Keywords
dimensional comparisons
social comparisons
L2 learning
review
How to Cite
Number of views: 285
Number of downloads: 266
Abstract
An expanding literature has explored the impact of second language (L2) self-concept on language achievement and motivation. This review adopts a psychological lens to examine L2 self-concept, beginning with an outline of prominent theoretical frameworks: situated expectancy‐value theory; Shavelson et al.’s (1976) hierarchical, multidimensional model of self-concept; and the integrated Marsh/Shavelson model (Marsh et al., 1988). Building on these foundations, we introduce Marsh’s (1986) internal/external (I/E) frame of reference model, which posits that, within domains such as mathematics or verbal subjects, achievement and academic self-concept are positively correlated, whereas achievement in one domain relates negatively to self-concept in a different domain. Originally confined to mathematics and a single verbal subject in the firstlanguage (L1), the I/E model has been extended to additional disciplines, including L2, through dimensional comparison theory (DCT; Möller & Marsh, 2013). Central to this paper is a synthesis of findings from a recent meta-analysis investigating I/E effects that incorporate measures of L2 achievement and self-concept. Results demonstrate that higher L2 achievement bolsters L2 self-concept while simultaneously diminishing self-concepts in math, physics, biology, and L1; conversely, accomplishments in those other fields exert negative influences on L2 self-concept. We conclude by discussing both theoretical insights and practical applications of self-concept research for language education generally, and L2 instruction specifically.
References
Arens, A. K., Becker, M., & Möller, J. (2018). The internal/external frame of reference (I/E) model: Extension to five school subjects and invariance across German secondary school ability tracks. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 143-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.07.005
Arens, A. K., Helm, F., Wolff, F., & Möller, J. (2020). Social and dimensional comparisons in the formation of German students’ verbal self-concepts. The Journal of Experimental Education 88(2), 245-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1635069
Arens, A. K., Jansen, M., Preckel, F., Schmidt, I., & Brunner, M. (2021). The structure of academic self-concept: A methodological review and empirical illustration of central models. Review of Educational Re-search, 91(1), 34-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320972186
Arens, A. K., Möller, J., & Watermann, R. (2016). Extending the internal/external frame of reference model to social studies: Self-concept and achievement in history and politics. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 91-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.044
Arens, A. K., Yeung, A. S., Craven, R. G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). The two-fold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 970-981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025047
Brunner, M., Keller, U., Dierendonck, C., Reichert, M., Ugen, S., Fischbach, A., & Martin, R. (2010). The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 964-981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019644
Calsyn, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1977). Self-concept of ability and perceived evaluation of others: Cause or effect of academic achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(2), 136-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.69.2.136
Chen, X., Xu, F., Nguyen, T.–K., Hong, G., & Wang, Y. (2010). Effects of cross-language transfer on first-language phonological awareness and literacy skills in Chinese children receiving English instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 712-728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018802
Dai, D. Y. (2002). Incorporating parent perceptions: A replication and extension study of the internal-external frame of reference model of self-concept development. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 617-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074355802237467
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
Dörnyei, Z. (2009) The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9-42). Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003
Eccles (Parsons), J. S, Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). W. H. Freeman.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Gaspard, H., Wigfield, A., Jiang, Y., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & Marsh, H. W. (2018). Dimensional comparisons: How academic track students’ achievements are related to their expectancy and value beliefs across multiple domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.10.003
Gaspard, H., Wille, E., Wormington, S. V., & Hulleman, C. S. (2019). How are upper secondary school students’ expectancy-value profiles associated with achievement and university STEM major? A cross-domain comparison. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 149-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.005
Gebauer, S. K., Zaunbauer, A. C., & Möller, J. (2013). Cross-language transfer in English immersion programs in Germany: Reading comprehension and reading fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 64-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.002
Gerber, J. P., Wheeler, L., & Suls, J. (2018) A social comparison theory me-ta-analysis 60+ years on. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 177-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000127
Goetz, T., Frenzel, C. A., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 9-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.002
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., & Dicke, T. (2017). Extending expectancy-value theory predictions of achievement and aspirations in science: Dimensional comparison processes and expectancy-by-value interactions. Learning and Instruction, 49, 81-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.007
Guo, J., Parker, P. D., Marsh, H. W., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Achievement, motivation, and educational choices: A longitudinal study of expectancy and value using a multiplicative perspective. Developmental Psychology, 51(8), 1163-1176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039440
Helm, F., Mueller-Kalthoff, H., Mukowski, R. & Möller, J. (2018). Teacher judgment accuracy regarding students` self-concepts: Affected by social and dimensional comparisons? Learning and Instruction, 55, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.002
Helm, F., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Nagy, N., & Möller, J. (2016). Dimensional comparison theory: Perceived subject similarity impacts on students’ self-concepts. AERA Open, 2, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858416650624
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.94.3.319
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Encyclopedia Britannica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10538-000
Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., Lüdtke, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Contrast and assimilation effects of dimensional comparisons in five subjects: An extension of the I/E model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1086-1101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000021
Jansen, T., Meyer, J., Wigfield, A., & Möller, J. (2022). Which student and instructional variables are most strongly related to academic motivation in K-12 education? A systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 148(1-2), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000354
Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2019). Relevance of goal theories to language learning research. System, 86, 102122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102122
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24, 17-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00259.x
Marsh, H. W. (1990). A multidimensional, hierarchical model of self-concept: Theoretical and empirical justification. Educational Psychology Review, 2, 77-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322177
Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 366-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.366
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective: Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00010.x
Marsh, H. W., Kong, C. K., & Hau, K. T. (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 543-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.3.543
Marsh, H. W., Kuyper, H., Seaton, M., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J. S., Möller, J., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2014). Dimensional comparison theory: An extension of the internal/external frame of reference effect on academic self-concept formation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 326-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.003
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abdelfattah, F., & Jansen, M. (2015). Dimensional comparison theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domains. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.005
Marsh, H. W., & Yeung, A. S. (2001). An extension of the internal/external frame of reference model: A response to Bong (1998). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 389-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906389-420
McCroskey, J. C. & McCroskey, L. (1988). Self-report as an approach to measuring communication competence. Communication Research Reports, 5, 108-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810
Mercer, S. (2011). The self as a complex dynamic system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 57-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2011.1.1.4
Mercer, S. (2014). Reimagining the self as a network of relationships. In K. Csizér & M. Magid (Eds.), The impact of self-concept on language learning (pp. 51-69). Multilingual Matters.
Möller, J. (under review). Ten years of dimensional comparison theory: On the development of a theory from educational psychology.
Möller, J., Helm, F., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Dimensional comparisons and their consequences for self-concept, motivation, and emotion. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclo-pedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 430-436). Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26092-3
Möller, J., & Köller, O. (2001). Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 826-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.4.826
Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120, 544-560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032459
Möller, J., Müller-Kalthoff, H., Helm, F., Nagy, N., & Marsh, H. W. (2016). The generalized internal/external frame of reference model: An extension to dimensional comparison theory. Frontline Learning Research, 4, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.169
Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129-1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309337522
Möller, J., Streblow, L., Pohlmann, B., & Köller, O. (2006). An extension to the Internal/External frame of reference model to two verbal and numerical domains. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21, 467-487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173515
Möller, J. Zimmermann, F., & Köller, O. (2014). The reciprocal inter-nal/external frame of reference model using grades and test scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 591-611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12047
Möller, J., Zitzmann, S., Machts, N., Helm, F., & Wolff, F. (2020). A meta-analysis of relations between achievement and self-perception. Review of Educational Research, 90, 376-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320919354
Niepel, C., Brunner, M., & Preckel, F. (2014). The longitudinal interplay of students’ academic self-concepts and achievements within and across domains: Replicating and extending the reciprocal internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1170-1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036307
Niepel, C., Stadler, M., & Greiff, S. (2019). Seeing is believing: Gender diversity in STEM is related to mathematics self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 1119-1130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000340
Sedikides, C., & Gregg, A. P. (2008). Self-enhancement: Food for thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 102-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00068.x
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1170010
Stocker, J., Abu-Hilal, M., Hermena, E., AlJassmi, M., & Barbato, M. (2021). Internal/external frame of reference model and dimensional comparison theory: A novel exploration of their applicability among Arab high school students. Educational Psychology 41(4), 483-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1887455
Trautwein, U., & Möller, J. (2016). Self-concept: Determinants and conse-quences of academic self-concept in school contexts. In A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the 21st century: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 187-214). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28606-8_8
Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_3
Van der Westhuizen, L., Arens, K., Keller, U., Greiff, S., Fischbach, A., & Nie-pel, C. (2023) The formation of academic self-concept and interest in primary school: Examining the generalized internal/external frame of reference model with first- and third-grade children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, 102-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102167
Wan, S., Lauermann, F., Bailey, D. H., & Eccles, J. S. (2021). When do students begin to think that one has to be either a “math person” or a “language person?”: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(9), 867-889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000340
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Möller, J. (2020). How dimensional comparisons help to understand linkages between expectancies, values, performance, and choice. Educational Psychology Review, 32(3), 657-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09524-2
Wolff, F., Nagy, G., Retelsdorf, J., Helm, F., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2018). The 2I/E model: Integrating temporal comparisons into the internal/external frame of reference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111, 1131-1161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000319
Wolff, F., Zitzmann, S., & Möller, J. (2020). Moderators of dimensional comparison effects: A comprehensive replication study putting prior findings on five moderators to the test and going beyond. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(3), 621-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000505
Wu, H., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, L., & Guo, C. (2021). A meta-analysis of the longitudinal relationship between academic self-concept and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1749-1778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09600-1
Wunberg, M., Feddermann, M., Baumert, J., & Möller, J. (2024). CLIL Effects on Academic Self-Concepts: Positive effects in English but detri-mental effects in math? Learning & Instruction, 92(4), 101923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101923
Xu, M. K., Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Ho, I. T., Morin, A. J. S., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2013). The internal/external frame of reference of academic self-concept: Extension to a foreign language and the role of language of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 489-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031333
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jens Möller, Katrin Arens, Christoph Niepel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1.1 The Author hereby warrants that he/she is the owner of all the copyright and other intellectual property rights in the Work and that, within the scope of the present Agreement, the paper does not infringe the legal rights of another person. The owner of the copyright work also warrants that he/she is the sole and original creator thereof and that is not bound by any legal constraints in regard to the use or sale of the work.
1.2. The Publisher warrants that is the owner of the PRESSto platform for open access journals, hereinafter referred to as the PRESSto Platform.
2. The Author grants the Publisher non-exclusive and free of charge license to unlimited use worldwide over an unspecified period of time in the following areas of exploitation:
2.1. production of multiple copies of the Work produced according to the specific application of a given technology, including printing, reproduction of graphics through mechanical or electrical means (reprography) and digital technology;
2.2. marketing authorisation, loan or lease of the original or copies thereof;
2.3. public performance, public performance in the broadcast, video screening, media enhancements as well as broadcasting and rebroadcasting, made available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them;
2.4. inclusion of the Work into a collective work (i.e. with a number of contributions);
2.5. inclusion of the Work in the electronic version to be offered on an electronic platform, or any other conceivable introduction of the Work in its electronic version to the Internet;
2.6. dissemination of electronic versions of the Work in its electronic version online, in a collective work or independently;
2.7. making the Work in the electronic version available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, in particular by making it accessible via the Internet, Intranet, Extranet;
2.8. making the Work available according to appropriate license pattern Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) as well as another language version of this license or any later version published by Creative Commons.
3. The Author grants the Publisher permission to reproduce a single copy (print or download) and royalty-free use and disposal of rights to compilations of the Work and these compilations.
4. The Author grants the Publisher permission to send metadata files related to the Work, including to commercial and non-commercial journal-indexing databases.
5. The Author represents that, on the basis of the license granted in the present Agreement, the Publisher is entitled and obliged to:
5.1. allow third parties to obtain further licenses (sublicenses) to the Work and to other materials, including derivatives thereof or compilations made, based on or including the Work, whereas the provisions of such sub-licenses will be the same as with the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons sub-license or another language version of this license, or any later version of this license published by Creative Commons;
5.2. make the Work available to the public in such a way that members of the public may access the Work from a place and at a time individually chosen by them, without any technological constraints;
5.3. appropriately inform members of the public to whom the Work is to be made available about sublicenses in such a way as to ensure that all parties are properly informed (appropriate informing messages).
6. Because of the royalty-free provision of services of the Author (resulting from the scope of obligations stipulated in the present Agreement), the Author shall not be entitled to any author’s fee due and payable on the part of the Publisher (no fee or royalty is payable by the Publisher to the Author).
7.1. In the case of third party claims or actions for indemnity against the Publisher owing to any infractions related to any form of infringement of intellectual property rights protection, including copyright infringements, the Author is obliged to take all possible measures necessary to protect against these claims and, when as a result of legal action, the Publisher, or any third party licensed by the Publisher to use the Work, will have to abandon using the Work in its entirety or in part or, following a court ruling in a legal challenge, to pay damages to a third party, whatever the legal basis
7.2. The Author will immediately inform the Publisher about any damage claims related to intellectual property infringements, including the author’s proprietary rights pertaining to a copyrighted work, filed against the Author. of liability, the Author is obliged to redress the damage resulting from claims made by third party, including costs and expenditures incurred in the process.
7.3. To all matters not settled herein provisions of the Polish Civil Code and the Polish Copyright and Related Rights Act shall apply.