Abstract
Working with peers in small groups is conducive to learning, and collaborative learning has been widely adopted in second language classrooms. Leadership, defined as the initiative taken to influence others in a group, plays a significant role in successful teamwork, but has not received due attention in research on collaborative peer work. To address this research gap, we conducted a case study in a university English as a foreign language classroom in China in which the participants navigated their oral argumentation tasks collaboratively. The current study offers insight into the fluctuation of peer leadership in collaborative oral argumentation based on group discussion and semi-structured interview data. The findings suggest that peer leadership is a dynamic process that fluctuates in function and individual contribution over time. The study also revealed that peer leadership is a complex process influenced by multiple factors, including intrapersonal, interpersonal, and task-related ones. In conclusion, we stress that, to optimize collaborative peer learning, teachers should strive to stimulate and nurture the emergence of leadership and provide space for its long-term development.
References
Andrews, R. (2010). Argumentation in higher education. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872710
Badura, K. L., Galvin, B. M., & Lee, M. Y. (2022). Leadership emergence: An integrative review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2069-2100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000997
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359
Chinn, C. A., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. (2001). Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378-411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.4.3
Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & North, S. (2012). Arguing as an academic purpose: The role of asynchronous conferencing in supporting argumentative dialogue in school and university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 38-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.005
Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emery, C., Daniloski, K., & Hamby, A. (2011). The reciprocal effects of self-view as a leader and leadership emergence. Small Group Research, 42(2), 199-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410389494
Ensari, N., Riggio, R. E., Christian, J., & Carslaw, G. (2011). Who emerges as a leader? Meta-analyses of individual differences as predictors of leadership emergence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 532-536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.017
Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
Felton, M., & Kuhn, D. (2001). The development of argumentive discourse skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2-3), 135-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2001.9651595
Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Voelpel, S. C., & Van Vugt, M. (2019). It’s not just what is said, but when it’s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717-738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (2005). When and how team leaders matter. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 37-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26002-6
Jin, T., Shi, Z., & Lu, X. (2019). From novice storytellers to persuasive arguers: Learner use of evidence in oral argumentation. TESOL Quarterly, 53(4), 1151-1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.541
Jin, T., Su, Y., & Lei, J. (2020). Exploring the blended learning design for argumentative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 23-34.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
Lai, H. M. (2021). Understanding what determines university students’ behavioral engagement in a group-based flipped learning context. Computers & Education, 173, 104290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104290
Lee, O. (2017). Common core state standards for ELA/literacy and next generation science standards: Convergences and discrepancies using argument as an example. Educational Researcher, 46(2), 90-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17699172
Leeming, P. (2019). Emergent leadership and group interaction in the task-based language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 768-793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.506
Leeming, P. (2024). The influence of small groups on leader stability and task engagement in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 52-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821989866
Li, Y., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Dong, T., Archodidou, A., Kim, I. H., . . . & Miller, B. (2007). Emergent leadership in children’s discussion groups. Cognition and Instruction, 25(1), 1-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000709336703
Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2007). Collaborative learning through chat discussions and argument diagrams in secondary school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 109-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782500
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage.
Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x
Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2022). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(2), 511-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1839024
Qiu, X., & Lo, Y. Y. (2017). Content familiarity, task repetition and Chinese EFL learners’ engagement in second language use. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 681-698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816684368
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
Salter-Dvorak, H. (2016). Learning to argue in EAP: Evaluating a curriculum innovation from the inside. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 19-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.12.005
Selcuk, H., Jones, J., & Vonkova, H. (2019). The emergence and influence of group leaders in web-based collaborative writing: Self-reported accounts of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650781
Su, Y., Liu, K., Lai, C., & Jin, T. (2021). The progression of collaborative argumentation among English learners: A qualitative study. System, 98, 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102471
Sulis, G. (2022). Engagement in the foreign language classroom: Micro and macro perspectives. System, 110, 102902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102902
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Y. (2012). Mainland Chinese students’ group work adaptation in a UK business school. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(5), 523-535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.658562
Wu, Q., Jin, T., Chen, J., & Lei, J. (2023). Peer leadership in collaborative argumentative writing: A qualitative case study of blended design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 100995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100995
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Prentice-Hall.
Zaccaro, S. J., Green, J. P., Dubrow, S., & Kolze, M. (2018). Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 2-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003
Zhang, J., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2013). Language-rich discussions for English language learners. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 44-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.003
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qian Wu, Pengpeng Feng, Mingyue Michelle Gu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.