy, 12(2-3), 341-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.17755
Hernández, N., & Jiménez, A. (2017). English as a medium of instruction: Evidence for language and content targets in bilingual education in economics. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(7), 883-896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1125847
Hidalgo, M. A., & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A. (2020). Task repetition and collaborative writing by EFL children: Beyond CAF measures. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 501-522. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.5
Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.
Jexenflicker, S., & Dalton-Puffer, C. (2010). The CLIL differential: Comparing the writing of CLIL and non-CLIL students in higher colleges of technology. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 169-189). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.09jex
Kamaşak, R., Sahan, K., & Rose, H. (2020). Academic language-related challenges at an English-medium university. English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100945
Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875964
Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 31-42.
Lasagabaster, D. (2018). Fostering team teaching: Mapping out a research agenda for English-medium instruction at university level. Language Teaching, 51(3), 400-416. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000113
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Language and content in policy and practice. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (2022). English language teaching and English-medium instruction: Putting research into practice. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(1), 85-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jemi.21026.mck
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2007). The need for focus on form (FoF) in content and language integrated approaches: An exploratory study. RESLA, 1, 39-54.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
Parkinson, J. (2017). Teaching writing for science and technology. In J. Flowerdew & T. Costley (Eds.). Discipline-specific writing: Theory into practice (pp. 95-112). Routledge.
Pecorari, D., & Malmström, H. (2018). At the crossroads of TESOL and English medium instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 497-515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.470
Roquet, H., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2015). Do productive skills improve in content and language integrated learning contexts? The case of writing. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 489-511, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv050
Rose, H., Macaro, E., Sahan, K., Aizawa, I., Zhou, S., & Wei, M. (2021). Defining English medium instruction: Striving for comparative equivalence. Language Teaching, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000483
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2019). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149-2161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690
Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (2010). Written production and CLIL: An empirical study. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula & U. Smit (Eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms (pp. 191-209). John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.10rui
Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. M. (2015). Analyzing writing in English-medium instruction at university. Linguarum Arena, 6, 45-58.
Sánchez-Pérez, M. M., & Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S. (2015). Writing professional genres in a second language: Results from a Spanish university CLIL context. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(5), 576-580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-5-7
Salaberri-Ramiro, M. S., & Sánchez-Pérez, M. M. (2018). Motivations of higher education students to enrol in bilingual courses. Porta Linguarum, 3, 61-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54161
Sánchez-Pérez, M. M. (2020). Teacher training for English-medium instruction in higher education. IGI-Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2318-6
Sánchez-Pérez, M. M. (2021). Predicting content proficiency through disciplinary-literacy variables in English-medium writing. System, 97, 102463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102463
Tatzl, D. (2011). English-medium masters’ programmes at an Austrian university of applied sciences: Attitudes, experiences and challenges. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 252-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.08.003
Unterberger, B. S. (2018). The English-medium paradigm: A conceptualisation of English-medium teaching in higher education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), 527-539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1491949
Vidal, K., & Jarvis, S. (2020). Effects of English-medium instruction on Spanish students’ proficiency and lexical diversity in English. Language Teaching Research, 24(5), 568-587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818817945
Wächter, B., & Maiworm, F. (2014). English-taught programmes in European higher education. The state of play in 2014. Lemmens.
Wilkinson, R. (2013). English-medium instruction at a Dutch University: Challenges and pitfalls. In A. Doiz, D. Lasagabaster, & J. Sierra (Eds.). English-medium instruction at universities (pp. 3-26). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847698162-005
Wilkinson, R. (2018). Content and language integration at universities? Collaborative reflections. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(5), 607-615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1491948
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2011). Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 343-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401154
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. University of Hawaii Press.
Zhang, M., & Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2021). Discipline-specific language learning outcomes in EMI programs in the People’s Republic of China. Language and Education, 35(4), 357-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1895827
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.