Keywords
self-determination theory
intrinsic motivation
extrinsic motivation
adult learners
How to Cite
Number of views: 1432
Number of downloads: 965
Abstract
Attribution theory (Weiner, 1985) and self-determination theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985) have been explored as contributors to L2 motivation (cf. Dörnyei, 2001) but have never been studied quantitatively in concert. In addition, students’ attributions for success in learning a foreign language have never been measured through the use of a questionnaire. The aim of this paper is therefore (a) to develop a questionnaire with reliable constructs that allows to measure adult learners’ attributions for their success in learning English in a corporate setting, (b) to investigate these learners’ attributions, and (c) to investigate the relationship between students’ attributions and the constructs of Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation central to self-determination theory. Our main results show that among the attributions measured, interest, effort and corporate culture seemed to be the main causes that students recognised as directly involved in their success in learning English. Of all the attributional scales, interest and ability appeared to importantly contribute to intrinsic motivation, while corporate culture, encounters with foreign professionals and ability contributed to a lower extent to extrinsic motivation. It must be noted, however, that attributions for success to teacher and task were so consistently high that they could not be reliably measured with the questionnaire.References
Anderson, R., Manoogian, S. T., & Reznick, S. J. (1976). The undermining and enhancing of intrinsic motivation in preschool children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 915-922.
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (Eds). (1974). Motivation and achievement. Washington, DC: Winston & Sons.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Clément, R. (1980). Ethnicity, contact and communicative competence in a second language. In H. Giles, W. P. Robinson, & P. M. Smith (Eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 147-154). Oxford: Pergamon.
Clément, R. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 271-290.
Clément, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1977a). Attitudes and motivation in second language acquisition: An investigation of Ontario Francophones. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 12, 1-20.
Clément, R., Gardner, R. C., & Smythe, P. C. (1977b). Motivational variables in second language acquisition: A study of Francophones learning English. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 9, 123-133.
Clément, R., & Kruidenier, B. G. (1985). Aptitude, attitude and motivation in second language proficiency: A test of Clément’s model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 21-37.
Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1992). Towards a situated approach to ethnolinguistic identity: The effects of status on individuals and groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 203-232.
Clément, R., Noels, K. A., & Denault, B. (2001). Interethnic contact, identity, and psychological adjustment: The mediating and moderating roles of communication. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 559-577.
Covington, M. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Kapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1986). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
DesBrisay, M. (1984). Who knows best? A comparison of two placement procedures. Institut des Langues Vivantes Journal, 29, 162-165.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Understanding L2 motivation: On with the challenge! Modern Language Journal, 78, 515-523.
Dörnyei, Z. (1998, March). Demotivation in foreign language learning. Paper presented at the TESOL Congress, Seattle, WA.
Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualisation of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519-538.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. Harlow: Longman.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
Dörnyei, Z., Csizér, K., & Németh, N. (2006). Motivation, language attitudes and globalisation: A Hungarian perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics (Thames Valley University, London), 4, 43-69.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2011). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Ferguson, N. (1978). Self-assessment of listening comprehension. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Learning, 16, 149-156.
Gabillon, Z. (2013). Language learner beliefs from an attributional perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 106, 1697-1711.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: the role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. MA: Newbury House.
Gobel, P., & Mori, S. (2007). Success and failure in the EFL classroom: Exploring students’ attributional beliefs in language learning. In L. Roberts, Leah, A. Gürel, S. Tatar, & L. Marti (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook 7 (pp. 149-169). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gonzalez, A. S. (2011). Attribution theory and culture: using focus groups to uncover parameters of influence. Language Studies Working Papers, 3, 29-37.
Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5-39.
Gray, R. (2005). Attribution theory and second language learning: Results and implications. CELEA Journal, 28(5), 13-17.
Heider, F. (1944). Social Perceptions and Phenomenal Causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358-374.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley. Holec, H. (1979). Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Ishikawa, E., Negi, H., & Tajima, M. (2011). Attribution for self-evaluation in learning English. 日本大学歯学部紀要, 39, 43-50.
Jarvis, M. (2005). The psychology of effective teaching and learning. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
McLoughlin, D. (2007). Attribution theory and learner motivation: Can students be guided towards making more adaptive causal attributions? OnCUE Journal, 1(1), 30-38.
Noels, K. A. (2001a). Learning Spanish as a second language: Students' orientations and perceptions of teachers’ communicative style. Language Learning, 51, 107-144.
Noels, K. A. (2001b). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic, extrinsic and integrative orientations. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 43-68). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.
Noels, K. A. (2003). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners’ orientations and perceptions of their teachers’ communication style. In Z. Dörnyei (Ed.), Attitudes, orientations and motivations in language learning (pp. 97-136). Oxford: Blackwell.
Noels, K. A. (2009). The internalization of language learning into the self and social identity. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 295-313). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Noels, K. A., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (1999). Perceptions of teacher communicative style and students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Modern Language Journal, 83, 23-34.
Noels, K. A., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 424-442.
Noels, K. A., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2003). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 589-607.
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clement, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivation orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning 50, 57-85.
Peterson, C., Maier, S., & Seligman, M. (1993). Learned helplessness: A theory for the age of personal control. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pishghadam, R., & Modarresi, G. (2008). The construct validation and application of a questionnaire of attribution theory for foreign language learners (ATFLL). Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 2(3), 299-324.
Pishghadam, R., & Motakef, R. (2011). Attributional patterns with respect to major and attendance in private language schools: A case of EFL context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(7), 888-894.
Pishghadam, R., & Zabihi, R. (2011). Foreign language attributions and achievement in foreign language classes. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-11.
Pittman, T. S., Davey M. E., Alafat, K. A., Wetherhill, R. V., & Cramer, N. A. (1980). Informational vs. controlling rewards, levels of surveillance, and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 228-233.
Schumann, J. H. (1978). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In R. Gingras (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 27-107). Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Schumann, J. H. (1986). Research on the acculturation model for second language acquisition.Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 7, 379-392.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207-231.
Smith, G. (2012). Applying the findings of attribution theory-related research to the college foreign language classroom. Accents Asia, 5(2), 21-28.
Teravainen, A. (2014). Motivation, self-regulation and autonomous learning behaviour in an EFL context (Unpublished master’s thesis). Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tremblay, P. F., & Gardner, R. C. (1995). Expanding the motivation construct in language learning. Modern Language Journal, 79, 505-520.
Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: A qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. Modern Language Journal, 84, 69-84.
Ushioda, E. (1996). Developing a dynamic concept of L2 motivation. In T. Hickey, & J. Williams (Eds.), Language, education and society in a changing world (pp. 239-45). Dublin/Clevedon: IRAAL/Multilingual Matters.
Ushioda, E. (1998). Effective motivational thinking: A cognitive theoretical approach to the study of language learning motivation. In E. A. Soler & V. C. Espurz (Eds.), Current issues in English language methodology (pp. 77-89). Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
Ushioda, E. (2001). Language learning at university: Exploring the role of motivational thinking. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 93-125). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 271-360). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 37-63). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Walker, C. J., & Symons, C. (1997). The meaning of human motivation. In J. L. Bess (Ed.), Teaching well and liking it: Motivating faculty to teach effectively (pp. 3-18). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of emotion and motivation. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers: A social constructivist approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1999). Students’ developing conceptions of themselves as language learners. Modern Language Journal, 83, 193-201.
Williams, M., Burden, R., & Al-Baharna, S. (2001). Making sense of success and failure: The role of the individual in motivation theory. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (Technical Report No. 23, 171-84). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Centre.
Williams, M., Burden, R. L., & Lanvers, U. (2002). ‘French is the language of love and stuff’: Student perceptions of issues related to motivation in learning a foreign language. British Educational Research Journal, 28, 503-28.
Williams, M., Burden, R., Poulet, G., & Maun, I. (2004). Learners’ perceptions of their successes and failures in foreign language learning. Language Learning Journal, 30, 19-29.
Wu, J. (2011). An investigation and analysis of attribution preference and gender difference of non-English majors’ English learning - Based on investigation of non-English majors in Tianjin Polytechnic University. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(2), 332-337.
Yan, H., & Li, X. (2008). Causal attribution and its conceptions by non-English major postgraduates in China: A case study. Asian Social Science, 4(4), 77-80.
License
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.