Keywords
self-regulation
transition
China
English medium instruction
How to Cite
Number of views: 534
Number of downloads: 691
Abstract
Listening to academic content in English medium instruction (EMI) classrooms at university can be a demanding task for students who transition from first language (L1) instructed secondary schools. This longitudinal mixed methods study analyzes data from 316 students collected at the beginning, midterm, and the end of their first semester after entering an EMI transnational university in southeast China. The analysis of questionnaire responses revealed significant variations in students’ listening strategies over time, with a significant decrease in deep processing cognitive strategies at the midterm when content difficulty increased. Conversely, two types of metacognitive strategies (problem solving, plan evaluation) increased significantly during the second half of the semester. Informed by Zimmerman’s (2000) social cognitive self-regulated learning (SRL) model, thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 34 participants revealed that students generally developed a more top-down listening approach focusing on content learning over the semester and became more selective in their strategic and self-regulatory processes after the midterm “watershed” moment. Results highlight the importance of structured topic knowledge in EMI curriculum design and the necessity of strategy training in language support programs.
References
Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2020). High school to university transitional challenges in English medium instruction in Japan. System, 95, 102390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102390
Dafouz, E., & García, D. (2013). “Does everybody understand?” teacher questions across disciplines in English-mediated university lectures: An exploratory study. Language Value, 5(1), 129-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2013.5.7
Ding, F., & Stapleton, P. (2016). Walking like a toddler: Students’ autonomy development in English during cross-border transitions. System, 59, 12-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.003
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315779553
Eser, O., & Dikilitaş, K. (2017). Learners’ perceptions of translation in English as the medium of instruction (EMI) at university level. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 124-129.
Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, 30(3), 198-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2016). Adjusting to higher education in Hong Kong: The influence of school medium of instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(8), 1016-1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1228600
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Flick, U., Garms-Homolová, V., Herrmann, W. J., Kuck, J., & Röhnsch, G. (2012). “I can’t prescribe something just because someone asks for it . . .” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 97-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437183
Gao, X. (2008). Shifting motivational discourses among mainland Chinese students in an English medium tertiary institution in Hong Kong: A longitudinal inquiry. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 599-614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802373107
Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
Graham, S., & Macaro. E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58(4), 747-783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x
Herron, C., York, H., Cole, S. P., & Linden, P. (1998). A comparison study of student retention of foreign language video: Declarative versus interrogative advance organizer. Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 237-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01197.x
Hu, G., Li, L., & Lei, J. (2014). English-medium instruction at a Chinese university: Rhetoric and reality. Language Policy, 13(1), 21-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-013-9298-3
Kırkgöz, Y. (2005). Motivation and student perception of studying in an English-medium university. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 1(1), 101-123.
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice & using software. Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288719
Macaro, E. (2018). English medium instruction: Content and language in policy and practice. Oxford University Press.
Macaro, E., Baffoe-Djan, J., Rose, H., Sabato, B., Hughes, B., & Cuccurullo, D. (2019). Transition from secondary school CLIL to EMI at university: Initial evidence from research in Italy. British Council.
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000350
Macaro, E., Vanderplank, R., & Graham, S. (2005). A systematic review of the role of prior knowledge in unidirectional listening comprehension. Institute of Education, University of London.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
O’Malley, M. J., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching: Language learning strategies. Routledge.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., García-Pérez, D., Fraile, J., Sánchez Galán, J. M., & Pardo, R. (2021). Deep learning self-regulation strategies: Validation of a situational model and its questionnaire. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 26(1), 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.11.003
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Re-view, 16, 385-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) (ED338122). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED338122.pdf
Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000505
Rose, H. (2012). Reconceptualizing strategic learning in the face of self-regulation: Throwing language learning strategies out with the bath-water. Applied Linguistics, 33(1), 92-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr045
Rose, H., & Harbon, L. (2013). Self-regulation in second language learning: an investigation of the Kanji-learning task. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12011
Rose, H., McKinley, J., Xu, X., & Zhou, S. (2019). Investigating policy and implementation of English medium instruction in higher education institutions in China. British Council.
Soruç, A., & Griffiths, C. (2018). English as a medium of instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal, 72(1), 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx017
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674-701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Can self-regulation be transferred to second/foreign language learning and teaching? Current status, controversies, and future directions. Applied Linguistics, 43(3), 587-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab032
Tseng, W., Dörnyei, Z., & Schmitt, N. (2006). A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 78-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046
Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
Yang, W. (2017). From similarity to diversity: The changing use of language learning strategies in content and language integrated learning at the tertiary level in Taiwan. English Teaching and Learning, 41(1), 1-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00037-y
Zeng, Y., & Goh, C. C. (2018). A self-regulated learning approach to extensive listening and its i
Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 883-894). Springer International. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_47
Zhou, S., McKinley, J., Rose, H., & Xu, X. (2021). English medium higher education in China: Challenges and ELT support. ELT Journal, 76(2), 261-271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab082
Zhou, S., & Rose, H. (2021). Self-regulated listening of students at transition from high school to an English medium instruction (EMI) transnational university in China. System, 103, 102644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102644
Ziegler, N. A. (2014). Fostering self-regulated learning through the European language portfolio: An embedded mixed methods study. Modern Language Journal 98(4), 921-936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12147
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, Monique., P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeider (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan. A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk. D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.