To lead or not to lead: The fluctuation of peer leadership in collaborative oral argumentation
Journal cover Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, volume 15, no. 1, year 2025
PDF

Keywords

peer leadership
collaborative argumentation
oral argumentation
peer interaction

How to Cite

Wu, Q., Feng, P., & Gu, M. M. (2025). To lead or not to lead: The fluctuation of peer leadership in collaborative oral argumentation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38694

Number of views: 188


Number of downloads: 34

Abstract

Working with peers in small groups is conducive to learning, and collaborative learning has been widely adopted in second language classrooms. Leadership, defined as the initiative taken to influence others in a group, plays a significant role in successful teamwork, but has not received due attention in research on collaborative peer work. To address this research gap, we conducted a case study in a university English as a foreign language classroom in China in which the participants navigated their oral argumentation tasks collaboratively. The current study offers insight into the fluctuation of peer leadership in collaborative oral argumentation based on group discussion and semi-structured interview data. The findings suggest that peer leadership is a dynamic process that fluctuates in function and individual contribution over time. The study also revealed that peer leadership is a complex process influenced by multiple factors, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, and task-related ones. In conclusion, we stress that, to optimize collaborative peer learning, teachers should strive to stimulate and nurture the emergence of leadership and provide space for its long-term development.

https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38694
PDF

References

Andrews, R. (2010). Argumentation in higher education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872710

Badura, K. L., Galvin, B. M., & Lee, M. Y. (2022). Leadership emergence: An integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2069-2100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000997

Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359

Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3

Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & North, S. (2012). Arguing as an academic purpose: The role of asynchronous conferencing in supporting argumentative dialogue in school and university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 38-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.005

Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Emery, C., Daniloski, K., & Hamby, A. (2011). The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence. Small Group Research, 42(2), 199-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410389494

Ensari, N., Riggio, R. E., Christian, J., & Carslaw, G. (2011). Who emerges as a leader? Meta-analyses of individual differences as predictors of leadership emergence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 532-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.017

Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076

Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 135-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651595

Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Voelpel, S. C., & Van Vugt, M. (2019). It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149

Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). When and how team leaders matter. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 37-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26002-6

Jin, T., Shi, Z., & Lu, X. (2019). From novice storytellers to persuasive arguers: Learner use of evidence in oral argumentation. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 1151-1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.541

Jin, T., Su, Y., & Lei, J. (2020). Exploring the blended learning design for argumentative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 23-34.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.

Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2

Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618

Lai, H. M. (2021). Understanding what determines university students’ behavioral engagement in a group-based flipped learning context. Computers & Education, 173, 104290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104290

Lee, O. (2017). Common core state standards for ELA/literacy and next generation science standards: Convergences and discrepancies using argument as an example. Educational Researcher, 46(2), 90-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17699172

Leeming, P. (2019). Emergent leadership and group interaction in the task-based language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 768-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.506

Leeming, P. (2024). The influence of small groups on leader stability and task engagement in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 52-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821989866

Li, Y., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Dong, T., Archodidou, A., Kim, I. H., . . . & Miller, B. (2007). Emergent leadership in children’s discussion groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000709336703

Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2007). Collaborative learning through chat discussions and argument diagrams in secondary school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 109-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782500

Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage.

Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x

Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2022). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 511-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1839024

Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684368

Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Salter-Dvorak, H. (2016). Learning to argue in EAP: Evaluating a curriculum innovation from the inside. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 19-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.005

Selcuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2019). The emergence and influence of group leaders in web-based collaborative writing: Self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781

Su, Y., Liu, K., Lai, C., & Jin, T. (2021). The progression of collaborative argumentation among English learners: A qualitative study. System, 98, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102471

Sulis, G. (2022). Engagement in the foreign language classroom: Micro and macro perspectives. System, 110, 102902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102902

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Y. (2012). Mainland Chinese students’ group work adaptation in a UK business school. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(5), 523-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.658562

Wu, Q., Jin, T., Chen, J., & Lei, J. (2023). Peer leadership in collaborative argumentative writing: A qualitative case study of blended design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 100995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100995

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Prentice-Hall.

Zaccaro, S. J., Green, J. P., Dubrow, S., & Kolze, M. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 2-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003

Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2013). Language-rich discussions for English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 44-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.003