Keywords
language aptitude
explicit learning
implicit learning
critical period
How to Cite
Number of views: 646
Number of downloads: 497
Abstract
Language awareness and language aptitude often crop up in discussion of various second language acquisition phenomena, including age-related phenomena. There is a troublesome and ongoing definitional and theoretical problem in this connection: Different researchers have different perspectives on what is to be included in the respective notions; on how do to measure language awareness, on the one hand, and language aptitude, on the other; and on how or whether to differentiate the two constructs in terms of innateness versus experience. This article begins by addressing the entire problematic of the conceptualization of language awareness and language aptitude. The language awareness/aptitude issue features in the maturational debate in connection with two claims. First, it is discussed in relation to the view that second-language (L2) learning of older individuals is explicit (whereas that of younger individuals is implicit). Second, it is referred to in regard to the notion that there are older L2 learners who appear to be able to “beat” the critical period thanks to high levels of language aptitude. The article critically explores both these propositions and concludes that neither is particularly safe, especially given the uncertain state of the relevant research context.
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481-509. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073X
Andrews, S. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness, 4(4), 292-309. Retrieved from http://bernardbaars.pbworks.com/f/Baars%20Theater%20book%20Ch%201-2.pdf
Bialystok, E., & Majumder, S. (1998). The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 69-85. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010584
Bylund, E. (2009). Maturational constraints and first language attrition. Language Learning, 59(3), 687-715. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010584
Bylund, E., Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2010). The role of language aptitude in first language attrition: The case of pre-pubescent attriters. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 443-464. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp059
Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2(1), 5-14.
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test: MLAT. Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Chan E., Skehan, P., & Gong, G. (2011). Working memory, phonemic coding ability and foreign language aptitude: Potential for construction of specific language aptitude tests – the case of Cantonese. A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60(1), 45-73. doi: 10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p045
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499-533. Retrieved from http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/~karin/550.READINGS/SYNTAX/CRITICAL.PERIOD/Dekeyser.pdf
DeKeyser, R. (2003a). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313-348). London: Blackwell.
DeKeyser, R. (2003b, March). Confusion about confounding: The critical period and other age-related aspects of second language learning. Paper presented at ELIA VIII (Encuentros de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada), “El factor edad en la adquisición y enseñanza de L2”, Seville, Spain.
DeKeyser, R. (2006). A critique of recent arguments against the critical period hypothesis. In C. Abello-Contesse, R. Chacón-Beltrán, M. D. López-Jimé-nez, & M. M. Torreblanca-López (Eds.), Age in L2 acquisition and teaching (pp. 49-58). Bern: Peter Lang.
DeKeyser, R. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62 (Suppl. 2), 189-200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x
DeKeyser, R., & Koeth, J. (2011). Cognitive aptitudes for L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research on second language teaching and learning: Vol. 2 (pp. 395-406). New York: Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59 (Suppl. 1), 230-248.
Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2013) Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. London: Routledge.
Eysenck, M. (2012). Fundamentals of cognition. Hove: Psychology Press.
Gass, S., & Lee, J. (2011). Working memory capacity, stroop interference, and proficiency in a second language. In M. Schmid & W. Lowie (Eds.), From structure to chaos: Twenty years of modeling bilingualism (pp. 59-84). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Granena, G. (2013). Cognitive attitudes for second language learning and the LLAMA Language Aptitude Test. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate attainment (pp. 3-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Granena G., & Long M. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research, 29(3), 311-343. doi: 10.1177/0267658312461497
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Language aptitude and second language proficiency in classroom learners of different starting ages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(3), 379-400. doi: http://dx.doi.org/
Hassanzadeh, N., & Nabifar, N. (2011). The effect of awareness and explicit knowledge of mother tongue grammar on the learning of foreign language grammar. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 1(2), 7-24. Retrieved from at http://www.academians.org/Articles/paper7.pdf
Hawkins, E. (1999) Foreign language study and language awareness. Language Awareness, 8(3 & 4), 124-142. Retrieved from http://jaling.ecml.at/pdfdocs/hawkins.pdf
Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., & Dunning, D. L. (2009). Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Developmental Science, 12(4), F9-F15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x
James, C. (1996). A cross-linguistic approach to language awareness. Language Awareness, 5(3 & 4), 138-148. Retrieved from http://archive.ecml.at/mtp2/Alc/pdf/Carl_James.pdf
Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Jessner, U. (2014). Multilingual awareness or why the multilingual learner is a specific language learner. In M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 175-68). Heildeberg: Springer.
Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002
Kormos, J. (2013). New conceptualizations of language aptitude in second language attainment. In G. Granena & M. Long (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude and ultimate attainment (pp. 131-152). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Language awareness defined. (n.d.). Retrieved 14 November 2013 from the Association for Language Awareness website: http://www.lexically.net/ala/la_defined.htm
Lasagabaster, D. (2001). The effect of knowledge about the L1 on foreign language skills and grammar. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4(5), 310-331. Retrieved from http://www.siu-voss.net/effect_of_foreign_language_on_native_language.pdf
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, 109(1), 35-54. Retrieved from http://cnl.psych.cornell.edu/pubs/2002-mc-Psych-Review.pdf
Malabonga, V., Kenyon, D. M., Carlo, M., August, D., & Louguit, M. (2008). Development of a cognate awareness measure for Spanish-speaking English language learners. Language Testing, 25(4), 493-517. doi: 10.1177/0265532208094274. ISSN: 0265-5322
Mariani, L. (1992). Language awareness/learning awareness in a communicative A key to learner independence. Perspectives: A Journal of TESOL-Italy, 18(2). Retrieved from http://www.learningpaths.org/papers/paperawareness.htm (May 13, 2014).
Meara, P. (2005). LLAMA language aptitude tests. Swansea: Lognostics.
Meara, P. (n.d.). Free software from _lognostics. The LLAMA Language Aptitude Tests. Retrieved February 2014 from the _lognostics website: http://www.lognostics.co.uk/tools/llama/
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Morales, J., Calvo, A., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 187-202. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002
Muñoz, C. (2014) The association between aptitude components and language skills in young learners. In M. Pawlak & L. Aronin (Eds.), Essential topics in applied linguistics and multilingualism (pp. 51-68). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder.
Parry, T., & Stansfield, C. W. (Eds.). (1990). Language aptitude reconsidered. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Pinto, M. A., & Titone, R. (1995). Tre test di abilità metalinguistiche: il Tam-1, il Tam-2, il Tam-3. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 27, 45-224.
Pinto, M.A., Titone, R., & Trusso, F. (1999) Metalinguistic awareness: Theory, development and measurement instruments. Rome: Instituto Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali.
Robinson P. (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sampson, G. (2005). The ‘language instinct’ debate. London: Continuum.
Sawyer, M., & Ranta, L. (2001). Aptitude, individual differences and instructional design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 319-353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, R. (2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan, K. N. Chin, S. Bhattm, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 27-50). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Shanks, D. R. (2005). Implicit learning. In K. Lamberts & R. L. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of cognition (pp. 202-220). London: Sage.
Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.)., Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69-94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Skehan, P. (2012). Language aptitude. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 381-395). New York: Routledge.
Sparks, R. (2012). Individual differences in L2 learning and long-term L1-L2 relationships. Language Learning, 62 (Suppl. 2), 5-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00704.x
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences? Modern Language Journal, 75, 3-16.
Stansfield, C. W. (1989). Language aptitude reconsidered. ERIC Digest. ED318226.
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the Language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.
Venkatagiri, H. S., & Levis, J. M. (2007). Phonological awareness and speech comprehensibility: An exploratory study. Language Awareness, 16(4), 263-277. doi:10.2167/la417.0
Verbal aptitude. (n.d.). In Webster’s online dictionary. Retrieved 20 April 2012 from http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definitions/ verbal+aptitude
Wen, Z (2012). Working memory and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22(1), 1-22.
Wen, Z., & Skehan, P. (2011). A new perspective on foreign language aptitude research: Building and supporting a case for ‘working memory as language aptitude. A Journal of English Language, Literatures and Cultural Studies, 60(1), 15-43. doi: 10.5007/2175-8026.2011n60p015
Wright, T. & Bolitho, R. (1993). Language awareness: A missing link in language teacher education? ELT Journal, 47(4), 292-304. doi: 10.1093/elt/47.4.292
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.