Keywords
measurement
qualia
theory development
How to Cite
Number of views: 279
Number of downloads: 312
Abstract
This editorial introduces a special issue examining ability beliefs in language learning psychology. The issue presents diverse theoretical perspectives on how learners’ perceptions of their abilities affect language acquisition outcomes. Drawing on foundational work in competence motivation, the collection addresses a critical gap in language education research by highlighting how ability beliefs – from self-efficacy to mindsets – serve as essential mediators between learning experiences and achievement. Contributors explore methodological considerations for causal inference, systematic reviews of key constructs, and frameworks integrating individual and ecological perspectives. We argue that ability beliefs contribute unique variance to language learning achievement, often eclipsing other psychosocial variables, yet remain underrepresented in prominent language learning theories. By clarifying these overlapping but distinct constructs, the special issue provides a foundation for more integrated theoretical models through rigorous empirical testing. This collection helps bridge psychological qualia with observable learning outcomes, pushing the field toward improved theoretical parsimony and practical relevance.
References
Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Hiver, P. (2020). The fundamental difference hypothesis: Expanding the conversation in language learning motivation. SAGE Open, 10(3), 215824402094570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020945702
Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Hiver, P. (2024). Open science in applied linguistics: An introduction to metascience. In Plonsky, L. (Ed.), Open science in applied linguistics (pp. 17-43). Applied Linguistics Press. https://www.appliedlinguistics-press.org/home/catalog/plonsky_2024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/76dak
Al-Hoorie, A. H., McClelland, N., Resnik, P., Hiver, P., & Botes, E. (2024). The ideal L2 self versus ability beliefs: Are they really distinct? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g2e7y
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005-2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 145-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.10.006
Chanal, J., & Guay, F. (2015). Are autonomous and controlled motivations school-subjects-specific? PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0134660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134660
Chanal, J., & Paumier, D. (2020). The school-subject-specificity hypothesis: Implication in the relationship with grades. PLoS ONE, 15(4), e0230103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230103
Ciuk, D., Troy, A., & Jones, M. (2015). Measuring emotion: Self-reports vs. physiological indicators. SSRN Scholarly, 2595359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595359
Fryer, L. K., & Ainley, M. (2019). Supporting interest in a study domain: A longitudinal test of the interplay between interest, utility-value, and competence beliefs. Learning and Instruction, 60, 252-262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.002
Fryer, L. K., & Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q. (2019). Succeeding at junior high school: Students’ reasons, their reach, and the teaching that h(inders)elps their grasp. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59, 101778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101778
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542
Henry, A., & Liu, M. (2023). Can L2 motivation be modelled as a self-system? A critical assessment. System, 119, 103158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103158
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Evans, R. (2022). Complex dynamic systems theory in language learning: A scoping review of 25 years of research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(4), 913-941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263121000553
Joe, H.-K., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2017). Classroom social climate, self-determined motivation, willingness to communicate, and achievement: A study of structural relationships in instructed second language settings. Learning and Individual Differences, 53, 133-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.11.005
King, R. B., & Fryer, L. K. (2024). Hybridizing motivational strains: How integrative models are crucial for advancing motivation science. Educational Psychology Review, 36(38). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09850-9
Kline, R. (2019). Becoming a behavioral sciences researcher (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
Kuhn, T. (1962/2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001
Lawson, K. M., & Robins, R. W. (2021). Sibling constructs: What are they, why do they matter, and how should you handle them? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(4), 344-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211047101
Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2019). Relevance of goal theories to language learning research. System, 102122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102122
Li, S., Walters, G., Packer, J., & Scott, N. (2017). A comparative analysis of self-report and psychophysiological measures of emotion in the context of tourism advertising. Journal of Travel Research, 57(8), 1078-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517733555
Liu, M., Chong, S. W., Marsden, E., McManus, K., Morgan-Short, K., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Plonsky, L., Bolibaugh, C., Hiver, P., Winke, P., Huensch, A., & Hui, B. (2023). Open scholarship in applied linguistics: What, why, and how. Language Teaching, 56(3), 432-437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000349
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., Murayama, K., Guo, J., Dicke, T., & Arens, A. K. (2019). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281
Mercer, S. (2011). Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39(3), 335-346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.07.006
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., & Fryer, L. K. (2020). Profiles of language learning motivation: Are new and own languages different? Learning and Individual Differences, 79, 101852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101852
Oga-Baldwin, W. L. Q., Fryer, L. K., & Larson-Hall, J. (2019). The critical role of the individual in language education: New directions from the learning sciences. System, 102118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102118
Papi, M., & Hiver, P. (2020). Language learning motivation as a complex dynamic system: A global perspective of truth, control, and value. Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 209-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12624
Pawlak, M., Csizér, K., Kruk, M., & Zawodniak, J. (2022). Investigating grit in second language learning: The role of individual difference factors and background variables. Language Teaching Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221105775
Pekrun, R. (2024). Overcoming fragmentation in motivation science: Why, when, and how should we integrate theories? Educational Psychology Review, 36(27). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09846-5
Reeve, J. (2015). A grand theory of motivation: Why not? Motivation and Emotion, 40, 31-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9538-2
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838
Schneider, M., & Preckel, F. (2017). Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psycho-logical Bulletin, 143(6), 565-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098
Skinner, E. A. (2023a). Is academic motivation a tree trunk, a fan, a wall, a rope, a snake, or a spear? No, it’s an elephant and it’s on fire. In M. Bong, J. Reeve, & S.-I. Kim (Eds.), Motivation science: Controversies and insights (pp. 371-379). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197662359.003.0061
Skinner, E. A. (2023b). Four guideposts toward an integrated model of academic motivation: Motivational resilience, academic identity, com-plex social ecologies, and development. Educational Psychology Re-view, 35(3), 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09790-w
Skinner, E. A., & Raine, K. E. (2022). Unlocking the positive synergy between engagement and motivation. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 25-56). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07853-8_2
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Vollet, J. W., & Rickert, N. P. (2022). Complex social ecologies and the development of academic motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 2129-2165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09714-0
Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 329-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.81.3.329
License
Copyright (c) 2025 W. L. Quint Oga-Baldwin, Luke K. Fryer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.