Keywords
SLA research
subjectivity
qualitative
quantitative
How to Cite
Number of views: 713
Number of downloads: 485
Abstract
Q methodology, an approach to inquiry on the subjective views about a complex phenomenon/issue which has been increasingly employed in a wide range of social science fields has not yet been applied in language learning and teaching research. It is a unique approach that has characteristics of both qualitative and quantitative research methods. The purpose of the present paper is to introduce Q methodology as an alternative approach and demonstrate its potential to respond to the needs of the field that has been expanding in its epistemological diversity since the social turn (Block, 2003; Ortega, 2012). The relevance of the methodology for SLA research will be discussed with a particular focus on the parallels between the development of the methodology in the 1930s and current criticisms towards the traditional cognitive approach in SLA. Using a published study (Irie & Ryan, 2014), the author explains how the focus on the holistic understanding of subjectivity is built into the procedure. Suggestions for possible areas of research and teaching in which Q methodology could be applied are discussed.References
Atkinson, D. (2010). Colloquium – Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 43, 96-98.
Benson, P., & Cook, L. (2013). The applied linguistic individual: Gaining perspective. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Sociocultural approaches to identity, agency and autonomy (pp. 178-186). Sheffield: Equinox.
Bartels, N. (2005). Researching applied linguistics in language teacher education. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Researching applied linguistics in language teacher education (pp. 1-26). New York: Springer.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Block, J. (2008). Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown, S. R. (1980). Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Brown, S. R., Danielson, S., & van Exel, J. (2014). Overly ambitious critics and the Medici Effect: A reply to Kampen and Tamás. Quality & Quantity. doi: 10.1007/s11135-014-0007-x
Brown, S. R., & Good, J. M. M. (2010). Q Methodology. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of research design (pp. 1150-1156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cooker, L., & Nix, M. (2011). On Q: An appropriate methodology for researching autonomy? (Part 2). Learning Learning, 18(1), 31-38. Retrieved from http://ld-sig.org/LL/18one/18-1toc.html
Cresswell, J.W. (2009) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). Psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Goldstein, D. M., & Goldstein, M. E. (2005). Q methodology study of a person in individual therapy. Clinical Case Studies, 4, 40-56.
Gregg, K. R. (2006). Taking a social turn for the worse: The language socialisation paradigm for second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 22, 413-42.
Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety (research timeline). Language Teaching, 43, 154-167.
Irie, K., & Ryan, S. (2014). Study abroad and the dynamics of change in learner L2 self-concept. In Z. Dörnyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 520-552). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Kampen, J. K., & Tamás, P. (2013). Overly ambitious: Contribution and current status of Q methodology. Quality & Quantity. doi 10.1007/s11135-013-9944-z
Kozaki, Y., & Ross, S. J. (2011). Contextual dynamics in foreign language learning motivation. Language Learning, 61, 1328-1354.
Lamb, M. (2013). The struggle to belong: Individual language learners and teachers in situated learning theory. In P. Benson & L. Cooker (Eds.), The applied linguistic individual: Autonomy, agency and identity (pp. 32-45). Sheffield: Equinox.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1994). The effects of induced anxiety on cognitive processing in computerised vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 1-17.
Mercer, S., & Williams, M. (Eds). (2014). Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Murray, G., Gao, X., & Lamb, T. (Eds.). (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning. Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89, 427-443.
Ortega, L. (2010). SLA after the social turn: Where cognitivism and its alternatives stand. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 167-180). New York: Routledge.
Ortega, L. (2012). Epistemological diversity and moral ends of research in instructed SLA. Language Teaching Research, 6, 206-226.
Pavlenko, A. (2013). The affective turn in SLA: From ‘affective factors’ to ‘language desire’ and ‘commodification of affect.’ In D. Gabrys-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), The affective dimension in second language acquisition (pp. 3-28). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Pemberton, R., & Cooker, L. (2012). Self-directed learning: Concepts, practice, and a novel research methodology. In S. Mercer, S. Ryan, & M. Williams (Eds.), Psychology for language learning: Insights from research, theory, and practice (pp. 305-327). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Phelps, E. A. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 27-54.
Ramlo, S. E., & Newman, I. (2011). Q methodology and its position in the mixed-methods continuum. Operant Subjectivity, 34, 172-191.
Richards, K., Ross, S., & Seedhouse, P. (2012). Research methods for applied language studies: An advanced resource book for students. New York: Routeldge.
Rodriguez, L. A., & Shepard, M. (2013). Adult English language learners’ perceptions of audience response systems (clickers) as communication aides: A Q-Methodology study. TESOL Journal, 4, 182-193.
Ryan, S. (2009). Ambivalence and commitment, liberation and challenge: Investigating the attitudes of young Japanese people towards the learning of English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30, 405-420.
Schumann, J. H. (1997). The neurobiology of affect in language. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (Eds). (2007). Emotion in education. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
Shemmings, D. (2006). ‘Quantifying’ qualitative data: An illustrative example of the use of Q methodology in psychosocial research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 147-165.
Shinebourne, P. (2009). Using Q Method in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 93-97.
Stenner, P., Watts, S., & Worrell, M. (2008). Q Methodology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Roger (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 215-239). London: Sage.
Stephenson, W. (1935). The technique of factor analysis. Nature, 136, 297.
Swain, M. (2013). The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching, 46, 195-207.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Watts, D. S., & Stenner, D. P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: Theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67-91.
Watts, D. S., & Stenner, D. P. (2012). Doing Q methodological research: Theory, method & interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Vol. 5: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.