Abstract
Adopting a sequential mixed-methods approach, the current inquiry examined English major students’ perceptions of the role of teacher confirmation and teacher credibility in enhancing their academic engagement in the Chinese context. In doing so, through WeChat messenger, three scales were provided to 1168 English major students chosen from different English as a foreign language (EFL) classes. For the sake of triangulation, 40 participants were invited to take part in interview sessions as well. The inspection of the correlations between the constructs indicated a strong association between student academic engagement and teacher confirmation as well as a close connection between student academic engagement and teacher credibility. This showed that the academic engagement of Chinese EFL students is tied to these teacher interpersonal behaviors. The contribution of teacher confirmation and credibility to Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement was also examined using path analysis, which demonstrated that Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement was predicted by teacher credibility and confirmation. Additionally, the interview outcomes proved the integral role of these two communication behaviors in increasing Chinese students’ engagement. Findings may have some noteworthy implications for teacher educators and language instructors.
Funding
The current study is sponsored by Educational Teaching Reform Project of He-nan Provincial Education Department, China (Grant No.: 2022SYJLX051).
References
Banfield, S. R., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2006). The effect of teacher misbehaviors on teacher credibility and affect for the teacher. Communication Education, 55(1), 63-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520500343400
Baralt, M. (2012). Coding qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 222-244). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch12
BERA. (2011). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Retrieved from http://con-tent.yudu.com/Library/A2xnp5/Bera/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http://free.yudu.com/item/details/2023387/Bera
Berg, B. L. (2002). An introduction to content analysis. In B. L. Berg (Ed.), Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (pp. 174-199). Allyn & Bacon.
Buckner, M. M., & Frisby, B. N. (2015). Feeling valued matters: An examination of instructor confirmation and instructional dissent. Communication Studies, 66(3), 398-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1024873
Burnard, P. (1996). Teaching the analysis of textual data: An experiential approach. Nurse Education Today, 16(4), 278-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-6917(96)80115-8
Campbell, L. C., Eichhorn, K. C., Basch, C., & Wolf, R. (2009). Exploring the relationship between teacher confirmation, gender, and student effort in the college classroom. Human Communication, 12(4), 447-464.
Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psycho-logy, 40, 2938-2947. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00227-8
Carver, C., Jung, D., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2021). Examining learner engagement in relationship to learning and communication mode. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 120-142). Multilingual Matters.
Chen, X., Dewaele, J.-M., & Zhang, T. (2021). Sustainable development of EFL/ESL learners’ willingness to communicate: The effects of teachers and teaching styles. Sustainability, 14(1), 396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010396
Croucher, S. M., Rahmani, D., Galy-Badenas, F., Zeng, C., Albuquerque, A., At-tarieh, M., & Nshom, E. N. (2021). Exploring the relationship between teacher confirmation and student motivation: The United States and Fin-land. In M. D. López-Jiménez & J. Sánchez-Torres (Eds.), Intercultural competence past, present, and future: Respecting the past, problems in the present, and forging the future (pp. 101-120). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8245-5_5
Derakhshan, A. (2021). The predictability of Turkman students’ academic engagement through Persian language teachers’ nonverbal immediacy and credibility. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages, 10(21), 3-24.
Derakhshan, A. (2022). The “5Cs” positive teacher interpersonal behaviors: Implications for learner empowerment and learning in an L2 context. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16528-3
Derakhshan, A., Eslami, Z. R., Curle, S., & Zhaleh, K. (2022). Exploring the validity of immediacy and burnout scales in an EFL context: The predictive role of teacher-student interpersonal variables in university students’ experience of academic burnout. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1), 87-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.1.5
Derakhshan, A., Fathi, J., Pawlak, M., & Kruk, M. (2022). Classroom social climate, growth language mindset, and student engagement: The mediating role of boredom in learning English as a foreign language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2099407
Dewaele, J.-M., & Li, C. (2021). Teacher enthusiasm and students’ social-behavioral learning engagement: The mediating role of student enjoyment and boredom in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 922-945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211014538
Dewaele, J.-M., Chen, X., Padilla, A. M., & Lake, J. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128
Dogan, U. (2015). Student engagement, academic self-efficacy, and academic motivation as predictors of academic performance. The Anthropologist, 20(3), 553-561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2015.11891759
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2012). How to design and analyze surveys in second language acquisition research. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 74-94). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch5
Ellis, K. (2000). Perceived teacher confirmation: The development and validation of an instrument and two studies of the relationship to cognitive and affective learning. Human Communication Research, 26(2), 264-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/26.2.264
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fernandes, C. (2019). The relationship between teacher communication, and teacher credibility, student motivation, and academic achievement in India (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oregon). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing Publication (No. 10980753).
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of re-search on student engagement (pp. 97-131). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1512
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
Friedman, D. A. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 180-200). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch10
Ghelichli, Y., Seyyedrezaei, S. H., Barani, G., & Mazandarani, O. (2020). The relationship between dimensions of student engagement and language learning motivation among Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 8(31), 43-57.
Goldman, Z. W., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014). Making students feel better: Examining the relationships between teacher confirmation and college students’ emotional outcomes. Communication Education, 63(3), 259-277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.920091
Goldman, Z. W., Claus, C. J., & Goodboy, A. K. (2018). A conditional process analysis of the teacher confirmation – student learning relationship. Communication Quarterly, 66(3), 245-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1356339
Goodboy, A. K., & Myers, S. A. (2008). The effect of teacher confirmation on student communication and learning outcomes. Communication Education, 57(2), 153-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520701787777
Gray, D. L., Anderman, E. M., & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). Associations of teacher credibility and teacher affinity with learning outcomes in health class-rooms. Social Psychology of Education, 14(2), 185-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9143-x
Gupta, M., & Pandey, J. (2018). Impact of student engagement on affective learning: Evidence from a large Indian university. Current Psychology, 37(1), 414-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9522-3
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289
Hsu, C. F. (2012). The influence of vocal qualities and confirmation of nonnative English-speaking teachers on student receiver apprehension, affective learning, and cognitive learning. Communication Education, 61(1), 4-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2011.615410
Hsu, C. F., & Huang, I. (2017). Are international students quiet in class? The influence of teacher confirmation on classroom apprehension and willingness to talk in class. Journal of International Students, 7(1), 38-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v7i1.244
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555-575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020114231387
Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The predicting role of EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviors in students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. BMC Psychology, 11(318), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01378-x
Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., & Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Computers & Education, 88, 84-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.015
Jiang, A. L., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). University teachers’ teaching style and their students’ agentic engagement in EFL learning in China: A self-determination theory and achievement goal theory integrated perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704269
Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65, 203-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z
Khajavy, G. H. (2021). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language class-room (pp. 241-259). Multilingual Matters.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2(141), 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.283
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006) (Eds.), What matters to student success? A review of the literature. National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
Lauermann, F., & Berger, J. L. (2021). Linking teacher self-efficacy and responsibility with teachers’ self-reported and student-reported motivating styles and student engagement. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101441
Lawson, M. A., & Masyn, K. E. (2015). Analyzing profiles, predictors, and con-sequences of student engagement dispositions. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 63-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.11.004
Lee, J. H. (2020). Relationships among students’ perceptions of native and non-native EFL teachers’ immediacy behaviours and credibility and students’ willingness to communicate in class. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 153-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1642187
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic Inquiry, 289(331), 289-327.
MacIntyre, P. D., Ross, J., & Clément, R. (2019). Emotions are motivating. In M. Lamb, K. Csizér, A. Henry, & S. Ryan (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of motivation for language learning (pp. 183-202). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28380-3_9
Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J. (2019). Teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teachers matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 861-876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000317
McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (2013). Source credibility measures. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science.
Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 643-660). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_40
Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024563
Mercer, S., MacIntyre, P., Gregersen, T., & Talbot, K. (2018). Positive language education: Combining positive education and language education. Theory and Practice of Second Language Acquisition, 4(2), 11-31.
Mottet, T. P., Frymier, A. B., & Beebe, S. A. (2006). Theorizing about instructional communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 255-282). Allyn & Bacon.
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 427-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288
Pan, Z., Wang, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). Unpacking Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement and psychological well-being: The roles of language teachers’ affective scaffolding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1799-1819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09974-z
Pawlak, M. (2014). Investigating learner engagement with oral corrective feedback: Aims, methodology, outcomes. In A. Łyda & K. Szcześniak (Eds.), Awareness in action. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00461-7_5
Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., & Zhaleh, K. (2019). The interplay of teacher success, credibility, and stroke with respect to EFL students’ willingness to attend classes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 50(4), 284-292.
Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., Zhaleh, K., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2023). Students’ willingness to attend EFL classes with respect to teachers’ credibility, stroke, and success: A cross-cultural study of Iranian and Iraqi students’ perceptions. Current Psychology, 42, 4065-4079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01738-z
Ramshe, M. H., Ghazanfari, M., & Ghonsooly, B. (2019). The role of personal best goals in EFL learners’ behavioural, cognitive, and emotional engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1627-1638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.121103a
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 23(1), 53-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965
Schaufeli, W. B. (2013). What is engagement. In C. Truss, K. Alfes, R. Delbridge, A. Shantz, & E. Soane (Eds.), Employee engagement in theory and practice (pp. 15-36). Routledge.
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102033005003
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schrodt, P., & Finn, A. N. (2011). Students’ perceived understanding: An alter-native measure and its associations with perceived teacher confirmation, verbal aggressiveness, and credibility. Communication Education, 60(2), 231-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.535007
Shappie, A. T., & Debb, S. M. (2019). African American student achievement and the historically Black University: The role of student engagement. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1649-1661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9723-4
Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Educa-tion, 59(2), 165-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903390867
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2(1), 53-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Teven, J. J. (2007). Effects of supervisor social influence, nonverbal immediacy, and biological sex on subordinates’ perceptions of job satisfaction, liking, and supervisor credibility. Communication Quarterly, 55(2), 155-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370601036036
Teven, J. J., & Hanson, T. L. (2004). The impact of teacher immediacy and perceived caring on teacher competence and trustworthiness. Communication Quarterly, 52(1), 39-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370409370177
Tibbles, D., Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Weber, K. (2008). Organization-al orientations in an instructional setting. Communication Education, 57(3), 389-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520801930095
Tsang, A., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2023). The relationships between young FL learners’ classroom emotions (anxiety, boredom, & enjoyment), engagement, and FL proficiency. Applied Linguistics Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0077
Wang, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). Enhancing Chinese and Iranian EFL students’ willingness to attend classes: The role of teacher confirmation and caring. Porta Linguarum, 39(1),165-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.23625
Wang, Y., Derakhshan A., & Pan, Z. (2022). Positioning an agenda on a loving pedagogy in second language acquisition: Conceptualization, practice, and research. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 894190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894190
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
Wu, H. W., Wang, Y. L., & Wang, Y. S. (2023). What do we know about L2 teachers’ emotion regulation? A bibliometric analysis of the pertinent literature. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 5(3), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v5i3.2012
Xie, F., & Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher inter-personal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410379680
Zhang, Q. (2009). Perceived teacher credibility and student learning: Development of a multicultural model. Western Journal of Communication, 73(3), 326-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310903082073
Zhang, Q. (2011). Teacher immediacy, credibility, and clarity as predictors of student affective learning: A Chinese investigation. China Media Re-search, 7(2), 95-104.
Zhang, Q., & Zhang, J. (2013). Instructors’ positive emotions: Effects on student engagement and critical thinking in US and Chinese classrooms. Communication Education, 62(4), 395-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.828842
Zhang, Z. V., & Hyland, K. (2022). Fostering student engagement with feedback: An integrated approach. Assessing Writing, 51, 100586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100586
Zhi, R., & Wang, Y. L. (2023). English as a foreign language teachers’ profession-al success, loving pedagogy and creativity: A structural equation modeling approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101370
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yongliang Wang , Mariusz Kruk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.