Keywords
individual differences
discipline-based differences
structural equation modelling (SEM)
general English proficiency
academic success
How to Cite
Number of views: 754
Number of downloads: 1025
Abstract
This study focuses on the predictive power of linguistic (i.e., general English proficiency; identified simply as “proficiency” in this paper) and non-linguistic (i.e., language learning anxiety and self-regulation) factors on the academic success of English medium instruction (EMI) students studying in engineering and social sciences programs in a Turkish university setting. Data were collected from 705 conveniently sampled EMI students of four academic subjects (international relations; N = 158; business administration; N = 184; mechatronics engineering; N = 181; mechanical engineering: N = 182) representing two disciplines (i.e., social sciences and engineering) from a public university. Pearson correlation and SEM analyses were run to determine the relationships among language learning anxiety, self-regulation, proficiency and EMI success. Findings revealed that anxiety and self-regulation skills do affect EMI students’ proficiency irrespective of academic disciplines. Both self-regulation and proficiency impacted EMI students’ academic success in engineering, while only proficiency predicted academic success in the social sciences. These results are discussed and pedagogical implications are given related to the impact of linguistic and non-linguistic factors in EMI contexts.
References
Altay, M., Curle, S., Yuksel, D., & Soruç, A. (2022). Investigating academic achievement of English medium instruction courses in Turkey. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 117-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.6
Andrade, M. S., & Evans, N. W. (2013). Principles and practices for response in second language writing: Developing self-regulated learners. Taylor and Francis.
Bai, B. (2018). Understanding primary school students’ use of self-regulated writing strategies through think-aloud protocols. System, 78, 15-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.003
Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2023). The role of growth mindset, self-efficacy and intrinsic value in self-regulated learning and English language learning achievements. Language Teaching Research, 27(1), 207-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820933190
Bolton, K., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). English as an academic language at a Swedish university: Parallel language use and the “threat” of English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(5), 429-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2012.670241
Cambridge, ESOL. (2014). Cambridge proficiency English test. Cambridge University Press.
Cheng, Y. S. (2017). Development and preliminary validation of four brief measures of L2 language-skill-specific anxiety. System, 68, 15-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.009
Chun, S., Kim, H., Park, C. K., McDonald, K., Sun Ha, O., Kim, D. L., & Lee, S. M. (2017). South Korean students’ responses to English-medium instruction courses. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(6), 951-965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6049
Curle, S., Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., & Altay, M. (2020). Predictors of English medium instruction academic success: English proficiency versus first language medium. System, 95, 102378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102378
Dearden, J., & Macaro, E. (2016). Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 455-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.5
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual factors in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
Evans, S. (2000). Classroom language use in Hong Kong’s English-medium secondary schools. Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 19-43.
Galloway, N., Numajiri, T., & Rees, N. (2020). The “internationalization,” or “Englishization,” of higher education in East Asia. Higher Education, 80(3), 395-414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00486-1
Griffiths, C., & Soruç, A. (2020). Individual differences in language learning. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52900-0
Guo, Y., Xu, J., & Liu, X. (2018). English language learners’ use of self-regulatory strategies for foreign language anxiety in China. System, 76, 49-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.05.001
Henry, A. (2019). Directed motivational currents: Extending the theory of L2 vision. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 139-161). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_7
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Hu, J., & Gao, X. (2018). Self-regulated strategic writing for academic studies in an English-medium-instruction context. Language and Education, 32(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1373804
Iwaniec, J. (2014). Motivation of pupils from southern Poland to learn English. System, 45, 67-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.003
Kaya, S., Yuksel, D., & Curle, S. (2021). The effects of language learning and maths mindsets on academic success in an engineering program in Turkey. Journal of Engineering Education, 3(1), 50-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20499
Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 81-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510802602640
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Kuteeva, M., & Airey, J. (2014). Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent language policy developments. Higher Education, 67(5), 533-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6
Lasagabaster, D. (2016). The relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium instruction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(3), 315-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1105806
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-227-7/001
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Margić, B. D., & Vodopija-Krstanović, I. (2018). Language development for English-medium instruction: Teachers’ perceptions, reflections, and learning. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35, 31-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.06.005
McKinley, J. & Galloway, N. (Eds.) (2022). English medium instruction practices in higher education: International perspectives. Bloomsbury. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350167889
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Pearson Longman.
Oteir, N. I., & Al-Otaibi, N. A. (2019). Foreign language anxiety: A systematic review. Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 309-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.21
Rose, H., McKinley, J., Xu, X., & Zhou, S. (2020). Investigating policy and implementation of English medium instruction in higher education institutions in China. London: British Council. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
Rose, H., Curle, S., Aizawa, I., & Thompson, G. (2020). What drives success in English medium taught courses? The interplay between language proficiency, academic skills, and motivation. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2149-2161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1590690
Sahan, K., Rose, H., & Macaro, E. (2021). Models of EMI pedagogies: At the interface of language use and interaction. System, 101, 102616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102616
Sandström, A., & Neghina, C. (2017). English-taught bachelor’s programs: Internationalizing European higher education. European Association for International Education.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Soruç, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). English as a medium of instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72(1), 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx017
Soruç, A., Dinler, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). Listening comprehension strategies of EMI students in Turkey. In Y. Kırkgoz & K. Dikilitas (Eds.), Key issues in English for specific purposes in higher education (pp. 265-287). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70214-8_15
Soruç, A., Altay, M., Curle, S., & Yuksel, D. (2021). Students’ academic language-related challenges in English Medium Instruction: The role of English proficiency and language gain. System, 103, 102651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102651
Soruç, A., Pawlak, M., Yuksel, D., & Horzum, B. (2022). Investigating the impact of linguistic and non-linguistic factors on EMI academic success. System, 107, 102794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102794
Suzuki, S., Harada, T., Eguchi, M., Kudo, S., & Moriya, R. (2017). Investigating the relationship between students’ attitudes toward English-medium instruction and L2 Speaking. Essays on English Language and Literature, 46(1), 25-41.
Thompson, A. S., & Lee, J. (2014). The impact of experience abroad and language proficiency on language learning anxiety. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 252-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.125
Thompson, G., Aizawa, I., Curle, S., & Rose, H. (2019). Exploring the role of self-efficacy beliefs and learner success in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1651819
Wang, W., & Zhan, J. (2020). The relationship between English language learner characteristics and online self-regulation: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 12(7), 3009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073009
Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.
Xie, W., & Curle, S. (2022). Success in English medium instruction in China: Significant indicators and implications. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(2), 585-597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1703898
Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2018). How does anxiety influence language performance? From the perspectives of foreign language classroom anxiety and cognitive test anxiety. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0065-4
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Yuksel, D., Soruç, A., Altay, M., & Curle, S. (2021). A longitudinal study at an English medium instruction university in Turkey: The interplay between English language improvement and academic success. Applied Linguistics Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0097
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.