Keywords
general language effort
input
emotionality
How to Cite
Number of views: 17672
Number of downloads: 379
Abstract
According to the critical period hypothesis, the earlier the acquisition of a second language starts, the better. Owing to the plasticity of the brain, up until a certain age a second language can be acquired successfully according to this view. Early second language learners are commonly said to have an advantage over later ones especially in phonetic/phonological acquisition. Native-like pronunciation is said to be most likely to be achieved by young learners. However, there is evidence of accentfree speech in second languages learnt after puberty as well. Occasionally, on the other hand, a nonnative accent may appear even in early second (or third) language acquisition. Cross-linguistic influences are natural in multilingual development, and we would expect the dominant language to have an impact on the weaker one(s). The dominant language is usually the one that provides the largest amount of input for the child. But is it always the amount that counts? Perhaps sometimes other factors, such as emotions, ome into play? In this paper, data obtained from an EnglishPersian-Hungarian trilingual pair of siblings (under age 4 and 3 respectively) is analyzed, with a special focus on cross-linguistic influences at the phonetic/phonological levels. It will be shown that beyond the amount of input there are more important factors that trigger interference in multilingual development.References
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2014). Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aycicegi, A., & Harris, C. (2004). Bilinguals’ recall and recognition of emotion words. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 977-987.
Barac, R., & Bialystok, E. (2012). Bilingual effects on cognitive and linguistic development: Role of language, cultural background, and education. Child Development, 83, 413-422.
Bialystok, E. (2001). Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cenoz, J. (2000). Research on multilingual acquisition. In J. Cenoz & U. Jessner (Eds.), English in Europe: The acquisition of a third language (pp. 39-53). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
De Houwer,A. (1995). Bilingual language acquisition. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The handbook of child language (pp. 219-250). Blackwell.
De Houwer, A. (2001, September). Language maintenance in trilingual families in Flanders. Paper presented at the second International Conference on Third Language Acquisition and Trilingualism, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533.
Deuchar, M., & Quay, S. (2000). Bilingual acquisition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). New themes and approaches in second language motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 43-59.
Fantini, A.(1985). Language acquisition of a bilingual child: A sociolinguistic perspective (to age ten). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Gósy, M. (2001). The VOT of the Hungarian voiceless plosives in spontaneous speech. International Journal of Speech Technology, 4(1), 75-85.
Grosjean, F. (2010). Bilingual. Life and reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grosjean, F., & Li, P. (2013). The psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Wiley Blackwell.
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Ioup,G.(1995). Evaluating the need for input enhancement in post-critical period language acquisition. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 95-124). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jeremiás, É. (1986). Mai nyelvi változatok és nyelvtörténeti hátterük a perzsában. In Keletkutatás (pp. 56-68). Budapest: Kőrösi Csoma Társaság.
Johnson, C., & Wilson, I. (2002). Phonetic evidence for early language differentiation: Research issues and some preliminary data. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 271-289.
Kehoe, M. (2002). Developing vowel systems as a window to bilingual phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 315-334.
Keshavarz, M., & Ingram, D. (2002). The early phonological development of a FarsiEnglish bilingual child. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(3), 255-269.
Lanza, E. (2007). Multilingualism and the family. In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of multilingualism and multilingual communication (pp. 45-67). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.
Li, P. (2013). Successive language acquisition. In F. Grosjean & P. Li (Eds.), The psycholinguistics of bilingualism (pp. 145-167). Wiley-Blackwell.
Marian, V., & Shook, A. (2012, October 31). The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Cerebrum. Retrieved from http://dana.org/news/cerebrum/detail.aspx?id=39638
Navracsics, J. (2004). Navracsics corpus. TalkBank. ISBN: 1-59642-141-X. Retrieved from http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/browser/index.php?url=Biling/Navracsics/
Paradis, M., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Autonomous or interdependent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1-25.
Quay, S. (2008). Dinner conversations with a trilingual two-year-old: Language socialization in a multilingual context. First Language, 28, 5-33.
Räsänen, S., & Pine, J. (2014). Emotional force of languages in multilingual speakers in Finland. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 443-471. doi: 10.1017/S0142716412000471
Singleton, D. (2014). How do attitude and motivation help in learning a second language? In V. Cook & D. Singleton (Eds.), Key topics in second language acquisition (pp. 89-109) Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Tare, M., & Gelman, S. (2011). Bilingual parents’ modelling of pragmatic language use in multiparty interactions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 761-780. doi: 10.1017/S0142716411000051
Watson, I. (1991). Phonological processing in two languages. In E. Bialystok (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children (pp. 25-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.